Cohesive zone modelling of Mode III delamination using the edge crack torsion test

Authors

  • H.A. Israr Centre for Composites, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM, Johor Bahru, Malaysia
  • K.J. Wong Centre for Composites, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM, Johor Bahru, Malaysia
  • M.N. Tamin Centre for Composites, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM, Johor Bahru, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15282/jmes.11.1.2017.11.0232

Keywords:

Interlaminar fracture; Mode III; edge crack torsion; cohesive zone modelling.

Abstract

In the experimental studies of mode III delamination using the edge crack torsion test, the crack initiation and propagation measurement are always difficult. This information could be obtained through numerical modelling. The objective of this study is to propose a guideline to model mode III delamination behaviour using cohesive elements. Finite element models of an edge crack torsion specimen were developed based on the data from the literature. The delamination behaviour of the specimen along the pre-crack, which was located at the mid-thickness location, was modelled using cohesive elements. Through parametric studies, it was found that for reliable numerical modelling, a mesh size of 0.5 mm was suggested, which provided three elements in the cohesive zone. As for the interface strength, it was recommended to choose 80 MPa. In addition, a viscosity parameter of 1´10-3 was found to be a good choice for reasonable computational time and converged numerical results. Besides, the interface stiffness was suggested to be 4´106 MPa/mm. Furthermore, the fracture process zone contour revealed that the delamination was started at a normalised location of approximately 0.7. Not only that, the fracture energy and strain distribution plots have shown the delamination was mode III dominated within the normalised distance of 0.34-0.86. The results from this study suggested that cohesive zone modelling is a useful method for the detailed analysis of the mode III delamination of an ECT specimen. The numerical modelling approach suggested from this study could be applied to ECT specimens at various different initial crack lengths. It also has the potential to be used to simulate the mode III delamination of other various types of laminated composites.

References

Wang SS. Fracture mechanics for delamination problems in composite materials. Journal of Composite Materials. 1983;17:210-23.

Szekrényes A. The influence of crack length and delamination width on the mode-iii energy release rate of laminated composites. Journal of Composite Materials. 2011;45:279-94.

Khoshravan MR, Moslemi M. Investigation on mode iii interlaminar fracture of glass/epoxy laminates using a modified split cantilever beam test. Engineering Fracture Mechanics. 2014;127:267-79.

Browning G, Carlsson LA, Ratcliffe JG. Modification of the edge crack torsion specimen for mode iii delamination testing. Part ii – experimental study. Journal of Composite Materials. 2011;45:2633-40.

Mehrabadi FA, Khoshravan M. Mode iii interlaminar fracture and damage characterization in woven fabric-reinforced glass/epoxy composite laminates. Journal of Composite Materials. 2013;47:1583-92.

Pereira AB, de Morais AB, de Moura MFSF. Design and analysis of a new six-point edge crack torsion (6ect) specimen for mode iii interlaminar fracture characterisation. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 2011;42:131-9.

Johnston AL, Davidson BD, Simon KK. Assessment of split-beam-type tests for mode iii delamination toughness determination. International Journal of Fracture. 2014;185:31-48.

Davidson BD, Sediles FO. Mixed-mode i–ii–iii delamination toughness determination via a shear–torsion-bending test. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 2011;42:589-603.

Johnston AL, Davidson BD. Intrinsic coupling of near-tip matrix crack formation to mode iii delamination advance in laminated polymeric matrix composites. International Journal of Solids and Structures. 2014;51:2360-9.

López-Menéndez A, Viña J, Argüelles A, Rubiera S, Mollón V. A new method for testing composite materials under mode iii fracture. Journal of Composite Materials. 2016;50:3973-80.

Reeder JR. 3d mixed mode delamination fracture criteria - an experimentalist's perspective. Proceedings of American Society for Composites, 21st Annual Tehnical Conference. Dearborn, MI, US2006.

Zhao D, Wang Y. Mode iii fracture behavior of laminated composite with edge crack in torsion. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics. 1998;29:109-23.

Turon A, Dávila CG, Camanho PP, Costa J. An engineering solution for mesh size effects in the simulation of delamination using cohesive zone models. Engineering Fracture Mechanics. 2007;74:1665-82.

Ratcliffe JG. Characterization of the edge crack torsion (ect) test for mode iii fracture toughness measurement of laminated composites. 2004.

de Morais AB, Pereira AB, de Moura MFSF, Magalhães AG. Mode iii interlaminar fracture of carbon/epoxy laminates using the edge crack torsion (ect) test. Composites Science and Technology. 2009;69:670-6.

Salleh Z, Yusop MYM, Rosdi MS. Mechanical properties of activated carbon (ac) coir fibers reinforced with epoxy resin. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences. 2013;5:631-8.

