Flexural behaviour of hybrid sandwich panel with natural fiber composites as the intermediate layer

J. Fajrin; Y. Zhuge; F. Bullen; H. Wang

doi:10.15282/jmes.10.2.2016.3.0187

Authors

J. Fajrin Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Mataram, Mataram, NTB, Indonesia
Y. Zhuge School of Civil Engineering and Surveying, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia
F. Bullen School of Civil Engineering and Surveying, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia
H. Wang School of Civil Engineering and Surveying, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15282/jmes.10.2.2016.3.0187

Keywords:

Natural fibre composites; sandwich panel; hybrid; flexural behavior.

Abstract

Polymeric composites reinforced with natural fibers have raised more attention as the alternative building materials. In this work, natural fiber composites prepared from jute and hemp fiber were proposed for the intermediate layer of a hybrid sandwich panel. This paper presented the flexural behavior of the newly developed hybrid sandwich panel which included the comparison of the ultimate load, load-deflection behavior, load-strain behavior and failure modes. The study was designed as a single factor experiment where the performance of hybrid sandwich panels containing jute fiber composite (JFC) and hemp fiber composite (HFC) as the intermediate layer was compared to the control (CTR) which was a conventional sandwich panel without an intermediate layer. A static flexural test under a four-point bending load scheme was performed in accordance with the ASTM C 393-00 standard. Aluminium sheet was used as the skins, while expanded polystyrene (EPS) was employed for the core. The testing was performed using a 100 kN servohydraulic machine with a loading rate of 5 mm/min. The applied load, displacement and strains were obtained using data logger. The results demonstrated that the hybrid sandwich panel exhibited a more superior performance than the conventional sandwich panels. The intermediate layer contributed significantly to enhancing the load carrying capacity of the hybrid sandwich panel. The load carrying capacity of hybrid panel with the JFC intermediate layer was 29.60% higher than the conventional sandwich panel, and correspondingly 93.46% higher for the sandwich panel with the HFC intermediate layer. The hybrid sandwich panels also developed a much larger area under the load-deflection curve, indicating greater toughness. The introduction of intermediate layer helped the hybrid sandwich panels to sustain a larger strain prior to reach their ultimate loads, resulting in a higher deformation capability. Indentation and core shear were observed as the failure mode of the conventional sandwich panel. Meanwhile, core shear and delamination were identified as the failure mode of the hybrid sandwich panel.

References

Davies JM. Lightweight sandwich construction. London: Blackwell science; 2011.

Zenkert D. An introduction to sandwich construction. Solihull: EMAS; 1995.

Zhou D, Stronge W. Mechanical properties of fibrous core sandwich panels. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences. 2005;47:775-98.

Schwarts-Givli H, Rabinovitch O, Frostig Y. High-order nonlinear contact effects in cyclic loading of delaminated sandwich panels. Composites Part B: Engineering. 2007;38:86-101.

Moreira R, Rodrigues JD. Static and dynamic analysis of soft core sandwich panels with through-thickness deformation. Composite Structuctures. 2010;92:201-15.

Maleque MA, Radhi M, Rahman MM. Wear study of Mg-SiCp reinforcement aluminium metal matrix composite. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences. 2016;10:1758-64.

Kasim AN, Selamat MZ, Daud MAM, Yaakob MY, Putra A, Sivakumar D. Mechanical properties of polypropylene composites reinforced with alkaline treated pineapple leaf fibre from Josapine cultivar. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering. 2016;13:3157-67.

Fahmi I, Abdul Majid MS, Afendi M, Helmi EA, M. Haameem JA. Low-velocity impact responses of Napier fibre/polyester composites. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering. 2016;13:3226-37.

Icardi U, Ferrero L. Optimisation of sandwich panels with functionally graded core and faces. Compos Sci Technol. 2009;69:575-85.

Rocca S, Nanni A. Mechanical characterization of sandwich structure comprised of glass fiber reinforced core: Part 1. Composites in Construction: Third International Conference. France. 2005. p. 11-3.

Benayoune A, Samad AAA, Trikha D, Ali AAA, Ashrabov A. Structural behaviour of eccentrically loaded precast sandwich panels. Construction Building Materials. 2006;20:713-24.

Rejab M, Cantwell W. The mechanical behaviour of corrugated-core sandwich panels. Composites Part B: Engineering. 2013;47:267-77.

Rejab M, Ushijima K, Cantwell W. The shear response of lightweight corrugated core structures. Journal of Composite Materials. 2014;48:3785-98.

Russo A, Zuccarello B. Experimental and numerical evaluation of the mechanical behaviour of GFRP sandwich panels. Composite Structuctures. 2007;81:575-86.

Van Erp G, Rogers D. A highly sustainable fibre composite building panel. Proceedings of the international workshop on fibre composites in civil infrastructure–past, present and future. USQ, Australia. 2008. p. 1-2.

Fan H, Meng F, Yang W. Sandwich panels with Kagome lattice cores reinforced by carbon fibers. Composite Structuctures. 2007;81:533-9.

Masters I, Evans K. Models for the elastic deformation of honeycombs. Composite Structuctures. 1996;35:403-22.

