Performance degradation analysis of a medium pressure superheater due to tube deactivation

Ahmad Syafiq Haqim; WAN AHMAD NAJMI  WAN MOHAMED; al Hassan Salami Tijjani

doi:10.15282/jmes.17.2.2023.3.0747

Authors

A.S. Haqim PETRONAS Chemicals Methanol Sdn Bhd, Rancha-Rancha Industrial Estate, 87000, Wilayah Persekutuan Labuan, Malaysia
W.A.N.W. Mohamed Efficient Energy Conversion Technologies, College of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia. Phone: +60355436277
A.S. Tijjani Efficient Energy Conversion Technologies, College of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia. Phone: +60355436277

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15282/jmes.17.2.2023.3.0747

Keywords:

Superheater, Steam, Flue Gas, Tube Deactivation, Plugging

Abstract

Steam is essential in petrochemical industries for the transportation of thermal energy and usage in some reforming process. Superheaters are heat exchangers that convert saturated steam to dry steam by utilizing waste heat from the flue gas stream. Medium pressure steam superheaters are prone to tube deterioration due to service at elevated temperatures and erosion from the presence of liquid phase in the steam, leading to tube plugging after tube failure. This reduces the overall surface heating area of the superheater. Relations between the tube plugging practice and the energy dynamics of the superheaters are important for engineers to identify the responses of the superheater for operation planning, and this issue has not been extensively explored academically. This article analyses the deterioration of superheater performance due to reduction of surface heating area based on operational data of a petrochemical steam generation line. The objective is to find relations between the effect of tube plugging on the states of both steam and flue gas streams, as well as its impact on the overall energy exchange. The operating conditions of a superheater at two separate service years, before (year 2014) and after (year 2017) tube plugging, were compared through the first law energy analysis. The average steam inlet temperatures were between 248 ^°C and 250 ^°C, at flow rates between 70 and 90 ton/hour. The analysis indicated that 0.3 to 0.8 % increase in inlet energy is required for every plugged tube to compensate for the reduction of heating surface. At 3 % reduction of heating surface area, the heat exchanger effectiveness decreases by an average of 11 % that also leads to a lower steam temperature output by approximately 6% from the design operating temperature. These results would assist steam engineers to analyse changes to the energy economics of the whole plant and decide the feasibility of replacing existing superheaters with new ones. Also, another significant finding to be considered by steam engineers is that the current practice of increasing the steam flow rate does not offset the loss of energy effectiveness due to tube plugging.

References

M. F. Remeli, L. Tan, A. Date, B. Singh, and A. Akbarzadeh, “Simultaneous power generation and heat recovery using a heat pipe assisted thermoelectric generator system,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 91, pp. 110–119, 2015.

S. H. Symoens et al., “State-of-the-art of coke formation during steam cracking: Anti-coking surface technologies,” Industrial Engineering Chemical Research, vol. 57, no. 48, pp. 16117–16136, 2018.

S. O. Oyedepo and B. A. Fakeye, “Waste heat recovery technologies: Pathwayto sustainable energy development,” Journal of Thermal Engineering, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 324–348, 2021.

Y. Han, H. Wu, Z. Geng, Q. Zhu, X. Gu, and B. Yu, “Review: Energy efficiency evaluation of complex petrochemical industries,” Energy, vol. 203, pp. 117893, 2020.

Y. V. Shatskikh, A. I. Sharapov, and I. G. Byankin, “Analysis of deep heat recovery from flue gases,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 891, no. 1, pp. 012188, 2017.

E. Woolley, Y. Luo, and A. Simeone, “Industrial waste heat recovery: A systematic approach,” Sustainable Energy Technology Assessments, vol. 29, pp. 50–59, 2018.

D. Gewald, K. Siokos, S. Karellas, and H. Spliethoff, “Waste heat recovery from a landfill gas-fired power plant,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 1779–1789, 2012.

T. Blumberg, T. Morosuk, and G. Tsatsaronis, “Exergy-based evaluation of methanol production from natural gas with CO2utilization,” Energy, vol. 141, pp. 2528–2539, 2017.

O. J. Khaleel, T. K. Ibrahim, F. B. Ismail, and A. T. Al-Sammarraie, “Developing an analytical model to predict the energy and exergy-basedperformances of a coal-fired thermal power plant,” Case Studies in Thermal Engineering., vol. 28, p. 101519, 2021.

I. Johnson, W. T. Choate, and A. Davidson, “Waste heat recovery: Technology and opportunities in U.S. industry,” Boston, Mar. 2008. [online] Available: https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1218716.

M. Granda, M. Trojan, and J. Taler, “CFD analysis of steam superheater, transient state,” in E3S Web of Conferences, vol. 128, p. 04009, 2009.

J. Purbolaksono, J. Ahmad, L. C. Beng, A. Z. Rashid, A. Khinani, and A. A. Ali, “Failure analysis on a primary superheater tube of a power plant,” Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 158–167, 2010.

