Optimization of ultimate tensile strength of welded Inconel 625 and duplex 2205

Authors

  • S. Madhankumar Department of Mechatronics Engineering, Sri Krishna College of Engineering and Technology, Coimbatore, India, 641008 Phone: +91 8344483282; Fax: 0422-2678012
  • K. Manonmani Department of Mechanical Engineering, Alagappa Chettiar Government College of Engineering and Technology, Karaikudi, India, 630004
  • V. Karthickeyan Deparment of Mechanical Engineering, Sri Krishna College of Engineering and Technology, Coimbatore, India, 641008
  • N. Balaji Deparment of Mechanical Engineering, Sri Krishna College of Engineering and Technology, Coimbatore, India, 641008

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15282/jmes.15.1.2021.08.0608

Keywords:

Laser beam welding, Inconel 625 alloy, duplex 2205, ultimate tensile strength, microstructure

Abstract

The ultimate strength is an important property of any material for the manufacturing of components. This paper utilized the laser beam welding (LBW), due to its smaller dimension, which produces lesser distortion and process velocity is higher. Inconel 625 alloy and duplex 2205 stainless steel is having higher strength and corrosive resistance properties. Due to the above-mentioned properties, it could be used in oil and gas storage containers, marine and geothermal applications. This research work presents an investigation of various input variable effects on the output variable (ultimate tensile strength) in LBW for dissimilar materials namely, Inconel 625 alloy and duplex 2205 stainless steel. The input variables for this research are the power of a laser, welding speed, and focal position. The experimental runs are developed with the help of design of experiment (DOE) and utilized statistical design expert software. The ultimate tensile strength on different runs is measured using a universal tensile testing machine. Then from a response surface methodology and ANOVA, the optimum value of ultimate tensile strength was determined to maximize the weld joint and bead geometry. Finally, the confirmation test was carried out, it reveals the maximum error of 0.912% with the predicted value. In addition, the microstructure of the weld beads was examined using optical microscopy.

References

N. Kashaev, V. Ventzke, G. Çam, “Prospects of laser beam welding and friction stir welding processes for aluminum airframe structural applications,” Journal of Manufacturing Processes, vol. 36, pp. 571–600, Dec. 2018.

A. P. Costa, L. Quintino, M. Greitmann, “Laser beam welding hard metals to steel,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 141, no. 2, pp. 163–173, Oct. 2003.

L. K. Pan, C. C. Wang, Y. C. Hsiao, K. C. Ho, “Optimization of Nd:YAG laser welding onto magnesium alloy via Taguchi analysis,” Optics & Laser Technology, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 33–42, Feb. 2005.

K. Y. Benyounis, A. G. Olabi, M. S. J. Hashmi, “Effect of laser welding parameters on the heat input and weld-bead profile,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 164–165, pp. 978–985, May 2005.

A.-M. El-Batahgy, Laser Beam Welding of Austenitic Stainless Steels – Similar Butt and Dissimilar Lap Joints. 2012.

D. Grevey, P. Sallamand, E. Cicala, S. Ignat, “Gas protection optimization during Nd:YAG laser welding,” Optics & Laser Technology, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 647–651, Nov. 2005.

S. D. Sabdin, N. I. S. Hussein, M. K. Sued, M. S. Ayob, M. A. S. A. Rahim, M. Fadzil, “Effects of ColdArc welding parameters on the tensile strengths of high strength steel plate investigated using the Taguchi approach,” Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 4846–4856, 2019.

J. R. Berretta, W. de Rossi, M. David Martins das Neves, I. Alves de Almeida, N. Dias Vieira Junior, “Pulsed Nd:YAG laser welding of AISI 304 to AISI 420 stainless steels,” Optics and Lasers in Engineering, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 960–966, Sep. 2007.

K. Y. Benyounis, A. G. Olabi, M. S. J. Hashmi, “Multi-response optimization of CO2 laser-welding process of austenitic stainless steel,” Optics & Laser Technology, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 76–87, Feb. 2008.

