A REVIEW OF NANOFLUID ADOPTION IN POLYMER ELECTROLYTE MEMBRANE (PEM) FUEL CELLS AS AN ALTERNATIVE COOLANT

Authors

  • Irnie Zakaria Alternative Energy Research Centre Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Mara 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Z. Michael Alternative Energy Research Centre Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Mara 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • W.A.N.W. Mohamed Alternative Energy Research Centre Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Mara 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • A.M.I. Mamat Alternative Energy Research Centre Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Mara 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • W.H. Azmi Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Universiti Malaysia Pahang, 26600 Pekan, Pahang, Malaysia
  • R. Mamat Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Universiti Malaysia Pahang, 26600 Pekan, Pahang, Malaysia
  • R. Saidur Center of Research Excellence in Renewable Energy King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals 31261 Dahran Saudi Arabia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15282/jmes.8.2015.10.0132

Keywords:

Thermal management; PEM fuel cell; Nanofluid

Abstract

Continuous need for the optimum conversion efficiency of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) operation has triggered varieties of advancements, namely in the thermal management engineering scope. Excellent heat dissipation is correlated with higher performance of a fuel cell, thus increasing its conversion efficiency. This study reveals the potential advancement in thermal engineering of a fuel cell cooling system with respect to nanofluid technology. Nanofluids are seen as a potential evolution of nanotechnology hybridization with the fuel cell serving as a cooling medium. The available literature on the thermophysical properties of potential nanofluids, especially on the electrical conductivity property, has been discussed. The lack of electrical conductivity data for various nanofluids in open literature was another challenge in the application of nanofluids in fuel cells. Unlike in any other thermal management system, a nanofluid in a fuel cell is dealt with using a thermoelectrically active environment. The main challenge in nanofluid adoption in fuel cells was the formulation of a suitable nanofluid coolant with heat transfer enhancement, as compared to its base fluid, but still complying with the strict limits of electrical conductivity as low as 2 mS/cm and several other restrictions discussed by the researchers. It is concluded that a nanofluid in PEMFC is advantageous in terms of both heat transfer and simplification of the cooling system through radiator size reduction and potential elimination of the deionizer as compared to the current PEMFC cooling system. However, there are challenges that need to be well addressed, especially in the electrical conductivity requirement

References

Barbir F. PEM Fuel Cells : Theory and Practice2005.

Faghi A, Guo Z. Challenges and opportunities of thermal management issues related to fuel cell technology and modeling. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2005;48:3891-920.

Larminie J, dicks A. Fuel cell systems explained: John wiley and sons ltd.; 2003.

Zhang G, Kandlikar SG. A critical review of cooling techniques in proton exchange membrane fuel cell stacks. international journal of hydrogen energy. 2012;37:2412-29.

Curtin S, Gangi J. 2013 Fuel cell technologies market report. washington DC: Breakthrough Technologies Institute; 2014.

Morikawa H, Kikuchi H, Saito N. Development and Advances of a V-Flow FC Stack for FCX Clarity. In: Honda R&D Co. L, editor.: SAE International; 2009.

Kim SC, Won JP, Park YS, Lim TW, Kim MS. Performance evaluation of a stack cooling system using CO2 air conditioner in fuel cell vehicles. International Journal of Refrigeration. 2009;32:70-7.

Choi SUS, Eastman JA, . Enhancing Thermal Conductivity of fluids with Nanoparticles. ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition. San Francisco, CA1995.

Syam Sundar L, Sharma KV. An experimental study on heat transfer and friction factor of Al2O3 nanofluid. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences. 2011;1:99-112.

Mahendran M, Lee GC, Sharma KV, Shahrani A. Performance of evacuated tube solar collector using water-based titanium oxide nanofluid. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences. 2012;3:301-10.

Hussein AM, Bakar RA, Kadirgama K, Sharma KV. Experimental measurements of nanofluids thermal properties. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering. 2013;7:850-63.

Ravisankar B, Tara Chand V. Influence of nanoparticle volume fraction, particle size and temperature on thermal conductivity and viscosity of nanofluids- A review. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering. 2013;8:1316-38.

