Component mode synthesis and stochastic perturbation method for dynamic analysis of large linear finite element with uncertain parameters


  • D. Lamrhari EMII, ENSAM of Meknes, Moulay Ismail University, Meknes, Morocco
  • D. Sarsri LTI, ENSA of Tangier, Abdelmalek Essaadi University, Tangier, Morocco
  • M. Rahmoune LEMAA, FS & EST, Moulay Ismail University, Meknes, Morocco. Phone: +212663071618



Component mode synthesis, dynamix responses, FEM, perturbation method, uncertain parameters


In this paper, a method to calculate the first two moments (mean and variance) of the stochastic time response as well as the frequency functions of large FE models with probabilistic uncertainties in the physical parameters is proposed. This method is based on coupling of second order perturbation method and component mode synthesis methods. Various component mode synthesis methods are used to optimally reduce the size of the model. The analysis of dynamic response of stochastic finite element system can be done in the frequency domain using the frequency transfer functions and in the time domain by a direct integration of the equations of motion, using numerical procedures. The statistical first two moments of dynamic response of the reduced system are obtained by the second order perturbation method. Numerical applications have been developed to highlight effectiveness of the method developed to analyze the stochastic response of large structures.


M. Shinozuka, “Monte Carlo solution of structural dynamics,” Comput. Struct., vol. 2, no. 5–6, pp. 855–874, 1972.

S. Adhikari and C. S. Manohar, “Dynamic analysis of framed structures with statistical uncertainties,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 1999, doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990320)44:8<1157::AID-NME549>3.0.CO;2-5.

R. Li and R. Ghanem, “Adaptive polynomial chaos expansions applied to statistics of extremes in nonlinear random vibration,” Probabilistic Eng. Mech., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 125–136, 1998.

S. E. Pryse, A. Kundu, and S. Adhikari, “Projection methods for stochastic dynamic systems: a frequency domain approach,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 338, pp. 412–439, 2018.

A. Guerine, A. El Hami, L. Walha, T. Fakhfakh, and M. Haddar, “Dynamic response of a spur gear system with uncertain parameters,” J. Theor. Appl. Mech., vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 1039–1049, 2016.

A. Der Kiureghian and J.-B. Ke, “The stochastic finite element method in structural reliability,” in Stochastic structural mechanics, Springer, 1987, pp. 84–109.

Z. Lei and C. Qiu, “Neumann dynamic stochastic finite element method of vibration for structures with stochastic parameters to random excitation,” Comput. Struct., vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 651–657, 2000.

G. Muscolino, G. Ricciardi, and N. Impollonia, “Improved dynamic analysis of structures with mechanical uncertainties under deterministic input,” Probabilistic Eng. Mech., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 199–212, 2000.

S. Li, B. R. Mace, and J. S. Dhupia, “Modal approach to dynamic analysis of structures with attachments at uncertain locations,” J. Sound Vib., vol. 444, pp. 48–68, 2019.

R. R. Craig Jr and M. C. C. Bampton, “Coupling of substructures for dynamic analyses.,” AIAA J., vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 1313–1319, 1968.

S. Rubin, “Improved component-mode representation for structural dynamic analysis,” AIAA J., vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 995–1006, 1975.

N. Bouhaddi and J. P. Lombard, “Improved free-interface substructures representation method,” Comput. Struct., vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 269–283, 2000.

R. H. MacNeal, “A hybrid method of component mode synthesis,” Comput. Struct., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 581–601, 1971.

J.-B. Qiu, F. W. Williams, and R.-X. Qiu, “A new exact substructure method using mixed modes,” J. Sound Vib., vol. 266, no. 4, pp. 737–757, 2003.

H. He, T. Wang, G. Chen, D. Sun, and R. Sun, “A real decoupled method and free interface component mode synthesis methods for generally damped systems,” J. Sound Vib., vol. 333, no. 2, pp. 584–603, 2014.

R. El Maani, A. El Hami, and B. Radi, “Substructure/fluid subdomain coupling method for large vibroacoustic problems,” Struct. Eng. Mech., vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 359–368, 2018.

W. I. I. W. I. Mirza, M. N. A. Rani, M. A. Yunus, R. Omar, and M. S. M. Zin, “Alternative scheme for frequency response function measurement of experimental-analytical dynamic substructuring,” J. Mech. Eng. Sci., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 4946–4957, 2019.

M. N. M. Merzuki, M. R. M. Rejab, M. S. M. Sani, B. Zhang, and M. Quanjin, “Experimental investigation of free vibration analysis on fibre metal composite laminates,” J. Mech. Eng. Sci., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 5753–5763, 2019.

D. Sarsri, L. Azrar, A. Jebbouri, and A. El Hami, “Component mode synthesis and polynomial chaos expansions for stochastic frequency functions of large linear FE models,” Comput. Struct., vol. 89, no. 3–4, pp. 346–356, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2010.11.009.

D. Sarsri and L. Azrar, “Time response of structures with uncertain parameters under stochastic inputs based on coupled polynomial chaos expansion and component mode synthesis methods,” Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 596–606, 2016, doi: 10.1080/15376494.2015.1029155.

H. He, T. Wang, W. Chen, and C. He, “An improved component mode synthesis method for interval uncertainty analysis,” J. Vibroengineering, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 2844–2856, 2017.

D. Sarsri and L. Azrar, “Dynamic analysis of large structures with uncertain parameters based on coupling component mode synthesis and perturbation method,” Ain Shams Eng. J., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 371–381, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2015.03.005.




How to Cite

D. Lamrhari, D. Sarsri, and M. Rahmoune, “Component mode synthesis and stochastic perturbation method for dynamic analysis of large linear finite element with uncertain parameters”, J. Mech. Eng. Sci., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 6753–6769, Jun. 2020.