Utilising biomass for renewable energy production: optimal profitability evaluation from different processing routes

Authors

  • Abdulhalim Abdulrazik Faculty of Chemical & Natural Resources Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, 26300 Gambang, Pahang, Malaysia
  • Mohd Zulkifli Mohamad Noor Faculty of Chemical & Natural Resources Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, 26300 Gambang, Pahang, Malaysia
  • Muhamad Fariz Failaka Department of Process and Energy Management, PT Pupuk Kaltim, 75313 Bontang, Indonesia
  • Marwen Elkamel Department of Economics, University of Waterloo. N2L 3G1, Waterloo, Canada
  • Ali Elkamel Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Waterloo, N2L 3G1, Waterloo, Canada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15282/jmes.11.4.2017.8.0274

Keywords:

Wheat straws, biomass; energy production; bioethanol processing routes; mathematical model; optimisation; supply chain.

Abstract

Utilisation of biomass such as wheat straws for the renewable energy production is an attractive option for agricultural diversifications and sustainability targets. One of the possible energy products from wheat straws is bioethanol. Since bioethanol could be produced from different ways, the issue arises on how to select the most economical one. In this paper, four processing routes to convert the wheat straws into bioethanol were screened; i) pelletisation and gasification, ii) torrefied pelletisation and gasification, iii) dilute acidic hydrolysis and fermentation, and iv) concentrated acidic hydrolysis and fermentation. The objective was to develop optimisation models to evaluate these routes as find the one that would produce the highest annual profitability by considering the whole supply chain. A mathematical model for optimisation, classified as linear programming, was then formulated to consider the biomass blending requirements and profitability equation. Optimisation results showed that the conversion of wheat straws into bioethanol could be potentially exploited via the torrefied pelletisation and gasification route as they gave the highest profitability of $489,330 per year, in the view of the whole supply chain. This was followed by concentrate acidic hydrolysis and fermentation route of $ 472,500 per year, dilute acidic hydrolysis and fermentation route of $402,750 per year, and pelletisation with gasification route of $388,530 per year. The developed optimisation models have been successfully screened and selected the best processing route to produce bioethanol from the evaluated profitability. Since this was at the conceptual stage, further refinement of the model parameters will be needed to provide a more practical basis for comparison.

References

Georgieva TI, Mikkelsen MJ, Ahring BK. Ethanol production from wet-exploded wheat straw hydrolysate by thermophilic anaerobic bacterium Thermoanaerobacter BG1L1 in a continuous immobilized reactor. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 2008;145:99-110.

He J, Zhang W. Techno-economic evaluation of thermo-chemical biomass-to-ethanol. Applied Energy. 2011;88:1224-32.

Clarke S, Preto F. Biomass densification for energy production. A Report for Ontario Ministry of Agriculture Food and Rural Affairs. 2011.

Salvachúa D, Prieto A, López-Abelairas M, Lu-Chau T, Martínez ÁT, Martínez MJ. Fungal pretreatment: An alternative in second-generation ethanol from wheat straw. Bioresource Technology. 2011;102:7500-6.

Wang Q. Bioprocessing technologies in biorefinery for sustainable production of fuels, chemicals, and polymers. Green Processing and Synthesis2013. p. 637.

Alex Marvin W, Schmidt LD, Benjaafar S, Tiffany DG, Daoutidis P. Economic optimization of a lignocellulosic biomass-to-ethanol supply chain. Chemical Engineering Science. 2012;67:68-79.

Taouda H, Chabir R, Aarab L, Miyah Y, Errachidi F. Biomass and bioethanol production from date extract. Journal of Materials and Environmental Sciences. 2017;8:3093-8.

Abdulrazik A, Elsholkami M, Elkamel A, Simon L. Multi-products productions from Malaysian oil palm empty fruit bunch (EFB): Analyzing economic potentials from the optimal biomass supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017;168:131-48.

Gelson T, Francis M. E, Raymond L. H. Integrative investment appraisal of a lignocellulosic biomass-to-ethanol industry. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics. 2003;28:611-33.

Slade R, Bauen A, Shah N. The commercial performance of cellulosic ethanol supply-chains in Europe. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2009;2:3.

Wang L, Littlewood J, Murphy RJ. Environmental sustainability of bioethanol production from wheat straw in the UK. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2013;28:715-25.

