Numerical investigation of drag reduction in a Class 5 medium duty truck

M. Norouzi; M.A. Pooladi; M. Mahmoudi

doi:10.15282/jmes.10.3.2016.15.0221

Authors

M. Norouzi Mechanical Engineering Department, Shahrood University of Technology, Iran
M.A. Pooladi Islamic Azad University of Kish International Branch, Iran
M. Mahmoudi Mechanical Engineering Department, Isfahan University of Technology, Iran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15282/jmes.10.3.2016.15.0221

Keywords:

Aerodynamic, Drag reduction; Class 5 truck.

Abstract

In the present paper, the three-dimensional numerical investigation of Class 5 medium duty trucks (based on a production of Volvo Company) is carried out. The aim is to investigate and provide additional insights about the drag reduction methods in medium duty trucks. The flow field and pressure distribution around the truck were simulated using the Finite Volume Method. The Simple algorithm was employed to couple the pressure and momentum. A constant velocity of 30 m/s was set in the inlet, the non-slip condition in conjugation with a wall function were used on the truck and ground surfaces, and the pressure-outlet was applied at the outlet. For the turbulent regime, the well-known standard k-ε model was used to simulate the turbulent flow characteristics. The effects of vortexes around the vehicle on the drag coefficient were studied. Also, some passive devices such as standard and large windbreakers, convex roof, and the axial channel were considered for drag reduction at a high velocity (30 m/s) and standard atmospheric conditions (T=25℃, p=1 atm). The results showed that the large windbreakers and covering the gap between the trailer and the container are not suitable successors for standard windbreakers. Furthermore, it was found that the convex roof is a suitable passive or active device for notable drag reduction (25%). Some recommendations for future works might include investigating the effect of combinations of different devices on the drag reduction, studying the different underbody devices like side skirts, and using more sophisticated turbulent models such as large eddy simulation.

References

Håkansson C, Lenngren M. CFD Analysis of Aerodynamic Trailer Devices for Drag Redution of Heavy Duty Trucks: Chalmers University of Technology; 2010.

Salari K. DOE’s effort to reduce truck aerodynamic drag through joint experiments and computations. LLNLPRES-401649 Presentation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. 2009;28.

Isaev S, Gortyshov YF, Gureev V, Opara YS, Popov I. A Method of Decreasing the Drag of a Heavy-Duty Truck with the Use of Front and Stern Board Generators of Large-Scale Vortices. Journal of Engineering Physics and Thermophysics. 2015;88:200-6.

McAuliffe BR. Improving the aerodynamic efficiency of heavy duty vehicles: wind tunnel test results of trailer-based drag-reduction technologies. Report (Aerospace (Canada). Aerodynamics Laboratory), 2015-07-22; 2015.

Vegendla P, Saha R, Sofu T, Hwang L-K. Comparison of aerodynamic drag and underhood thermal analysis of two heavy-duty vehicles. International Journal of Aerodynamics. 2016;5:105-24.

Abas M, Said MM, Abidin SZ, Zahari I. Simulation of Fuel Economy for Malaysian Urban Driving. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering. 2015;11:2306-16.

Wang Y, Wu C, Tan G, Deng Y. Reduction in the aerodynamic drag around a generic vehicle by using a non-smooth surface. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering. 2017;231:130-44.

Al-Garni AM. Measurements of the cross-flow velocity field in the wake of an idealized pickup truck model using particle image velocimetry. 14th International Symposium on Applications of Laser Techniques to Fluid Mechanics Lisbon, Portugal2008. p. 1-10.

Wang D, Wang Y, Han Y, Dang Y, Fan D, Li L. Numerical Simulation of the Influence of Additional Aerodynamic Devices on the Aerodynamic Drag of Van- Body Truck. Proceedings of SAE-China Congress 2014: Selected Papers: Springer. 2015;15-26.

McArthur D, Burton D, Thompson M, Sheridan J. On the near wake of a simplified heavy vehicle. Journal of Fluids and Structures. 2016;66:293-314.

