Blast loaded steel-concrete composite slab

Authors

  • Aizat Alias Faculty of Civil Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, 26300 Gambang, Kuatan, Pahang, Malaysia. Phone: +6095492999; Fax: +609424222
  • A.F.M. Amin Faculty of Civil Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, 26300 Gambang, Kuatan, Pahang, Malaysia. Phone: +6095492999; Fax: +609424222

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15282/jmes.15.1.2021.21.0621

Keywords:

Numerical investigation, steel-concrete composite slab, finite element, CONWEP

Abstract

This paper presented a numerical investigation of a steel-concrete composite slab subjected to blast loads. The finite element model of the composite slab was developed and validated against experimental results. The validated finite element model of the composite slab then subjected to blast loads using CONWEP function in ABAQUS. A validation investigation was performed on CONWEP function by comparing the blast-pressure profiles from CONWEP against experimental data. Both validation studies showed that the developed finite element model of the composite slab and CONWEP agree reasonably well with test results. The fully restrained composite slab was subjected to four different blast loads with different explosive weights and standoff distances. The transient deformation of the composite slab after subjected to blast loads was investigated where as predicted the deformation of the composite slab was influenced by the blast pressure, which is affected by the weight of explosive and standoff distance. This study also investigated the mode of failure where it was determined flexural failure at the midspan is the main mode of failure accompanied with concrete tensile failure at the supports. The thickness of the profiled deck and the coeffecient of friction influenced the dynamic response of the composite slabs. Increasing the thickness reduces the maximum displacement of the composite slabs. Increasing the coefficient of friction reduces the maximum dislacement but once the coefficient of friction reach its optimum value, no positive benefit is gained.

References

V. Marimuthu, S. Seetharaman, S. Arul Jayachandran, A. Chellappan, T. K. Bandyopadhyay, and D. Dutta, “Experimental studies on composite deck slabs to determine the shear-bond characteristic (m - k) values of the embossed profiled sheet,” J. Constr. Steel Res., vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 791–803, 2007.

D. Lam, J. Qureshi, and J. Ye, “Composite behaviour of headed stud shear connectores in pairs with profiled metal deck flooring,” Proceeding 4th Int. Conf. Steel Compos. Struct. ICSCS, vol. 1, no. ii, pp. 494–499, 2010.

R. Sirilal and S. Aneez, “Bombs kill more than 200 in Sri Lankan churches, hotels on Easter Sunday,” Reuters. [Online]. Available: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-sri-lanka-blast-idUSKCN1RX038. [Accessed: 14-Oct-2019].

F. J. Mostert, “Challenges in blast protection research,” Def. Technol., vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 426–432, 2018.

F. Sadek, S. El-Tawil, and H. S. Lew, “Robustness of Composite Floor Systems with Shear Connections: Modeling, Simulation, and Evaluation,” J. Struct. Eng., vol. 134, no. 11, pp. 1717–1725, 2008.

Y. Alashker, S. El-Tawil, and F. Sadek, “Progressive Collapse Resistance of Steel-Concrete Composite Floors,” J. Struct. Eng., vol. 136, no. 10, pp. 1187–1196, 2010.

F. Fu, “Progressive collapse analysis of high-rise building with 3-D finite element modeling method,” J. Constr. Steel Res., vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 1269–1278, 2009.

S. Jeyarajan, J. Y. R. Liew, and C. G. Koh, “Analysis of steel-concrete composite buildings for blast induced progressive collapse,” Int. J. Prot. Struct., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 457–485, 2015.

G. Carta and F. Stochino, “Theoretical models to predict the flexural failure of reinforced concrete beams under blast loads,” Eng. Struct., vol. 49, pp. 306–315, Apr. 2013.

S. Lan, T. S. Lok, and L. Heng, “Composite structural panels subjected to explosive loading,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 387–395, 2005.

H. Y. Liu, B. Yang, and S. B. Kang, “Testing and analysis of composite floor systems under peripheral column removal scenarios,” Procedia Eng., vol. 210, pp. 261–268, 2017.

A. A. Nassr, A. G. Razaqpur, M. J. Tait, M. Campidelli, and S. Foo, “Experimental performance of steel beams under blast loading,” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., vol. 26, pp. 600–619, 2012.

W. Krätzig and R. Pölling, “An elasto-plastic damage model for reinforced concrete with minimum number of material parameters,” Comput. Struct., vol. 82, no. 15–16, pp. 1201–1215, Jun. 2004.

J. Qureshi and D. Lam, “Behaviour of headed shear stud in composite beams with profiled metal decking,” Adv. Struct. Eng., vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 1547–1558, 2012.

“Eurocode 2 : Design of concrete structures --- Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings.” British Standard Institute, London, UK, 2004.

ABAQUS, ABAQUS/CAE User’s Manual. Providance, USA.

J. Qureshi, D. Lam, and J. Ye, “The influence of profiled sheeting thickness and shear connector’s position on strength and ductility of headed shear connector,” Eng. Struct., vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 1643–1656, May 2011.

M. Chipley, M. Kaminskas, W. Lyon, D. Beshlin, and M. Hester, “Risk Management Series: Reference Manual to Mitigate Potential Terorrist Attacks Against Buildings,” FEMA, USA, FEMA 426, 2003.

C. Zheng, X. S. Kong, W. G. Wu, S. X. Xu, and Z. W. Guan, “Experimental and numerical studies on the dynamic response of steel plates subjected to confined blast loading,” Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 113, no. December 2017, pp. 144–160, 2018.

M. H. Shen, K. F. Chung, A. Y. Elghazouli, and J. Z. Tong, “Structural behaviour of stud shear connections in composite floors with various connector arrangements and profiled deck configurations,” Eng. Struct., vol. 210, no. September 2019, 2020.

Downloads

Published

2021-03-19

How to Cite

[1]
A. Alias and A. Amin, “Blast loaded steel-concrete composite slab”, J. Mech. Eng. Sci., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 7874–7884, Mar. 2021.