Dunnett AJ, Adjiman CS, Shah N. A spatially explicit whole-system model of the lignocellulosic bioethanol supply chain: an assessment of decentralised processing potential. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2008;1:13.

Demirbas A. Combustion characteristics of different biomass fuels. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science. 2004;30:219-30.

Prabir B. Biomass gasification and pyrolysis: practical design and theory. Massachusetts, USA: Elsevier Inc.; 2010.

Bryan M. J, James M. E. Thermochemical properties of biomass fuels. california agriculture. 1985.

Jenkins BM, Baxter LL, Miles TR, Miles TR. Combustion properties of biomass. Fuel Processing Technology. 1998;54:17-46.

Parikh J, Channiwala S, Ghosal G. A correlation for calculating HHV from proximate analysis of solid fuels. Fuel. 2005;84:487-94.

Prabir B. Biomass gasification, pyrolysis and torrefaction: practical design and theory. Second Edition ed. San Diego, California: Elsevier Inc.; 2013.

Sadhukhan J, Ng KS, Martinez E. Biorefineries and chemical processes: design, integration and sustainability analysis; 2014.

Murillo-Alvarado PE, Ponce-Ortega JM, Serna-González M, Castro-Montoya AJ, El-Halwagi MM. Optimization of pathways for biorefineries involving the selection of feedstocks, products, and processing steps. Industrial & engineering chemistry research. 2013;52:5177-90.

Guidelines for Estimating Wheat Straw Biomass Production Costs. Manitoba Agriculture, Food and Rural Developement (MAFRD); 2016.

Jim L. Cellulosic ethanol from agricultural residues. Think Ahead. Think Sunliquid., by BiofuelsDigest. 2015.

Mupondwa E, Li X, Tabil L, Phani A, Sokhansanj S, Stumborg M, et al. Technoeconomic analysis of wheat straw densification in the Canadian Prairie Province of Manitoba. Bioresource Technology. 2012;110:355-63.

Literature review and study energy market alternatives for commercially grown biomass in Ontario. Ontario, Canada: PPD Incorporated; 2011. Retrived from https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/24909059/literature-review-and-study-energy-market-alternatives-ontario-.

Mohammad J. T, Keikhosro K. Acid-Based hydrolysis processes for ethanol from lignocellulosic materials: A review. BioResources. 2007;2:472-99.

George D. P, Maria C-N, Evan H, George S. Hydrogen production cost estimate using biomass gasification; 2011.

Harold B, Bram vdD. "Biosyngas" key-intermediate in production of renewable transportation fuels, chemicals, and electricity: optimum scale and economic prospects of Fischer-Tropsch plants. In: 14th European Biomass Conference & Exhibition 2005.

Design Case Summary: Production of mixed alcohols from municipal solid waste via gasification. U.S Department of Energy; 2010.

Subramani V, Gangwal SK. A review of recent literature to search for an efficient catalytic process for the conversion of syngas to ethanol. Energy and Fuels. 2008;22:814-39.

Huang C, Lai C, Wu X, Huang Y, He J, Huang C, et al. An integrated process to produce bio-ethanol and xylooligosaccharides rich in xylobiose and xylotriose from high ash content waste wheat straw. Bioresource Technology. 2017;241:228-35.

Mohd Azhar SH, Abdulla R, Jambo SA, Marbawi H, Gansau JA, Mohd Faik AA, et al. Yeasts in sustainable bioethanol production: A review. Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports. 2017;10:52-61.

Babiker ME, Aziz ARA, Heikal M, Yusup S, Hagos FY. Experimental and simulation study on steam gasification of phoenix-dactylifera date palm seeds. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering. 2016;13:3201-14.

Mosier N, Wyman C, Dale B, Elander R, Lee YY, Holtzapple M, et al. Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresource Technology. 2005;96:673-86.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-31

How to Cite

[1]
A. Abdulrazik, M. Z. . Mohamad Noor, M. F. Failaka, M. Elkamel, and A. Elkamel, “Utilising biomass for renewable energy production: optimal profitability evaluation from different processing routes”, J. Mech. Eng. Sci., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 3046–3057, Dec. 2017.

Similar Articles

<< < 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.