Effects of gelcoat thickness on mechanical properties of woven glass/polyester laminated composite

M. Y. Yuhazri; M.H. Amirhafizan; G.C.H.  Nilson; H. Sihombing; A.M. Kamarul; U. Nirmal

doi:10.15282/jmes.12.1.2018.7.0301

Authors

M. Y. Yuhazri Faculty of Engineering Technology, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Hang Tuah Jaya, 76100, Durian Tunggal, Melaka, Malaysia
M.H. Amirhafizan Faculty of Manufacturing Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Hang Tuah Jaya, 76100, Durian Tunggal, Melaka, Malaysia
G.C.H. Nilson Faculty of Engineering Technology, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Hang Tuah Jaya, 76100, Durian Tunggal, Melaka, Malaysia
H. Sihombing Faculty of Technology Management and Technopreneurship, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Hang Tuah Jaya, 76100, Durian Tunggal, Melaka, Malaysia
A.M. Kamarul Faculty of Engineering Technology, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Hang Tuah Jaya, 76100, Durian Tunggal, Melaka, Malaysia
U. Nirmal Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Multimedia University, Jalan Ayer Keroh Lama, 75450, Melaka, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15282/jmes.12.1.2018.7.0301

Keywords:

Gelcoat; thickness, fracture, laminated, composite

Abstract

In this study, effects of gelcoat thickness on the mechanical properties and interfacial bonding of woven glass/polyester laminated composite are investigated by using threepoint flexural test and tensile test. The composites had been applied at variance thickness of gelcoat layers (0.25, 0.3, 0.35, 0.4, 0.45, and 0.5mm) using hand lay-up method. Samples were measured in two techniques for the flexural test, i.e., coated surface facing the loads (concave) and bare surface facing the loads (convex). Since the coated surface was concavely bent, greatest increase of flexural strength that acquired 5-fold of increase was shown by composite with 0.3 mm of gelcoat thickness for both measurements. The increasing of thickness to 0.35 mm and above deflated the rising percentage in flexural strength. This event was happened because of the gelcoat thickness ratio was greater than the matrix/reinforcement ratio. For tensile test, composite applied with gelcoat of 0.4 mm thickness exhibited the highest increase in strength. An increase of almost 38 % in tensile strength was recorded compared to the uncoated composite. Similarly, the increase in tensile strength reduced slightly when the gelcoat thickness was increased above 0.4 mm. The results demonstrate that the mechanical properties of the composite improve as the gelcoat thickness increases. However, the mechanical properties show no further improvement as the thickness is further increased above the optimum thickness.

References

Yuhazri MY, Sihombing H, ZA MZ, Nilson GCH. A review on gelcoat used in laminated composite structure.International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology. 2015;4:49-58.

See SC and Zhang ZY. Richardson MOW. A study of water absorption characteristics of a novel nano-gelcoat for marine application. Progress in Organic Coatings. 2009;65:169-174.

Karapappas P, Tsotra P and Scobbie K. Effect of nanofillers on the properties of a state of the art epoxy gelcoat. eXPRESS Polymer Letters. 2011;5:218-227.

Sockalingam S, Nilakantan G. Fiber-matrix interface characterization through the microbond test. International Journal of Aeronautical & Space Science 2012;13:282-295.

Lacovara B. Get wise to gel coat cracks: characterizing crack defects. Convergent Composites, American Composites Manufacturers Association. 2010;1-8.

Mouritz AP, Gibson AG. Fire properties of polymer composite materials. Springer Science & Business Media. 2007;143:279-280.

Pomázi Á, Toldy A. Particle distribution of solid flame retardants in infusion moulded composites. Polymers. 2017; 9:250.

Capela C, Ferreira JM, Cravo H, Costa JM. Fatigue and impact response of gel-coated glass mats/ polyester composites. Journal of Composite Materials. 2013; 48:1131-1137.

McCrary-Dennis MCL, Okoli OI. A review of multiscale composite manufacturing and challenges. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites. 2012;31:1687-1711.

CCP Composites Australia Corp. Gelcoat Troubleshooters Guide. CCP Composites Application Guide. 2014.

Ennos AR, Casteren AV. Transverse stresses and modes of failure in tree branches and other beams. The Royal Society B. 2010; 277:1253-1258.

Li Q, Zhao JC, Zhao B. Fatigue life prediction of a rubber mount based on test of material properties and finite element analysis. Engineering Failure Analysis. 2009;16:2304-2310.

Knoeller SL, Rome NY. Polymer matrix composite manufacturing induced defects. Advanced Materials, Manufacturing and Testing. 2009;5:7-10.

Baghaei B, Skrifvars M, Berglin L. Manufacture and characterisation of thermoplastic composites made from PLA/hemp co-wrapped hybrid yarn prepregs. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 2013;50:93-101.

Orifici A. Control of composite material crack branching for improved fracture toughness, 29th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Science. Germany, 7 – 12 September 2014. 2014:1-8.

Maksimović S. Postbuckling and failure analysis of axially compressed composite panels using FEM. Scientific Technical Review. 2007;57:.43-48.

Khelifa MZ, Al-Shukri HM. Fatigue study of e-glass fiber reinforced polyester composite under fully reversed loading and spectrum loading. Eng Technol. 2008;26:1210-1224.

Kalia S, Dufresne A, Cherian BM, Kaith BS, Avérous L, Njuguna J, Nassiopoulos E. Cellulose-based bio- and nanocomposites – a review. International Journal of Polymer Science. 2011:1-35.

Jawahar P, Kanny K, Balasubramanian M. Influence of nanoclay addition on properties of unsaturated-polyester nanocomposite gel coat system. Journal of Polymer Engineering. 2009;29:563-580.

Scott Bader Company Limited. Crystic Polyester Handbook, Wollaston, Wellingborough, Northamptonshire. 2005.

Muralidharan B, Summerscales J. Resin infusion under flexible moulding technique by in-mould gel coating using a flow medium. Indian Journal of Applied Research. 2013;3:292-293.

Clegg S, Haugaard M. The SAGE Handbook of Power, SAGE Publication. 2009.

Adams D. Composites on Yachts: Rigged for success, CW Composites World. 2010.

Krstulović-Opara L, Garafulić E, Klarin B, Domazet Ž. Application of gradient based IR thermography to the GRP structures inspection. Key Engineering Materials. 2012;488-489:682-685.

Ahmad S, Izhar UH. Wind Blade Material Optimization. Applied Mechanics & Materials. 2011;66-68:1199-1206.

Kumara MS, Raghavendraa K, Venkataswamya MA, Ramachandrab HV. Fractographic analysis of tensile failures of aerospace grade composites, Materials Research. 2012;15:990-997.

Chaturvedi MC. Welding and Joining of Aerospace Materials, Woodhead Publishing Limited. 2012:98.