Saidur R, Leong KY, Mohammad HA. A review on applications and challenges of nanofluids. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2011;15:1646-68.

Wang Y, Chen KS, Mishler J, Cho SC, Adroher XC. A review of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells: Technology, applications, and needs on fundamental research. Applied Energy. 2011;88:981-1007.

DOE-EERE DoE. Technical work-Fuel cell. Fuel cell Technology office; 2009.

Maes J-P, Lievens S. Method for fuel cell coolant systems. US2007.

Zakaria IA, Mustaffa MR, Mohamed WANW, Mamat AMI. Steady - State Potential Energy Recovery Modeling of an Open Cathode PEM Fuel Cell Vehicle. Applied mechanics and materials. 2014;465 - 466.

Cengel G. Heat and Mass Transfer : Fundamentals and Application. 4th ed: Mc Graw hills companies; 2011.

Hosseinzadeh E, Rokni M, Rabbani A, Mortensen HH. Thermal and water management of low temperature Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell in fork-lift truck power system. Applied Energy. 2013;104:434-44.

Hashmi SMH. Cooling Strategies for PEM FC Stacks. Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg; 2010.

Eaton ER, Boon WH, Smith CJ. Chemical base for fuel cell engine heat exchange coolant/antifreeze commprising 1’3_Propanediol. In: Patent US, editor. United States 2008.

Mock J, McMullen P, Mohapatra S. Fuel Cell Coolant Optimization and scale up. Dynalene Inc; 2011.

C.Mohapatra S. fuel cell and fuel cell coolant compositions. united state of america2006.

McMullen P, Mohapatra S, Donovan E. Advances in PEM Fuel Cell Nano-Coolant. 2013.

Peyghambarzadeh SM, Hashemabadi SH, Hoseini SM, Seifi Jamnani M. Experimental study of heat transfer enhancement using water/ethylene glycol based nanofluids as a new coolant for car radiators. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer. 2011;38:1283-90.

Eastman JA, Choi SUS, Li S, Yu W, Thompson LJ. Anomalously increased effective thermal conductivities of ethylene glycol-based nanofluids containing copper nanoparticles. Appl Phys Lett. 2001;78:718-20.

Murshed SMS, Leong KC, Yang C. Investigations of thermal conductivity and viscosity of nanofluids. International Journal of Thermal Sciences. 2008;47:560-8.

Lee S, Choi SU-S, Li S, Eastman JA. Measuring Thermal Conductivity of Fluids Containing Oxide Nanoparticles. JOURNAL OF HEAT TRANSFER. 1999.

Wang X, Xu X, Choi SUS. Thermal Conductivity of Nanoparticle–Fluid Mixture. Journal of Thermophysics And Heat Transfer. 1999;Vol. 13.

Xie H, Wang J, Xi T, Liu Y, Ai F, Wu Q. Thermal conductivity enhancement of suspensions containing nanosized alumina particles. J Appl Phys. 2002;91:4568-72.

Wang X-Q, Mujumdar AS. Heat transfer characteristics of nanofluids: a review. International Journal of Thermal Sciences. 2007;46:1-19.

Kwak K, Kim C. Viscosity and thermal conductivity of copper oxide nanofluid dispersed in ethylene glycol. Korea-Australia Rheology Journal. 2005;Vol. 17 pp. 35-40.

Syam Sundar L, Venkata Ramana E, Singh MK, Sousa ACM. Thermal conductivity and viscosity of stabilized ethylene glycol and water mixture Al2O3 nanofluids for heat transfer applications: An experimental study. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer. 2014;56:86-95.

Dynalene. Dynalene FC. In: Inc D, editor.2013.

Takashiba T, Yagawa S. Development of fuel cell coolant. Honda R&D technical review: Honda R&D C0.Ltd; 2009.

Elhamid MHA, Mikhail YM, Blunk RH, Lisi DJ. Inexpensive dielectric coolant for fuel cell stacks. US2004.

