Effect of blending ratio on temperature profile and syngas composition of woody biomass co-gasification

Authors

  • S.A. Sulaiman Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, 32610 Bandar Seri Iskandar, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia
  • M. Inayat Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, 32610 Bandar Seri Iskandar, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia
  • H. Basri Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, 32610 Bandar Seri Iskandar, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia
  • F.M. Guangul Department of Mechanical Engineering, Middle East College, Knowledge Oasis Muscat, P.B. No. 79, Al Rusayl, Postal Code: 124, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman
  • S.M. Atnaw Faculty of Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, 26300 Gambang, Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15282/jmes.10.2.2016.20.0204

Keywords:

co-gasification; blending ratio; temperature profile; syngas composition.

Abstract

Co-gasification of biomass is beneficial as only relying on one type of biomass causes interruption in gasification if the feedstock supply is disrupted for any reason. Therefore, co-gasification of different biomass materials is a potential way to overcome the problem. In this work, co-gasification of wood chips (WC) and coconut fronds (CF) was carried out in a downdraft gasifier at 400 L/min airflow rate. Three blends of WC/CF of 70:30, 50:50 and 30:70 ratios were considered with a maximum particle size of 2.5-3.0 cm. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of blending ratio on the temperature profile and syngas composition produced by the co-gasification of WC/CF blended feedstock. The results show that the temperature profile and syngas composition of 70:30 WC/CF blend was comparatively better. The average syngas composition of 70:30 WC/CF blend during steady state co-gasification operation was 20%, 12% and 3% for CO, H2 and CH4 respectively. Similarly, the average syngas composition of 50:50 WC/CF blend was around 21%, 8% and 0.7% for CO, H2, and CH4 respectively. While the 30:70 WC/CF blend encountered with bridging problem due to fibrous and low density CF. No more than 50% of fibrous and low density feedstock like CF is recommended in a blend for stable and progressive co-gasification.

References

Saidur R, Abdelaziz EA, Demirbas A, Hossain MS, Mekhilef S. A review on biomass as a fuel for boilers. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2011;15:2262-89.

Atnaw SM, Sulaiman SA, Yusup S. A simulation study of downdraft gasification of oil palm fronds using A SPEN PLUS. Journal of Applied Sciences. 2011;11:1913-20.

Omer AM. Built environment: Relating the benefits of renewable energy technologies. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering. 2012;5:561-75.

International Energy Agency. Bioenergy. Today in Energy. Washington, USA: Internatioal Energy Agency; 2013.

Sulaiman SA, Muhammad F. Karim, M. Nazmi ZM, Samson M. Atnaw. On gasification of different tropical plant-based biomass materials. Asian Journal of Scientific Research. 2013;6:245-53.

Atnaw SM, Sulaiman SA, Yusup S. Syngas production from downdraft gasification of oil palm fronds. Energy. 2013;61:491-501.

Ogi T, Nakanishi M, Fukuda Y. Gasification of Empty Fruit Bunch and Bagasse Using an Entrained-flow Mode Reactor. Journal of the Japan Institute of Energy. 2011;90 886-94.

Sulaiman SA, Balamohan S, Moni MNZ, Atnaw SM, Mohamed AO. Feasibility study of gasification of oil palm fronds. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences. 2015;9:1744-57.

Oh TH, Pang SY, Chua SC. Energy policy and alternative energy in Malaysia: Issues and challenges for sustainable growth. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2010;14:1241-52.

Ong HC, Mahlia TMI, Masjuki HH. A review on energy scenario and sustainable energy in Malaysia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2011;15:639- 47.

Ahmed II, Nipattummakul N, Gupta AK. Characteristics of syngas from co- gasification of polyethylene and woodchips. Applied Energy. 2011;88:165-74.

Pinto F, André RN, Franco C, Carolino C, Costa R, Miranda M, et al. Comparison of a pilot scale gasification installation performance when air or oxygen is used as gasification medium 1. Tars and gaseous hydrocarbons formation. Fuel. 2012;101:102-14.

