Effect of pipe size on acetylene flame propagation in a closed straight pipe

Authors

  • S.Z. Sulaiman Faculty of Chemical and Natural Resources Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, 26300 Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia
  • R.M. Kasmani Faculty of Chemical Engineering & Energy Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Malaysia
  • A. Mustafa Faculty of Chemical Engineering & Energy Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Malaysia
  • S.K. Abdul Mudalip Faculty of Chemical and Natural Resources Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, 26300 Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia
  • R. Che Man Faculty of Chemical and Natural Resources Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, 26300 Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia
  • S. Md. Shaarani Faculty of Chemical and Natural Resources Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, 26300 Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia
  • Z.I. Mohd. Arshad Faculty of Chemical and Natural Resources Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, 26300 Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia
  • N.S. Noor Azmi Faculty of Chemical and Natural Resources Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, 26300 Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia
  • N.A.M. Harinder Khan Faculty of Chemical and Natural Resources Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, 26300 Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15282/jmes.11.4.2017.12.0278

Keywords:

Straight pipe; quenching; compression effect; flame acceleration; detonationlike event.

Abstract

The understanding of flame propagation mechanism in a tube or pipe as a function of scale is needed to describe explosion severity. Acetylene is an explosively unstable gas and will lead to a violent explosion when ignited. To achieve the goal, an experimental study of premixed acetylene/air mixture at stoichiometry concentration was carried out in a closed straight pipe with different sizes of L/D (ratio of length to diameter) to examine the flame propagation mechanism. Pipes with L/D=40 and 51 were used. From the results, it was found that the smaller pipe with L/D=40 enhanced the explosion severity by a factor of 1.4 as compared to that of the bigger pipe with L/D=51. The compression effect at the end of the pipe plays an important role to attenuate the burning rate, leading to higher flame speeds and hence, increases the overpressure. In the case of L/D=40, the compression effect is more severe due to the larger expansion ratio, and this phenomenon would decrease the quenching effect and subsequently promote flame acceleration. Fast flame speeds of up to 600 m/s were measured in the smaller pipe during explosion development. From the results, it can be seen that the compression effect plays a major role in contributing to the higher burning rate and affects the overall explosion and flame speed development. Furthermore, the compression effect is more severe in the smaller pipe that leads to the detonation-like event. This mechanism and data are useful to design a safety device to minimise explosion severity.

References

Gwak MC, Yoh JJ. Effect of multi-bend geometry on deflagration to detonation transition of a hydrocarbon-air mixture in tubes. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2013;38:11446-57.

Emami SD, Rajabi M, Che Hassan CR, Hamid MDA, Kasmani RM, Mazangi M. Experimental study on premixed hydrogen/air and hydrogen–methane/air mixtures explosion in 90 degree bend pipeline. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2013;38:14115-20.

Zhu C, Lin B, Jiang B. Flame acceleration of premixed methane/air explosion in parallel pipes. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 2012;25:383-90.

Noor MM, Wandel AP, Yusaf T. Effect of Air-Fuel Ratio on Temperature Distribution and Pollutants for Biogas Mild Combustion. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering. 2014;10:1980-92.

Noor MM, Wandel AP, Yusaf T. The simulation of biogas combustion in a mild burner. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences. 2014;6:995-1013.

Feroskhan M, Ismail S. A review on the purification and use of biogas in compression ignition engines. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering. 2017;14:4383-400.

Noor M, Wandel AP, Yusaf T. Effect of air-fuel ratio on temperature distribution and pollutants for biogas MILD combustion. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering. 2014;10:1980-92.

Noor M, Wandel AP, Yusaf T. The simulation of biogas combustion in a mild burner. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences. 2014;6:995-1013.

Phylaktou H, Foley M, Andrews GE. Explosion enhancement through a 90° curved bend. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 1993;6:21-9.

Gamezo VN, Ogawa T, Oran ES. Numerical simulations of flame propagation and DDT in obstructed channels filled with hydrogen–air mixture. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute. 2007;31:2463-71.

Gamezo VN, Ogawa T, Oran ES. Flame acceleration and DDT in channels with obstacles: Effect of obstacle spacing. Combustion and Flame. 2008;155:302-15.

Oppenheim AK. Dynamic Features of Combustion. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 1985;315:471-508.

Xiao H, An W, Duan Q, Sun J. Dynamics of premixed hydrogen/air flame in a closed combustion vessel. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2013;38:12856-64.

Teerling OJ, McIntosh AC, Brindley J, Tam VHY. Premixed flame response to oscillatory pressure waves. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute. 2005;30:1733-40.

Li Q, Lin B, Jian C. Investigation on the Interactions of Gas Explosion Flame and Reflected Pressure Waves in Closed Pipes. Combustion Science and Technology. 2012;184:2154-62.

Proust C. Gas flame acceleration in long ducts. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 2015;36:387-93.

Thomas GO. Flame acceleration and the development of detonation in fuel–oxygen mixtures at elevated temperatures and pressures. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2009;163:783-94.

Brown CJ, Thomas GO. Experimental studies of shock-induced ignition and transition to detonation in ethylene and propane mixtures. Combustion and Flame. 1999;117:861-70.

Liberman MA, Ivanov MF, Kiverin AD, Kuznetsov MS, Chukalovsky AA, Rakhimova TV. Deflagration-to-detonation transition in highly reactive combustible mixtures. Acta Astronautica. 2010;67:688-701.

Li J, Lai W, Chung K. Tube diameter effect on deflagration-to-detonation transition of propane–oxygen mixtures. Shock Waves. 2006;16:109-17.

Wu Y, Zheng Q, Weng C. An experimental study on the detonation transmission behaviours in acetylene-oxygen-argon mixtures. Energy. 2018;143:554-61.

Thomas G, Williams RL. Detonation interaction with wedges and bends. Shock Waves. 2002;11:481-92.

Wang C, Han W, Ning J, Yang Y. High resolution numerical simulation of methane explosion in bend ducts. Safety Science. 2012;50:709-17.

Blanchard R, Arndt D, Grätz R, Poli M, Scheider S. Explosions in closed pipes containing baffles and 90 degree bends. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 2010;23:253-9.

Chatrathi K, Going JE, Grandestaff B. Flame propagation in industrial scale piping. Process Safety Progress. 2001;20:286-94.

Xiao H, He X, Duan Q, Luo X, Sun J. An investigation of premixed flame propagation in a closed combustion duct with a 90° bend. Applied Energy. 2014;134:248-56.

Uchida M, Suda T, Fujimori T, Fujii T, Inagaki T. Pressure loading of detonation waves through 90-degree bend in high pressure H2–O2–N2 mixtures. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute. 2011;33:2327-33.

Karlovitz B, Denniston DW, Wells FE. Investigation in turbulent flames. Journal of Chemical Physics. 1951;19:541-7.

Lee JHS. Dynamic Parameters of Gaseous Detonations. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics. 1984;16:311-36.

Egerton A, Gates SF. Further Experiments on Explosions in Gaseous Mixtures of Acetylene, of Hydrogen and of Pentane. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character. 1927;116:516-29.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-31

How to Cite

[1]
S. Sulaiman, “Effect of pipe size on acetylene flame propagation in a closed straight pipe”, J. Mech. Eng. Sci., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 3095–3103, Dec. 2017.