Ballard BPSI. FCgen®-1310 Fuel Cell Stack. 2012.

Sundar LS, Shusmitha K, Singh MK, Sousa ACM. Electrical conductivity enhancement of nanodiamond–nickel (ND–Ni) nanocomposite based magnetic nanofluids. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer. 2014;57:1-7.

McMullen P, Mohapatra S, Donovan E. Advances in PEM Fuel Cell Nano-Coolant. 2013.

Wong KFV, Kurma T. Transport properties of alumina nanofluids. Nanotechnology. 2008;19.

Ganguly S, Sikdar S, Basu S. Experimental investigation of the effective electrical conductivity of aluminum oxide nanofluids. Powder Technology. 2009;196:326-30.

Baby TT, Ramaprabhu S. Investigation of thermal and electrical conductivity of graphene based nanofluids. J Appl Phys. 2010;108.

Teng TP, Cheng CM, Pai FY. Preparation and characterization of carbon nanofluid by a plasma arc nanoparticles synthesis system. Nanoscale Research Letters. 2011;6:X1-11.

Sikdar S, Basu S, Ganguly S. Investigation of electrical conductivity of titanium dioxide nanofluids. International Journal of Nanoparticles. 2011;4:336-49.

Solanki JN, Murthy ZVP. Preparation of silver Nanofluids with High Electrical Conductivity. Journal of Dispersion Science and Technology. 2011;32:724-30.

Konakanchi H, Vajjha R, Misra D, Das D. Electrical conductivity measurements of nanofluids and development of new correlations. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. 2011;11:6788-95.

Baby TT, Sundara R. Synthesis and transport properties of metal oxide decorated graphene dispersed nanofluids. Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2011;115:8527-33.

Shen LP, Wang H, Dong M, Ma ZC, Wang HB. Solvothermal synthesis and electrical conductivity model for the zinc oxide-insulated oil nanofluid. Physics Letters, Section A: General, Atomic and Solid State Physics. 2012;376:1053-7.

Minea AA, Luciu RS. Investigations on electrical conductivity of stabilized water based Al2O3 nanofluids. Microfluidics and nanofluidics. 2012;13:977-85.

Kole M, Dey TK. Investigation of thermal conductivity, viscosity, and electrical conductivity of graphene based nanofluids. J Appl Phys. 2013;113:124308

Sarojini KGK, Manoj SV, Singh PK, Pradeep T, Das SK. Electrical conductivity of ceramic and metallic nanofluids. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2013;417:39-46.

Maxwell JC. A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism. Second edition ed. Cambridge, U.K.: Oxford University Press; 1904.

Bruggeman DAG. Berechnung verschiedener physikalischer Konstanten von heterogenen Substanzen. I. Dielektrizitatskonstanten und Leitfahigkeiten der Mischkorper aus isotropen Substanzen. Ann Phys Leipzig. 1935;24:636-79.

Yu L, Liu D. Study of the Thermal Effectiveness of Laminar Forced Convection of Nanofluids for Liquid Cooling Applications. Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology, IEEE Transactions on. 2013;PP:1-.

VincentWong K-F, Kurma T. Transport properties of alumina nanofluids. Nanotechnology 2008;19.

Baby TT, Ramaprabhu S. Investigation of thermal and electrical conductivity of graphene based nanofluids. Journal of Applied Physics. 2010;108.

Duangthongsuk W, Wongwises S. Measurement of temperature-dependent thermal conductivity and viscosity of TiO2-water nanofluids. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science. 2009;33:706-14.

Vajjha RS, Das DK. Experimental determination of thermal conductivity of three nanofluids and development of new correlations. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2009;52:4675-82.

Sharma P, Baek I-H, Cho T, Park S, Lee KB. Enhancement of thermal conductivity of ethylene glycol based silver nanofluids. Powder Technology. 2011;208:7-19.

Chandrasekar M, Suresh S, Chandra Bose A. Experimental investigations and theoretical determination of thermal conductivity and viscosity of Al2O3/water nanofluid. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science. 2010;34:210-6.

