Parametric study on the effects of pinch and approach points on heat recovery steam generator performance at a district cooling system

Authors

  • A. Nordin Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Petronas, Bandar Seri Iskandar, 31750 Tronoh, Perak, Malaysia
  • M.A. Abd Majid Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Petronas, Bandar Seri Iskandar, 31750 Tronoh, Perak, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15282/jmes.10.2.2016.17.0201

Keywords:

Approach point; efficiency; heat recovery steam generator; pinch point.

Abstract

Heat recovery steam generators are important equipment at district cooling plants. The capability of heat recovery steam generators in generating steam influences the steam absorption chiller’s performance. The steam generation capability of the heat recovery steam generators in turn is linked to the values of pinch point and approach point. Hence, a study on the pinch point and approach point for the heat recovery steam generators would be useful in understanding the effects of varying pinch point and approach point values to the heat recovery steam generators’ performance. In relation to this subject, a parametric study on the heat recovery steam generators was done. The study covered the effects of the pinch point and approach point on the following: mass flow rate of steam generated; exhaust heat temperature leaving the heat recovery steam generators; and the efficiencies of the heat recovery steam generators. The first law of thermodynamics was used for the analysis. Four scenarios were covered in the study: the effects of the pinch point and approach point on steam generation; the effects of the pinch point and approach point on the exhaust heat temperature leaving the heat recovery steam generators; the effects of the pinch point and approach point on the efficiency of the heat recovery steam generators; and the effects of the exhaust heat temperature of the gas turbine on the mass flow rate of steam. Operating data at Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS gas district cooling plant were used to validate the model. The results from the first scenario indicated that higher pinch point and approach point led to a decrease in the steam being generated. For the second scenario, the increase in pinch point and approach point resulted in higher exhaust heat temperature leaving the heat recovery steam generators. Meanwhile, for the third scenario, it was noted that there was only a minimal variation of the efficiency of the heat recovery steam generator when the pinch point and approach point were increased. The findings of the fourth scenario indicated that with higher gas turbine exhaust heat temperatures, there was an increase in steam being generated. Therefore, the findings could be useful for the plant to set the operating parameters for operating heat recovery steam generators.

References

Carazas FJG, Salazar CH, Souza GFM. Availability analysis of heat recovery steam generators used in thermal power plants. Energy. 2011;36:3855-70.

Zafirah MF, Mardiana A. Experimental investigation on the performance of an air-to-air energy recovery for building applications in hot-humid climate. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences. 2016;10:1857-64.

Nawi MRM, Mamat AMI, Ismail H. Numerical heat transfer analysis of waste heat exchanger for exhaust gas energy recovery. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences. 2015;8:1498-506.

Ayu TT, Hailu MH, Hagos FY, Atnaw SM. Energy audit and waste heat recovery system design for a cement rotary kiln in Ethiopia: A case study. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering. 2015;12:2983-3002.

Ibrahim TK, Rahman MM. Optimum performance improvements of the combined cycle based on an intercooler-reheated gas turbine. Journal ofEnergy Resources Technology. Transaction of ASME. 2015;137.

Ibrahim TK, Rahman MM. Study on effective parameter of the triple-pressure reheat combined cycle performance. Thermal Science. 2013;17:497-508.

Ibrahim TK, Rahman MM. Parametric simulation of triple-pressure reheat combined cycle: A case study. Advanced Science Letters. 2012;13:263-8.

Feng H, Zhong W, Wu Y, Tong S. Thermodynamic performance analysis and algorithm model of multi-pressure heat recovery steam generators (HRSG) based on heat exchangers layout. Energy Conversion and Management. 2014;81:282-9.

Zebian H, Mitsos A. A split concept for HRSG (heat recovery steam generators) with simultaneous area reduction and performance improvement. Energy. 2014;71:421-31.

Nadir M, Ghenaiet A. Thermodynamic optimization of several (heat recovery steam generator) HRSG configurations for a range of exhaust gas temperatures. Energy. 2015;86:685-95.

Tyagi K, Khan M. Effect of Gas Turbine Exhaust Temperature, Stack Temperature and Ambient Temperature on Overall Efficiency of Combine Cycle Power Plant. International Journal of Engineering and Technology. 2010;2(6):427-9.

Ong'iro A, Ugursal VI, Al Taweel AM, Walker JD. Modeling of heat recovery steam generator performance. Applied Thermal Engineering. 1997;17:427-46.

Butcher CJ, Reddy BV. Second law analysis of a waste heat recovery based power generation system. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2007;50:2355-63.

Ganapathy V. Industrial Boilers and Heat Recovery Steam Generators. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.; 2003.

Ahmadi P, Dincer I. Thermodynamic and exergoenvironmental analyses, and multi-objective optimization of a gas turbine power plant. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2011;31:2529-40.

Majid A, Amin M, A Sulaiman S, Ibrahim I, Baharddin Z. Causal Model for Peak and Off Peak Waste Heat Recovery for Chilled Water Production. 2012.

Shaharin A, Amin M, Majid A. Gas District Cooling in Malaysia. 2011.

UTP GPTD. 2003.

San JY. Second-law performance of heat exchangers for waste heat recovery. Energy. 2010;35:1936-45.

Downloads

Published

2016-09-30

How to Cite

[1]
A. Nordin and M. Abd Majid, “Parametric study on the effects of pinch and approach points on heat recovery steam generator performance at a district cooling system”, J. Mech. Eng. Sci., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 2134–2144, Sep. 2016.