R. K. Roy, S. K. Das, A. K. Panda, and A. Mitra, “Analysis of superheater boiler tubes failed through non-linear heating,” in Procedia Engineering, vol. 86, pp. 926–932, 2014.

G. K. Gupta and S. Chattopadhyaya, “Critical failure analysis of superheater tubes of coal-based boiler,” Strojniski Vestnik Journal of Mechanical Engineering, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 287–299, 2017.

A. Movahedi-Rad, S. S. Plasseyed, and M. Attarian, “Failure analysis of superheater tube,” Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 48, pp. 94–104, 2015.

P. Madejski and D. Taler, “Analysis of temperature and stress distribution of superheater tubes after attemperation or sootblower activation,” Energy Conversion and Management,vol. 71, pp. 131–137, 2013.

A. Sadeghianjahromi and C. C. Wang, “Heat transfer enhancement in fin-and-tube heat exchangers –A review on different mechanisms,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 137, 2021.

W. Zima, “Simulation of steam superheater operation under conditions of pressure decrease,” Energy, vol. 172, pp. 932–944, 2019.

I. H. Aljundi, “Energy and exergy analysis of a steam power plant in Jordan,” Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 29, no. 2–3, pp. 324–328, 2009.

S. Kumar, D. Kumar, R. A. Memon, M. A. Wassan, and S. A. Mir, “Energy and exergy analysis of a coal fired power plant,” Mehran University Research Journal in Engineering and Technology., vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 611–624, 2018.

J. Clay and J. Mathias, “Energetic and exergetic analysis of a multi-stage turbine, coal-fired 173 MW power plant,” International Journal of Exergy, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 419–436, 2018.

M. Elhelw, K. S. Al Dahma, and A. el H. Attia, “Utilizing exergy analysis in studying the performance of steam power plant at two different operation mode,” Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 150, pp. 285–293, 2019.

N. Bianco, A. Fragnito, M. Iasiello, and G. Maria Mauro, “A comprehensive approach for the multi-objective optimization of Heat Recovery Steam Generators to maximize cost-effectiveness and output power,” Sustainable Energy Technologies Assessment, vol. 45, p. 101162, 2021.

S. Begum, A. N. M. Karim, A. S. M. Zamani, and M. A. Shafii, “Wall Thinning and Creep DamageAnalysis in Boiler Tube and Optimization of Operating Conditions,” Journal of Mechatronics, vol. 1, pp. 1–6, 2013.

A. Saha, H. Roy, and A. K. Shukla, “Failure Investigation of a Final Super Heater Tube in a 140MW Thermal Power Plant,” Case Studies in Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 184–189, 2015.

J. Ahmad, J. Purbulaksono, L. C. Beng, A. Z. Rashid, A. Khinani, and A. A. Ali, “Failure investigation on rear water wall tube of boiler,” Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 16, no. 7,pp. 2325–2332, 2009.

M. Botha and M. P. Hindley, “One-way Fluid Structure Interaction modelling methodology for boiler tube fatigue failure,” Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 48, pp. 1–10, 2015.

D. Šeruga, M. Fajdiga, and M. Nagode, “Creep damage calculation for thermo mechanical fatigue,” Strojniski Vestnik Journal of Mechanical Engineering, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 371–378, 2011.

A. Saha and A. K. Shukla, “Failure of a Secondary Superheater Tube in a 140-MW Thermal Power Plant,” Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, vol. 14, no. 1. pp. 10–12, 2014.

American Society of Mechanical Engineers, ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code: I Rules for Construction of Power Boilers, 2013th ed. New York: ASME, 2013.

A. Hafid, M. Pancoko, andS. Pujiarta, “Analysis of the number of minimum tubesfor optimal operation in a heat exchanger RSG G.A. Siwabessy,” in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknologi Energi Nuklir, 2016, pp. 625–632.

R. B. Bird, W. E. Stewart, and E. N. Lightfoot, Transport Phenomena. Madison: John Wiley & Sons Inc, 2002.

Y. A. Çengel, M. A. Boles, and M. Kanoğlu, Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach, Ninth Edition. McGraw-Hill Education, 2019.

O. Nematollahi and K. C. Kim, “Real-gas effects: The state of the art of organic Rankine cycles,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 277, p. 124102, 2020.

E. Sanjari and E. N. Lay, “An accurate empirical correlation for predicting natural gas compressibility factors,” Journal of Natural Gas Chemistry, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 184–188, 2012.

J. Ren, F. Yang, D. Ma, G. Le, and J. Zhong, “Pneumatic performance study of a high-pressureejection device based on real specific energy and specific enthalpy,” Entropy, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 4801–4817, 2014.

C. Coskun, Z. Oktay, and N. Ilten, “A new approach for simplifying the calculation of flue gas specific heat and specific exergy value depending on fuel composition,” Energy, vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 1898–1902, 2009.

Y. A. Cengel, Heat Transfer: A Practical Approach, 2nd Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2002. [Online]. Available: www.LearnEngineering.in