Lee SW, Park SD, Kang S, Bang IC, Kim JH. Investigation of viscosity and thermal conductivity of SiC nanofluids for heat transfer applications. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2011;54:433-8.

Yiamsawasd T, Dalkilic AS, Wongwises S. Measurement of the thermal conductivity of titania and alumina nanofluids. Thermochimica Acta. 2012;545:48-56.

Philip J, Shima PD. Thermal properties of nanofluids. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science. 2012;183–184:30-45.

Mahbubul IM, Saidur R, Amalina MA. Latest developments on the viscosity of nanofluids. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2012;55:874-85.

Bin Razali MZ, Khiar MSA, Zakaria IA, Mohamed WANW. Effect of temperature towards electrical conductivities of low concentration of AL2O3 nanofluid in electrically active cooling system. Control System, Computing and Engineering (ICCSCE), 2014 IEEE International Conference on2014. p. 444-8.

Zakaria I, Azmi WH, Mohamed WANW, Mamat R, Najafi G. Experimental Investigation of Thermal Conductivity and Electrical Conductivity of Al2O3 Nanofluid in Water - Ethylene Glycol Mixture for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Application. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer. 2015;61:61-8.

Zakaria IA, Michael Z, Ihsan Mamat AM, Najmi Wan Mohamed WA. Thermal and electrical experimental characterization of Ethylene Glycol and water mixture nanofluids for a 400w Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell. Control System, Computing and Engineering (ICCSCE), 2014 IEEE International Conference on2014. p. 641-6.

Ramos-Alvarado B, Li P, Liu H, Hernandez-Guerrero A. CFD study of liquid-cooled heat sinks with microchannel flow field configurations for electronics, fuel cells, and concentrated solar cells. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2011;31:2494-507.

Pandiyan S, Jayakumar K, Rajalakshmi N, Dhathathreyan KS. Thermal and electrical energy management in a PEMFC stack – An analytical approach. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2008;51:469-73.

Kandlikar SG, Lu Z. Thermal management issues in a PEMFC stack – A brief review of current status. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2009;29:1276-80.

Sohel MR, Khaleduzzaman SS, Saidur R, Hepbasli A, Sabri MFM, Mahbubul IM. An experimental investigation of heat transfer enhancement of a minichannel heat sink using Al2O3–H2O nanofluid. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2014;74:164-72.

Khaleduzzaman SS, Saidur R, Selvaraj J, Mahbubul IM, Sohel MR, Shahrul IM. Nanofluids for Thermal Performance Improvement in Cooling of Electronic Device Advanced Materials Research. 2014;832.

Naphon P, Nakharintr L. Heat transfer of nanofluids in the mini-rectangular fin heat sinks. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer. 2013;40:25-31.

Keshavarz Moraveji M, Mohammadi Ardehali R, Ijam A. CFD investigation of nanofluid effects (cooling performance and pressure drop) in mini-channel heat sink. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer. 2013;40:58-66.

Prasher R, Song D, Wang J, Phelan P. Measurements of nanofluid viscosity and its implications for thermal applications. Appl Phys Lett. 2006;89:133108.

Garg J, Poudel B, Chiesa M, Gordon JB, Ma JJ, Wang JB, et al. Enhanced thermal conductivity and viscosity of copper nanoparticles in ethylene glycol nanofluid. J Appl Phys. 2008;103:074301.

Azmi WH, Sharma KV, Sarma PK, Mamat R, Anuar S. Comparison of convective heat transfer coefficient and friction factor of TiO2 nanofluid flow in a tube with twisted tape inserts. International Journal of Thermal Sciences. 2014;81:84-93.

Downloads

Published

2015-06-30

How to Cite

[1]
I. . Zakaria, “A REVIEW OF NANOFLUID ADOPTION IN POLYMER ELECTROLYTE MEMBRANE (PEM) FUEL CELLS AS AN ALTERNATIVE COOLANT”, J. Mech. Eng. Sci., vol. 8, pp. 1351–1366, Jun. 2015.

Issue

Section

Review