Meraghni F, Desrumaux F, Benzeggagh M. Mechanical behaviour of cellular core for structural sandwich panels. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 1999;30:767-79.

Khan M. Compressive and lamination strength of honeycomb sandwich panels with strain energy calculation from ASTM standards. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering. 2006;220:375-86.

Baral N, Cartié DD, Partridge IK, Baley C, Davies P. Improved impact performance of marine sandwich panels using through-thickness reinforcement: experimental results. Composites Part B: Engineering. 2010;41:117-23.

Liu Q, Zhao Y. Effect of soft honeycomb core on flexural vibration of sandwich panel using low order and high order shear deformation models. Journal of Sandwich Structures and Materials. 2007;9:95-108.

Ismail AE, Che Abdul Aziz MA. Tensile strength of woven yarn kenaf fiber reinforced polyester composites. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences. 2015;9:1695-704.

Asif Iqbal AKM, Arai Y. Study on Low-Cycle Fatigue Behavior of Cast Hybrid Metal Matrix Composites. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering. 2015;11:2504-14.

Taufik RS, Adibah M NF, Muhamad MR, Hasib H. Feasibility Study of Natural Fiber Composite Material for Engineering Application. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences. 2014;6:940-8.

Jiang D, Shu D. Local displacement of core in two-layer sandwich composite structures subjected to low velocity impact. Compos Struct. 2005;71:53-60.

Kim J, You Y-C. Composite behavior of a novel insulated concrete sandwich wall panel reinforced with GFRP shear grids: Effects of insulation types. Materials. 2015;8:899-913.

Mamalis A, Spentzas K, Pantelelis N, Manolakos D, Ioannidis M. A new hybrid concept for sandwich structures. Composite Structuctures. 2008;83:335-40.

Roslan S, Hassan M, Rasid Z, Zaki S, Daud Y, Aziz S, et al. Mechanical properties of bamboo reinforced epoxy sandwich structure composites. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering. 2015;12:2882-92.

Adebisi AA, Maleque MA, Rahman MM. Metal Matrix Composite Brake Rotor: Historical Development and Product Life Cycle Analysis. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering. 2011; 4:471-80.

Bank LC. Composites for construction: structural design with FRP materials: John Wiley & Sons; 2006.

Sapuan S, Bachtiar D, Hamdan M. Flexural properties of alkaline treated sugar palm fibre reinforced epoxy composites. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering. 2010;1:79-90.

Ibrahim M, Sapuan S, Faieza A. Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Composites From Unsaturated Polyester Filled With Oil Palm Ash. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences. 2012;2:133-47.

Salleh Z, Yusop M, Rosdi M. Mechanical properties of activated carbon (AC) coir fibers reinforced with epoxy resin. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences. 2013;5:631-8.

Ismail AE, Aziz MCA. Tensile strength of woven yarn kenaf fiber reinforced polyester composites. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences. 2015;9:1695-704.

Fajrin J. Alternative Theoretical Frameworks for Hybrid Sandwich Panel with Intermediate Layer. Jurnal Rekayasa Sipil. 2015;11:1-11.

Fajrin J, Zhuge Y, Bullen F, Wang H. Significance analysis of flexural behaviour of hybrid sandwich panels. Open Journal of Civil Engineering. 2013;3:1-7.

Fajrin J. The Application of Statistical Design of Experiments to Study the In- Plane Shear Behaviour of Hybrid Composite Sandwich Panel. Civil Engineering Dimension. 2016;18:25-30.

Standard A. C393–00. Standard Test Method for Flexural Properties of Sandwich Constructions. ASTM C393. 2000.

Harte A-M, Fleck NA, Ashby MF. Sandwich panel design using aluminum alloy foam. Advanced Engineering Materials. 2000;2:219-22.

Baker AAB. Composite materials for aircraft structures: Virginia: Education Series; 2004.

Kuenzi EW. Flexure of structural sandwich construction. Wisconsin, USA.: United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Products Laboratory; 1958.

Daniel I. Influence of core properties on the failure of composite sandwich beams. Journal of Mechanics of Materials and Structures. 2009;4:1271-86.

Sharaf T, Shawkat W, Fam A. Structural performance of sandwich wall panels with different foam core densities in one-way bending. J Compos Mater. 2010;44:2249-63.

Mirzapour A, Beheshty MH, Vafayan M. The response of sandwich panels with rigid polyurethane foam cores under flexural loading. Iranian Polymer Journal. 2005;14:1082-8.

Somayaji S. Civil engineering materials. New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 1995.

Deshpande V. The design of sandwich panels with foam core. Lecture Notes, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK. 2002.

Tuwair H, Volz J, ElGawady MA, Mohamed M, Chandrashekhara K, Birman V. Testing and evaluation of polyurethane-based GFRP sandwich bridge deck panels with polyurethane foam core. Journal of Bridge Engineering. 2015;21:04015033.

Daniel IM, Abot JL. Fabrication, testing and analysis of composite sandwich beams. Composites Science and Technology. 2000;60:2455-63.

Gdoutos E, Daniel I. Failure modes of composite sandwich beams. Journal of Theoretical Application Mechanics. 2008;35:105-18.