Manay E, Ozceyhan V, Sahin B, Gunes S. Edge length effect of bluff bodies on flow structure. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering. 2014;9:1793-1802.

Mohamed-Kassim Z, Filippone A. Fuel savings on a heavy vehicle via aerodynamic drag reduction. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 2010;15:275-84.

Ortega J, Salari K. An experimental study of drag reduction devices for a trailer underbody and base. 34th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit. Portland, OR, United States.2004;1-15.

Hyams DG, Sreenivas K, Pankajakshan R, Nichols DS, Briley WR, Whitfield DL. Computational simulation of model and full scale Class 8 trucks with drag reduction devices. Computers & Fluids. 2011;41:27-40.

QI X-n, LIU Y-q, DU G-s. Experimental and numerical studies of aerodynamic performance of trucks. Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser B. 2011;23:752-8.

HU X-j, Peng Q, Lei L, Peng G, WANG J-y, Bo Y. Numerical simulation of the aerodynamic characteristics of heavy-duty trucks through viaduct in crosswind. Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser B. 2014;26:394-9.

Verzicco R, Fatica M, Iaccarino G, Moin P, Khalighi B. Large eddy simulation of a road vehicle with drag-reduction devices. AIAA Journal. 2002;40:2447-55.

Yang HB, Hu XJ, Li TF. Numerical analyses to investigate the impact of external sun visor on Aerodynamic drag of heavy-duty commercial truck. Applied Mechanics and Materials: Trans Tech Publ; 2014. p. 787-90.

Selenbas B, Gunes H, Gocmen K, Bahceci U, Bayram B. An aerodynamic design and optimization of a heavy truck for drag reduction. ASME 2010 10th Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis. Istanbul, Turkey: American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2010. p. 121-9.

Doost AK, Yazdi AMSZ. Green nature and reducing of air pollution with vehicle drag coefficient correction. Advances in Energy Engineering. 2013;1:28-33.

Skea A, Bullen P, Qiao J. Underbody aerodynamics: Using CFD to simulate the airflow around a rotating wheel of a passenger car. Auto tech, Birmingham. 1999.

Hwang BG, Lee S, Lee EJ, Kim JJ, Kim M, You D, et al. Reduction of drag in heavy vehicles with two different types of advanced side skirts. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2016;155:36-46.

Spike CG, Finn TJ, Dubreuil EM, Wessner AK, Lee S-J. Reduction of Aerodynamic Drag on a Commercial Pickup Truck via External Flow Devices. 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. San Diego, California, USA2016. p. 1107.

Wilcox DC. Turbulence modeling for CFD. Third ed. San Diego, California, USA: Birmingham Press; 2006.

Pinzon C, Agarwal R. An Experimental and Computational Study of a Zero-Net- Mass-Flux (ZNMF) Actuator. 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reno, Nevada2008. p. 559.

Wang XY, Hu XJ, Liao L, Li TF. Numerical Simulation to investigate Influence of Additional Devices on Aerodynamic Drag for Heavy-duty Commercial Truck. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 2012;209:2089-93.

Guo P, Hu XJ, Zhu YY, Fu Q, Wang XY, Fan SJ, et al. Investigation on Aerodynamic Drag Reduction of Commercial Truck Based on External Styling of Cab. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 2013;307:186-91.

Das P, Tsubokura M, Matsuuki T, Oshima N, Kitoh K. Large eddy simulation of the flow-field around a full-scale heavy-duty truck. Procedia Engineering. 2013;56:521-30.

Nguyen TD, Souad H. PIV measurements in a turbulent wall jet over a backward- facing step in a three-dimensional, non-confined channel. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation. 2015;42:26-39.

Antony A. Tear Drop Design of Double Decker Bus For Improved Aerodynamics: Coventry University; 2012.

Yajima Y, Sano O. A note on the drag reduction of a circular cylinder due to double rows of holes. Fluid Dynamics Research. 1996;18:237-43.