Fermoso J, Arias B, Plaza MG, Pevida C, Rubiera F, Pis JJ, et al. High-pressure co-gasification of coal with biomass and petroleum coke. Fuel Processing Technology. 2009;90:926-32.

Hagos FY, Aziz ARA, Sulaiman SA. Study of syngas combustion parameters effect on internal combustion engine. Asian Journal of Scientific Research. 2013;6:187.

Hagos FY, Aziz ARA, Sulaiman SA. Trends of syngas as a fuel in internal combustion engines. Advances in Mechanical Engineering. 2014;6:401587.

Babiker ME, Aziz ARA, Heikal M, Yusup S, Hagos FY. Experimental and simulation study on steam gasification of phoenix-dactylifera date palm seeds. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering. 2016;13:3201- 14.

Mahgoub BKM, Sulaiman SA, Abdul Karim ZA. Performance Study of Imitated Syngas in a Dual-Fuel Compression Ignition Diesel Engine. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering. 2015;11:2282-93.

Muda N, Boosroh MH. Gasification of Coal-Petcoke Blends in a Pilot Scale Gasification Plant. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering. 2013;8:1457-66.

Li K, Zhang R, Bi J. Experimental study on syngas production by co-gasification of coal and biomass in a fluidized bed. International journal of hydrogen energy. 2010;35:2722-6.

Inayat M, Sulaiman SA, Abd Jamil A, Guangul FM, Atnaw SM. The Study of Temperature Profile and Syngas Flare in Co-gasification of Biomass Feedstock in Throated Downdraft Gasifier. In: Hashim MA, editor. International Conference on Global Sustainability and Chemical Engineering 2014. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Springer Singapore; 2015. p. 203-10.

Skoulou V, Zabaniotou A, Stavropoulos G, Sakelaropoulos G. Syngas production from olive tree cuttings and olive kernels in a downdraft fixed-bed gasifier. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2008;33:1185-94.

McKendry P. Energy production from Biomass (Part 3): Gasification technologies. Bioresource Technology. 2002;83:55-63.

Asadullah M. Barriers of commercial power generation using biomass gasification gas: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2014;29:201-15.

Krerkkaiwan S, Fushimi C, Tsutsumi A, Kuchonthara P. Synergetic effect during co-pyrolysis/gasification of biomass and sub-bituminous coal. Fuel Processing Technology. 2013;115:11-8.

ASTM. ASTM Standard D3176-09 Standard Practice for Ultimate Analysis of Coal and Coke. West Conshohocken: ASTM International; 2009.

ASTM. ASTM E1131-08. Standard Test Method for Compositional Analysis by Thermogravimetry. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2014.

ASTM. ASTM Standard D4809-00. Standard Test Method for Heat of Combustion of Liquid Hydrocarbon Fuels by Bomb Calorimeter (Precision Method). Pennsylvania, USA: ASTM International; 2013.

Encinar JM, González JF, Rodrı́guez JJ, Ramiro MaJ. Catalysed and uncatalysed steam gasification of eucalyptus char: influence of variables and kinetic study. Fuel. 2001;80:2025-36.

Midilli A, Dogru M, R. Howarth C, Ayhan T. Hydrogen production from hazelnut shell by applying air-blown downdraft gasification technique. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2001;26:29-37.

Lucas C, Szewczyk D, Blasiak W, Mochida S. High-temperature air and steam gasification of densified biofuels. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2004;27:563-75.

Guangul FM, Sulaiman SA, Ramli A. Temperature profile and producer gas composition of high temperature air gasification of oil palm fronds. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2013;16:012067.

Guangul FM, Sulaiman SA. Mitigation of Bridging Problem in Biomass Gasificatrion by a Novel Approach. Asian Journal of Scientific Research. 2013;6:331-8.

Downloads

Published

2016-09-30

How to Cite

[1]
S. Sulaiman, M. Inayat, H. Basri, F. Guangul, and S. Atnaw, “Effect of blending ratio on temperature profile and syngas composition of woody biomass co-gasification”, J. Mech. Eng. Sci., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 2176–2186, Sep. 2016.