M. R. Nakhaei, N. B. Mostafa Arab, G. Naderi, “Application of response surface methodology for weld strength prediction in laser welding of polypropylene/clay nanocomposite,” Iranian Polymer Journal (English Edition), vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 351–360, 2013.

S. Madhankumar, R. Balamurugan, S. Rajesh, “Investigations on austenitic nickel-chromium based super alloys - Inconel 625 and Inconel 718 from material removal rate in micro electrochemical machining,” in AIP conference Proceeding, 2019, vol. 2128, p. 040009.

S. Emami, T. Saeid, R. A. Khosroshahi, “Microstructural evolution of friction stir welded SAF 2205 duplex stainless steel,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 739, pp. 678–689, Mar. 2018.

N. I. S. Hussein, S. Laily, M. S. Salleh, M. N. Ayof, “Statistical analysis of second repair welding on dissimilar material using Taguchi method,” Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 5021–5030, 2019.

C. Li, J. Huang, K. Wang, Z. Chen, Q. Liu, “Optimization of processing parameters of laser skin welding in vitro combining the response surface methodology with NSGA- II,” Infrared Physics & Technology, vol. 103, p. 103067, Dec. 2019.

S. Bhavsar, P. Dudhagara, S. Tank, “R software package based statistical optimization of process components to simultaneously enhance the bacterial growth, laccase production and textile dye decolorization with cytotoxicity study,” PLoS One, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1–18, 2018.

S. K. Behera, H. Meena, S. Chakraborty, B. C. Meikap, “Application of response surface methodology (RSM) for optimization of leaching parameters for ash reduction from low-grade coal,” International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 621–629, Jul. 2018.

I. Hanhan, R. Agyei, X. Xiao, M. D. Sangid, “Comparing non-destructive 3D X-ray computed tomography with destructive optical microscopy for microstructural characterization of fiber reinforced composites,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 184, p. 107843, Nov. 2019.

A. Mortezaie and M. Shamanian, “An assessment of microstructure, mechanical properties and corrosion resistance of dissimilar welds between Inconel 718 and 310S austenitic stainless steel,” International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping., vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 37–46, 2014.

G. N. Ahmad, M. S. Raza, N. K. Singh, and H. Kumar, “Experimental investigation on Ytterbium fiber laser butt welding of Inconel 625 and Duplex stainless steel 2205 thin sheets,” Optics & Laser Technology, vol. 126, no. September 2019, p. 106117, 2020.

S. Dev, K. D. Ramkumar, N. Arivazhagan, and R. Rajendran, “Investigations on the microstructure and mechanical properties of dissimilar welds of inconel 718 and sulphur rich martensitic stainless steel, AISI 416,” Journal of Manufacturing Processes, vol. 32, no. March, pp. 685–698, 2018.

W. Wang, Y. Lu, X. Ding, and T. Shoji, “Microstructures and microhardness at fusion boundary of 316 stainless steel/Inconel 182 dissimilar welding,” Materials Characterization, vol. 107, pp. 255–261, 2015.

Y. Zhang, H. Jing, L. Xu, Y. Han, L. Zhao, and B. Xiao, “Microstructure and mechanical performance of welded joint between a novel heat-resistant steel and Inconel 617 weld metal,” Materials Characterization vol. 139, pp. 279–292, 2018.

A. Kulkarni, D. K. Dwivedi, and M. Vasudevan, “Dissimilar metal welding of P91 steel-AISI 316L SS with Incoloy 800 and Inconel 600 interlayers by using activated TIG welding process and its effect on the microstructure and mechanical properties,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 274, no. July, p. 116280, 2019.

Downloads

Published

2021-03-08

How to Cite

[1]
S. Madhankumar, K. Manonmani, V. Karthickeyan, and N. Balaji, “Optimization of ultimate tensile strength of welded Inconel 625 and duplex 2205”, J. Mech. Eng. Sci., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 7715–7728, Mar. 2021.

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.