Numerical investigation of side arm gas volume fraction in two phase T-junction

A. Saieed; B. Sam; W. Pao; F. M Hashim

doi:10.15282/jmes.10.3.2016.9.0215

Authors

A. Saieed Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, 32610 Bandar Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia
B. Sam Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, 32610 Bandar Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia
W. Pao Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, 32610 Bandar Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia
F. M Hashim Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, 32610 Bandar Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15282/jmes.10.3.2016.9.0215

Keywords:

T-junction; liquid-gas separation; separation efficiency

Abstract

T-junction is commonly installed at the offshore production header as a separator to tap produced gas for downstream process operation. A major issue in the T-junction is the liquid carryover, where excessive liquid flows into the downstream process equipment causing the platform to trip. The primary objective of the present study is to determine the effect of ratio of side arm to main arm diameters on passive separation performance in T-junction. The analysis was carried out using Eulerian Multiphase model from ANSYS Fluent 16.1. The boundary conditions chosen for the inlet and two outlets of the T-junction were velocity inlet and volume fraction outlet flow, respectively. Likewise, pressure velocity coupling was achieved by using SIMPLE coupling scheme. Three different side to main arm diameter ratio and side to main arm length ratio of 0.2, 0.6, and 1.0 were investigated, with different gas velocities variation and inlet gas saturation. Investigation found that the gas volume fraction in the side arm cannot go beyond 90% irrespective of the variation of parameters such as gas to liquid velocity ratio, diameter ratio, length ratio, and mass split ratio. It was found that the amount of gas exiting through the side arm decreases by decreasing the initial gas saturation and gas to liquid velocity ratio. However, by decreasing the mass split ratio, more gas ends up in side arm. Likewise, in terms of geometrical aspects, increasing the T-junction diameter ratio and reducing the length ratio causes an increase in extraction of gas into side arm. It was also noticed that the highest fraction of gas in side arm was achieved when the diameter ratio was 0.6. Therefore, it can be said that maximum amount of gas can be received in side arm when diameter ratio is around 0.6, initial gas saturation and velocity ratio are high, and mass split ratio is small. This paper discusses some of the most important parameters that are involved in partial phase separation in a T-junction. In order to have a more overall insight of the phase separation phenomena, it is required to explore the effects of inlet and outlet pressures, surface roughness of the pipe interior, angle between side and run arm, curvature radius at the junction, and the viscosity of the operating fluids.

References

Rea S, Azzopardi B. The split of horizontal stratified flow at a large diameter T- junction. Chemical Engineering Research and Design. 2001;79:470-6.

Lahey R. Current understanding of phase separation mechanisms in branching conduits. Nuclear Engineering and Design. 1986;95:145-61.

Bergman DF, Tek MR, Katz DLV. Retrograde condensation in natural gas pipelines: American Gas Association; 1975.

Marti S, Shoham O. A unified model for stratified-wavy two-phase flow splitting at a reduced T-junction with an inclined branch arm. International Journal of Multiphase Flow. 1997;23:725-48.

Griston S, Choi JH. Two-phase flow splitting at side-branching tees. SPE Western Regional Meeting: Society of Petroleum Engineers; 1998.

Liu Y, Li W. Numerical simulation on two-phase bubbly flow split in a branching T-junction. International Journal of Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration. 2011;19:253-62.

Margaris DP. T-junction separation modelling in gas–liquid two-phase flow. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification. 2007;46:150-8.

Azzopardi B, Rea S. Phase separation using a simple T-junction. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition: Society of Petroleum Engineers; 2000.

Baker G. Separation and control of gas-liquid flows at horizontal T-junctions: University of Nottingham; 2003.

Wren EMK. Geometric effects on phase split at a large diameter T-junction: University of Nottingham; 2001.

Wren E, Baker G, Azzopardi B, Jones R. Slug flow in small diameter pipes and T-junctions. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science. 2005;29:893-9.

Azzopardi B. The effect of side arm diameter on phase split at T-junctions. SPE annual technical conference1999.

Hong K. Two-phase flow splitting at a pipe tee. Journal of Petroleum Technology. 1978;30:290-6.

Chen JL, He LM, Luo XM, Bai HT, Wei YH. Simulation of oil-water two phase flow and separation behaviors in combined T junctions. Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser B. 2012;24:848-57.

Pao W, Hashim FM, Ming LH, Ramli MF, Junoh AK, Roslan N, et al. Numerical investigation of gas separation in T-junction. AIP Conference Proceedings: AIP Publishing; 2015. p. 070001.

Saieed A BS, Pao W, Hashim FM, Norpiah RBM. A review of T-junction geometrical effect on two-phase separation. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 2016;11:14233-8.

Conte G, Azzopardi B. Film thickness variation about a T-junction. International Journal of Multiphase Flow. 2003;29:305-28.