An integrated experimental and numerical method to assess the fatigue performance of recycled rail

Authors

  • Y. L. Fan Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, 16419, Korea
  • N. Perera School of Engineering and the Built Environment, Faculty of Computing, Engineering and the Built Environment, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, B4 7XG, UK, Phone: +4401213315745
  • K. Tan Department of Mechanical and Construction Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Environment, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8ST, UK

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15282/jmes.13.4.2019.18.0474

Keywords:

Recycled rail, large scale system, fatigue testing, stepwise load increase test method

Abstract

Recycling of rail is practised in the railway industry to promote sustainability and economic efficiency. The functional reliability of recycled rail has to be addressed to ensure safe application. Studies on the reliability of railway rails place great emphasis on fatigue failure. However, scarcity of public domain data on recycled rails and limitation of experimental hardware capability has constrained the study on the fatigue of recycled rails. The aim of the investigation is to propose a novel integrated approach for exploring the fatigue performance of recycled rail effectively and efficiently. A high cycle fatigue test was conducted on a recycled rail specimen to obtain data for the validation of the finite element (FE) numerical model. Following this, the FE numerical model was incorporated with the stepwise load increase test (LIT) method. The integrated method gave a more conservative prediction of the fatigue performance than the analytical method. The shot blasting process induced compressive residual stress which affected the specimen’s fatigue performance. This result was demonstrated by the integrated method. Furthermore, this integrated method also successfully reduced the overall required test time. The predicted endurance limit of the specimen was 130.37MPa, accomplishing the BS EN 13674-1:2011 standard.

References

Worldsteel Assosiation. High-speed rail networks: A sustainable steel solution. 2015.

Taylor G. Lengthy Recycling. The Rail Engineer. 2012; 91: 38.

Network Rail Media Centre. Rail recycling depot to save network rail £4M a year. 2012.

British Standards Institution. BS EN13674-1:2011 Railway applications - Track – Rail Part 1: Vignole railway rails 46 kg/m and above. BSI, London. 2011.

Ekberg A, Åkesson B, Kabo E. Wheel/rail rolling contact fatigue – Probe, predict, prevent. Wear. 2014; 314: 2–12.

Nouguier-Lehon C, Zarwel M, Diviani C, Hertz D, Zahouani H, Hoc T. Surface impact analysis in shot peening process. Wear. 2013; 302: 1058-1063.

Benedetti M, Fontanari V, Winiarski B, et al. Fatigue behaviour of shot peened notched specimens: effect of the residual stress field ahead of the notch root. Procedia Engingeering. 2015;109:80–88.

Dalaei K, Karlsson B, Svensson L-E. Stability of shot peening induced residual stresses and their influence on fatigue lifetime. Materials Science and Engineering. 2011; A528:1008–1015.

Dalaei K, Karlsson B, Svensson L-E. Stability of residual stresses created by shot peening of pearlitic steel and their influence on fatigue behaviour. Procedia Engineering. 2010; 2:613–622.

Dalaei K, Karlsson B. Influence of shot peening on fatigue durability of normalized steel subjected to variable amplitude loading. International Journal of Fatigue. 2012;38:75–83.

Kim J, Cheong S, Nogichi H. Residual stress relaxation and low- and high-cycle fatigue behaviour of shot-peened medium-carbon steel. International Journal of Fatigue. 2013;56:114–122.

Azar V, Hashemi B, Yazdi MR. The effect of shot peening on fatigue and corrosion behaviour of 316L stainless steel in Ringer's solution. Surface & Coatings Technology. 2012;204:3546–3551.

Hansson T. Fatigue failure mechanisms and fatigue testing. NATO Science and Technology Organisation, Educational Notes RDP, RTO-EN-AVT-207-14. 2012; 1–23.

Casado JA, Carrascal I, Polanco JA, et al. Fatigue failure of short glass fibre reinforced PA 6.6 structural pieces for railway track fasteners. Engineering Failure Analysis. 2016;13:182–197.

Thomas C, Sosa I, Setien J, et al. Evaluation of the fatigue behaviour of recycled aggregate concrete. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2014;65:397–405.

Starke P, Walther F, Eifler D. ’PHYBAL’ a short-time procedure for a reliable fatigue life calculation. Advanced Engineering Materials. 2012;12(4):276–282.

Kucharczyk P, Rizos A, Munstermann S, et al. Estimation of the endurance fatigue limit for structural steel in load increasing tests at low temperature. Fatigue Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structure. 2012;35:628–637.

Imran M, Siddique S, Guchinsky R, et al. Comparison of fatigue life assessment by analytical, experimental and damage accumulation modelling approach of steel SAE 1045. Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structure. 2016;39:1138–1149.

Nicholas T. Step loading for very high cycle fatigue. Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structure. 2002;25:861–869.

Reis L, Li B, de Freitas M. A multiaxial fatigue approach to Rolling Contact Fatigue in railways. International Journal of Fatigue. 2014;67:191–202.

Guechichia H, Benkabouchea S, Amroucheb A, et al. A high fatigue life prediction methodology under constant amplitude multiaxial proportional loadings. Materials Science and Engineering. 2011; A528:4789–4798.

Słowik J, Łagoda T. The fatigue life estimation of elements with circumferential notch under uniaxial state of loading. International Journal of Fatigue. 2011;33:1304–1312.

Yunoh MFM, Abdullah S, Saad MHM, Nopiah ZM, Nuawi MZ. Fatigue feature extraction analysis based on a K-Means clustering approach. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences. 2015;8:1275-82.

Mohamed MA, Manurung YHP, Ghazali FA, Karim AA. Finite element-based fatigue life prediction of a load-carrying cruciform joint. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences. 2015;8:1414-25.

Fauzun F, Aqida SN, Naher S, Brabazon D, Calosso F, Rosso M. Effects of Thermal Fatigue on Laser Modified H13 Die Steel. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences. 2014;6:975-80.

Darrell FS. Fatigue-life Prediction Using Local Stress-Strain Concepts. Experimental mechanics. 1977;17(2):50–56.

Yates JK. Innovation in Rail Steel. Science in Parliament. 1996;53:2–3.

ANSYS, Inc. ANSYS mechanical APDL element reference. ANSYS Release 15.0 SAS IP, Inc. 2013.

Schmid SR, Hamrock BJ, Jacobson BO. Fundamentals of Machine Elements. Boca Raton: CRC Press. 2014.

Warren CY, Richard GB. Chapter 17 Stress concentration. Roark's formulas for stress and strain. New York: McGraw-Hill. 2002; 771–796.

Hsu T, Wang Z. Fatigue crack initiation at notch root under compressive cyclic loading. Procedia Engineering. 2010;2(1):91–100.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-30

How to Cite

[1]
Y. L. Fan, N. Perera, and K. Tan, “An integrated experimental and numerical method to assess the fatigue performance of recycled rail”, J. Mech. Eng. Sci., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 5988–6006, Dec. 2019.