FEASIBILITY STUDY ON USING MCDM FOR E-VOTING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15282/ijsecs.8.2.2022.1.0098Keywords:
Voting system, Prioritization, Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM)Abstract
An online voting system is an election system that manages the election process. This is a medium for the voters to cast their votes. It is also being used to calculate the votes collected from the voters to choose the representative for their own faculty. A typical voting system is based on a single attempt for each candidate being voted. The voting does not reflect the criteria implies to the characteristic of the candidate that going to be the student leader. To be a student leader, the student should fulfil the requirement such as good academic results, interpersonal skills with society, involving in activities of university and etc. Although the current voting system is able to maximize the participation of the voters, the voters may blindly vote the ballots casually due to they do not know the details of the candidates and the result is low quality and low public’s trust in the selected candidate. In this study, the aim is to develop an interactive online voting system that have ranking feature with MCDM method which allow online voting system to collect high-quality
results from the voters. The Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) method is used in the voting system while choosing the candidate. MCDM can let the voters make decision making or selecting the candidate based on the criteria that suit the position. The study starts with the literature study on implementing MCDM for a voting system. Then, a survey will be made to get the users’ views
on the with and without implementation of the MCDM method in an online voting system. The expected result of the study is to investigate the current implementation of MCDM as a tool for decision making, then identify the possibility of adopting MCDM for the online voting system while choosing the representative for faculty students’ society. As a conclusion from the survey from the
users’ views, it shown that most of the users thinks that the system with the implementation with MCDM method is less time consuming and able to produce high quality result conpare to the current online voting system. Most of the respondents also stated that they are more preferring to use the online voting system with MCDM method in the future.
References
R. Riemann and S. Grumbach, "Distributed protocols at the rescue for trustable online voting", 2017
https://doi.org/10.5220/0006228504990505
Ž. Stević, D. Pamučar, A. Puška and P. Chatterjee. "Sustainable supplier selection in healthcare industries using a new MCDM
method: Measurement of alternatives and ranking according to COmpromise solution (MARCOS)." Computers & Industrial
Engineering, 140, 106231, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106231
F. SAEED. Electronic Voting System for Universiti Teknologi Malaysia’s Campus Election (e-Undi Siswa), pg2-4, 2016.
T. Puri, J. Singh and H. Kaushal. "Prototyping of Indian electronic voting machine." International Journal of Engineering
Research and Development, 13(5), 44-51, 2017.
A. Daghouri, K. Mansouri and M. Qbadou. The impact of IT investment on firm performance based on MCDM techniques.
International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 9(5), 4344, 2019.
X. Yang, X. Yi, S. Nepal, A. Kelarev and F. Han, "A secure verifiable ranked choice online voting system based on
homomorphic encryption." IEEE Access, 6, 20506-20519, 2018.
G. Kou, P. Yang, Y. Peng, F. Xiao, Y. Chen and F. E. Alsaadi. "Evaluation of feature selection methods for text classification
with small datasets using multiple criteria decision-making methods." Applied Soft Computing, 86, 105836, 2020.
F. Xiao. "A multiple-criteria decision-making method based on D numbers and belief entropy." International Journal of Fuzzy
Systems, 21(4), 1144-1153, 2019.
A. Mardani, A. Jusoh, E. K. Zavadskas, F. Cavallaro and Z. Khalifah. "Sustainable and renewable energy: An overview of
the application of multiple criteria decision making techniques and approaches." Sustainability, 7(10), 13947-13984, 2015.
A. Kolios, V. Mytilinou, E. Lozano-Minguez and K. Salonitis. "A comparative study of multiple-criteria decision-making
methods under stochastic inputs." Energies, 9(7), 566, 2016.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 ROZLINA MOHAMED, SUIT YAN NG
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.