CFD analysis of unsteady and anisotropic turbulent flow in a circular-sectioned 90° bend pipe with and without ribs: A comparative computational study

Authors

  • R. Chiremsel Department of Hydraulics, University of Batna 2, Research Laboratory in Applied Hydraulics, Constantine road N°53. Fesdis, Batna 05078, Algeria
  • A. Fourar Department of Hydraulics, University of Batna 2, Research Laboratory in Applied Hydraulics, Constantine road N°53 Fesdis, Batna 05078, Algeria
  • F. Massouh National Higher School of Arts and Crafts (ParisTech; ENSAM), Laboratory of Fluid Mechanics 75013, France
  • Z. Chiremsel Safety Department, University of Batna2, IHSI-LRPI, Constantine road N°53.Fesdis, Batna 05078, Algeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15282/jmes.15.2.2021.03.0628

Keywords:

RSM, unsteady flow, anisotropy function, Dean number, invariant anisotropy map

Abstract

The Reynolds–averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations were solved along with Reynolds stress model (RSM), to study the fully-developed unsteady and anisotropic single-phase turbulent flow in 90° bend pipe with circular cross-section. Two flow configurations are considered the first is without ribs and the second is with ribs attached to solid walls. The number of ribs is 14 ribs regularly placed along the straight pipe. The pitch ratios is 40 and the rib height e (mm) is 10% of the pipe diameter. Both bends have a curvature radius ratio, of 2.0. The solutions of these flows were obtained using the commercial CFD software Fluent at a Dean number range from 5000 to 40000. In order to validate the turbulence model, numerical simulations were compared with the existing experimental data. The results are found in good agreement with the literature data. After validation of the numerical strategy, the axial velocity distribution and the anisotropy of the Reynolds stresses at several downstream longitudinal locations were obtained in order to investigate the hydrodynamic developments of the analyzed flow. The results show that in the ribbed bend pipe, the maximum velocity value is approximately 47% higher than the corresponding upstream value but it is 9% higher in the case of the bend pipe without ribs. It was also found for both cases that the distribution of the mean axial velocity depends faintly on the Dean number. Finally, it can be seen that the analyzed flow in the bend pipe without ribs appears more anisotropic than in bend pipe with ribs.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-10

How to Cite

Chiremsel, R., Fourar, A., Massouh, F., & Chiremsel, Z. (2021). CFD analysis of unsteady and anisotropic turbulent flow in a circular-sectioned 90° bend pipe with and without ribs: A comparative computational study. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences, 15(2), 7964–7982. https://doi.org/10.15282/jmes.15.2.2021.03.0628

Issue

Section

Article