Asgari Mehrabadi F. Analysis of pure mode iii and mixed mode (iii + ii) interlaminar crack growth in polymeric woven fabrics. Materials & Design. 2013;44:429-37.

Nazirah ZS, Abdul Majid MS, Daud R. Effects of elevated temperatures on glass-reinforced epoxy pipes under multi-axial loadings. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences. 2016;10:1846-56.

Ravi Sankar H, Srikant RR, Vamsi Krishna P, Bhujanga Rao V, Bangaru Babu P. Estimation of the dynamic properties of epoxy glass fabric composites with natural rubber particle inclusions. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering. 2013;7:968-80.

Jeffrey KJT, Tarlochan F, Rahman MM. Residual strength of chop strand mats glass fiber/epoxy composite structures: Effect of temperature and water absorption. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering. 2011;4:504-19.

Xie D, Waas AM. Discrete cohesive zone model for mixed-mode fracture using finite element analysis. Engineering Fracture Mechanics. 2006;73:1783-96.

Zhao L, Gong Y, Zhang J, Chen Y, Fei B. Simulation of delamination growth in multidirectional laminates under mode i and mixed mode i/ii loadings using cohesive elements. Composite structures. 2014;116:509-22.

LeBlanc LR, LaPlante G. Experimental investigation and finite element modeling of mixed-mode delamination in a moisture-exposed carbon/epoxy composite. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 2016;81:202-13.

Nguyen N, Waas AM. A novel mixed-mode cohesive formulation for crack growth analysis. Composite structures. 2016;156:253-62.

de Moura MFSF, Fernandez MVC, de Morais AB, Campilho RDSG. Numerical analysis of the edge crack torsion test for mode iii interlaminar fracture of composite laminates. Engineering Fracture Mechanics. 2009;76:469-78.

de Morais AB, Pereira AB. Mode iii interlaminar fracture of carbon/epoxy laminates using a four-point bending plate test. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 2009;40:1741-6.

Camanho PP, Davila CG, de Moura MFSF. Numerical simulation of mixed-mode progressive delamination in composite materials. Journal of Composite Materials. 2003;37:1415-38.

Sørensen BF, Goutianos S, Jacobsen TK. Strength scaling of adhesive joints in polymer–matrix composites. International Journal of Solids and Structures. 2009;46:741-61.

Harper PW, Sun L, Hallett SR. A study on the influence of cohesive zone interface element strength parameters on mixed mode behaviour. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 2012;43:722-34.

Mollón V, Bonhomme J, Elmarakbi AM, Argüelles A, Viña J. Finite element modelling of mode i delamination specimens by means of implicit and explicit solvers. Polymer Testing. 2012;31:404-10.

Daniel IM, Ishai O. Engineering mechanics of composite materials. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.

Krueger R. Development and application of benchmark examples for mode ii static delamination propagation and fatigue growth predictions. 2011.

Chen J, Ravey E, Hallett S, Wisnom M, Grassi M. Prediction of delamination in braided composite t-piece specimens. Composites Science and Technology. 2009;69:2363-7.

Allix O, Blanchard L. Mesomodeling of delamination: Towards industrial applications. Composites Science and Technology. 2006;66:731-44.

Zhao L, Gong Y, Qin T, Mehmood S, Zhang J. Failure prediction of out-of-plane woven composite joints using cohesive element. Composite Structures. 2013;106:407-16.

Johar M, Israr HA, Low KO, Wong KJ. Numerical simulation methodology for mode ii delamination of quasi-isotropic quasi-homogeneous composite laminates. Journal of Composite Materials. 2017:0021998317695414.

Islam MR, Beg MDH. Effects of reinforcing arrangement of kenaf fibres into unsaturated polyester for improved properties. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences. 2016;10:2020-30.

Ismail AE, Che Abdul Aziz MA. Tensile strength of woven yarn kenaf fiber reinforced polyester composites. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences. 2015;9:1695-704.

Fahmi I, Abdul Majid MS, Afendi M, Helmi EA, M Haameem JA. Low-velocity impact responses of napier fibre/polyester composites. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering. 2016;13:3226-37.

M Haameem JA, Abdul Majid MS, Afendi M, Haslan M, Fahmi I. Alkali treatment and thermal properties of napier grass fibres. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering. 2016;13:3238-47.

Fajrin J, Zhuge Y, Bullen F, Wang H. Flexural behaviour of hybrid sandwich panel with natural fiber composites as the intermediate layer. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences. 2016;10:1968-83.

Downloads

Published

2017-03-31

How to Cite

[1]
H.A. Israr, K.J. Wong, and M.N. Tamin, “Cohesive zone modelling of Mode III delamination using the edge crack torsion test”, J. Mech. Eng. Sci., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 2526–2538, Mar. 2017.