Thermodynamic and exergic modelling of a combined cooling, heating and power system based on solid oxide fuel cell

Authors

  • J. Pirkandi Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Malek Ashtar University of Technology 15875-1774, Tehran, IRAN, Phone: +982122945141; Fax: +982122935341
  • A. M. Joharchi Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, West Branch of Azad University 1468763785, Tehran, IRAN
  • M. Ommian Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Malek Ashtar University of Technology 15875-1774, Tehran, IRAN, Phone: +982122945141; Fax: +982122935341

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15282/jmes.13.4.2019.23.0479

Keywords:

Solid oxide fuel cell, Absorption chiller, Entropy, Exergy

Abstract

In this research, thermodynamic and exergic analyses have been carried out on a combined cooling, heating and power cogeneration system that includes a solid oxide fuel cell and a single-effect lithium bromide absorption chiller. Results indicate that by increasing the system inlet air flow rate, the overall efficiency of the hybrid system is reduced, due to the reduction of the cell’s working temperature and exhaust gases temperature; while an increase in the working pressure of the system has no effect on its efficiency. The results also show that by raising the temperature of exhaust gases, the rate of exergy destruction diminishes, while the rate of exergy loss in the hybrid system increases. In the absorption chiller cycle, the maximum exergy destruction rate occurs in the generator, and the minimum rate is achieved in the pressure-reducing valve, between the evaporator and the condenser. Also, in the fuel cell cycle, the highest exergy destruction rate occurs in the heat exchanger of the inlet air to the cell, and the lowest exergy destruction rate occurs in the two water pumps. Moreover, the entropy generation rate and the exergy destruction rate of the fuel cell cycle are higher than those of the chiller cycle.

References

Onovwiona HI, Ugursal VI. Residential cogeneration systems: review of the current technology. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2006; 10(5): 389-431.

Liu M, Shi Y, Fang F. Combined cooling, heating and power systems: A survey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2014; 35: 1–22.

Pirkandi J, Ghassemi M, Hamedi MH, Mohammadi R. Electrochemical and thermodynamic modeling of a CHP system using tubular solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC-CHP). Journal of Cleaner Production. 2012; 29-30: 151-162.

Buonomano A, Calise F, Dentice d’Accadia M, Palombo A, Vicidomini M. Hybrid solid oxide fuel cells–gas turbine systems for combined heat and power: A review. Journal of Applied Energy. 2015; 156:32–85.

Velumani S, Guzmán CE, Peniche R, Vega R. Proposal of a hybrid CHP system: SOFC/microturbine/absorption chiller. International Journal of Energy Research 2010; 34:1088–1095.

Ozcan H, Dincer I. Thermodynamic analysis of an integrated SOFC, solar ORC and absorption chiller for tri-generation applications. Fuel Cells. 2013; 13:781–93.

Ranjbar F, Chitsaz A, Mahmoudi SMS, Khalilarya S, Rosen M. Energy and exergy assessments of a novel trigeneration system based on a solid oxide fuel cell. Energy Conversion and Management. 2014; 87: 318-327.

Zhao H, Ting Jiang T, Hou H. Performance analysis of the SOFC-CCHP system based on H2O/Li-Br absorption refrigeration cycle fueled by coke oven gas. Energy. 2015; 91: 983-993

Chitsaz A, Mehr AS, Mahmoudi SMS., Exergoeconomic analysis of a trigeneration system driven by a solid oxide fuel cell. Energy Conversion and Management. 2015; 106: 921–931.

Moussawi H, Fardouna F, Louahlia H. 4-E based optimal management of a SOFC-CCHP system model for residential applications. Energy Conversion and Management. 2017; 151: 607–629.

Jing R, Wang M, Brandon N, Zhao Y. Multi-criteria evaluation of solid oxide fuel cell based combined cooling heating and power (SOFC-CCHP) applications for public buildings in China. Energy. 2017; 141: 273-289.

Jing R, Wang M, Wang W, Brandon N, Li N, Chen J, Zhao Y. Economic and environmental multi-optimal design and dispatch of solid oxide fuel cell based CCHP system. Energy Conversion and Management. 2017; 154: 365–379.

Hou Q, Zhao H, Yang X. Thermodynamic performance study of the integrated MR-SOFC-CCHP system. Energy. 2018; 150: 434-450.

Gomri R. Second law comparison of single effect and double effect vapor absorption refrigeration systems. Energy Conversion and Management. 2009;50: 1279–1287.

Pirkandi J, Mahmoodi M, Ommian M. Thermo-economic performance analysis of a gas turbine generator equipped with a pressurized and an atmospheric solid oxide fuel cell. Energy Conversion and Management. 2017; 136: 249-261.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-30

How to Cite

[1]
J. Pirkandi, A. M. Joharchi, and M. Ommian, “Thermodynamic and exergic modelling of a combined cooling, heating and power system based on solid oxide fuel cell”, J. Mech. Eng. Sci., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 6088–6111, Dec. 2019.

Similar Articles

<< < 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.