Performance of Evacuated Tube Solar Collector using Water-Based Titanium Oxide Nanofluid
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15282/jmes.3.2012.6.0028Keywords:
Solar Energy, Nanofluid, Evacuated Tube Solar CollectorAbstract
Experiments are undertaken to determine the efficiency of an evacuated tube solar collector using water-based Titanium Oxide (TiO2) nanofluid at the Pekan Campus (3˚32’ N, 103˚25’ E), Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University Malaysia Pahang, for the conversion of solar thermal energy. Malaysia lies in the equatorial zone with an average daily solar insolation of more than 900 W/m², which can reach a maximum of 1200 W/m² for most of the year. Traditionally water is pumped through the collector at an optimum flow rate, for the extraction of solar thermal energy. If the outlet temperature of the water is high, further circulation of the water through the collector is useless. This is due to the low thermal conductivity of water of 0.6 W/m.K compared to metals which is many orders higher. Hence it is necessary to reduce the surface temperature either by pumping water at a higher flow rate or by enhancing the fluid’s properties by the dispersion of nanoparticles. Pumping water at higher flow rates is not advantageous as the overall efficiency of the system is lowered. Liquids in which nanosized particles of metal or their oxides are dispersed in a base liquid such as water are known as 'Nanofluids'. This results in higher values of thermal conductivity compared to the base liquid. The thermal conductivity increases with the concentration and temperature of the nanofluid. The increase in thermal conductivity with temperature is advantageous for application in collectors as the solar insolation varies throughout the day, with a minimum in the morning reaching a maximum at 2.00p.m and reducing thereafter. The efficiency of the collector estimated using a TiO2 nanofluid of 0.3% concentration is about 0.73, compared to water which is about 0.58. The efficiency is enhanced by 16.7% maximum with 30–50nm sized TiO2 nanoparticles dispersed in the water, compared to the system working solely with water. The flow rate is fixed at 2.7 liters per minute for both liquids.
References
Badar, A. W., Buchholz, R., & Ziegler, F. (2011). Experimental and theoretical evaluation of the overall heat loss coefficient of vacuum tubes of a solar collector. Solar Energy, 85 (7), 1447-1456.
Choi, S. U. S., & Eastman, J. A. (1995). Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles. International mechanical engineering congress and exhibition, San Francisco, CA, USA, pp.1-8.
Das, S. K., Choi, S. U. S., Yu, W., & Pradeep, T. (2007). Nanofluids: science and technology. New York, Wiley-Interscience.
Duffie, J. A., & Beckman, W. A. (2006). Solar engineering of thermal processes. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
Gordon, J., & Society, I. S. E. (2001). Solar energy the state of the art. United Kingdom: International Solar Energy Society.
Hwang, Y. J., Ahn, Y. C., Shin, H. S., Lee, C .G., Kim, G. T., Park, H. S., & Lee, J. K. (2006). Investigation on characteristics of thermal conductivity enhancement of nanofluids. Current Applied Physics, 6 (6), 1068-1071.
Lee, S., Choi, S. U. S., Li, S., & Eastman, J. A. (1999). Measuring thermal conductivity of fluids containing oxide nanoparticles. Journal of Heat Transfer, 121 (2), 280-289.
Morrison, G. L., Budihardjo, I., & Behnia, M. (2005). Measurement and simulation of flow rate in a water-in-glass evacuated tube solar water heater. Solar Energy, 78 (2), 257-267.
Natarajan, E., & Sathish R. (2009). Role of nanofluids in solar water heater. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 1-5.
Nayak, S. P. S. J. K. (2008). Solar energy: principles of thermal collection and storage. Tata, Singapore, McGraw-Hill.
Otanicar, T. P., Phelan, P. E., Prasher, R. S., Rosengarten, G., & Taylor, R. A. (2010). Nanofluid-based direct absorption solar collector. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 2 (3), 033102-033113.
Othman, M. Y. H., Sopian, K., Yatim, B., & Dalimin, M. N. (1993). Diurnal pattern of global solar radiation in the tropics: a case study in Malaysia. Renewable Energy, 3(6-7), 741-745.
Pak, B. C., & Cho, Y. I. (1998). Hydrodynamic and heat transfer study of dispersed fluids with submicron metallic oxide particles. Experimental Heat Transfer, 11 (2), 151-170.
Srinivasa Rao, G., Sharma, K. V., Chary, S. P., Bakar, R. A., Rahman, M. M., Kadirgama, K., & Noor, M. M. (2011). Experimental study on heat transfer coefficient and friction factor of Al2O3 nanofluid in a packed bed column. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences, 1, 1-15.
Syam Sundar, L., & Sharma, K. V. (2011a). An experimental study heat transfer and friction factor of Al2O3 nanofluid. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences, 1, 99-112.
Syam Sundar, L., & Sharma, K.V. (2011b). Laminar convective heat transfer and friction factor of Al2O3 nanofluid in circular tube fitted with twisted tape inserts. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering, 3, 265-278.
Yousefi, T., Veysi, F., Shojaeizadeh, E., & Zinadini, S. (2012). An experimental investigation on the effect of Al2O3–H2O nanofluid on the efficiency of flat-plate solar collectors. Renewable Energy, 39 (1), 293-298.
Zhou, L. P., Wang, B. X., Peng, X. F., Du, X. Z., & Yang, Y. P. (2010). On the specific heat capacity of CuO nanofluid. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 1-4.
Zhu, H. T., Lin, Y. S., & Yin, Y. S. (2004). A novel one-step chemical method for preparation of copper nanofluids. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 277 (1), 100-103.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2012 The Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
