Promoting sustainable wastewater treatment operations: The role of lean practices and lean six sigma enablers

Effendi Mohamad; A. Ishak; H. Arep

doi:10.15282/jmes.18.3.2024.2.0799

Authors

E. Mohamad Faculty of Industrial and Manufacturing Technology and Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, 76100 Durian Tunggal, Melaka, Malaysia. Phone: +6062702571; Fax: +6062701047
A. Ishak Faculty of Industrial and Manufacturing Technology and Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, 76100 Durian Tunggal, Melaka, Malaysia. Phone: +6062702571; Fax: +6062701047
H. Arep Department of Environment Malaysia, 25 Persiaran Perdana, Persint 4, Federal Government Administrative Centre, 62574 Putrajaya, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15282/jmes.18.3.2024.2.0799

Keywords:

Lean, Lean six sigma, Wastewater, Structural equation model, Multi-group analysis, Enablers

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of Lean Six Sigma enablers (LSS_En), comprising strategy, environment, culture, resource, and linkage based on Sustainable Performance (Sus_Perf) in wastewater treatment plants of Malaysian and Multi-national Companies (MNCs), using data from 276 respondents. Additionally, the study examines the intervening impact of lean practices (LPs), specifically statistical process control, human resource management, and total productive maintenance, on this relationship. Employing partial least squares structural equation modelling, the analysis demonstrates a positive and significant impact of LSS_En on Sus_Perf, with β = 0.406, p = 0.001 for Malaysian companies, and β = 0.608, p = 0.001 for MNCs. Furthermore, the impact of LSS_En on LPs is also significantly positive in both types of companies, with β = 0.544, p = 0.001 for locals, and β = 0.546, p = 0.001 for MNCs, respectively. However, the relationship between LPs and Sus_Perf is insignificant in MNCs, with β = 0.126, p > 0.05, while Malaysian companies show a stronger impact with β = 0.418, p = 0.001. Multi-group analysis confirms that local companies excel in H3 with a significant difference of 0.289, p = 0.043. However, the intervening role of LPs in H4 shows no significant difference between the two company types in the LSS_En and Sus_Perf relationship when p > 0.05. This research highlights the scarcity of studies exploring the impact of LSS enablers on sustainable performance in Malaysian wastewater treatment plants and emphasizes the role of LPs by focusing on ownership contributions.

References

A. Ishak, E. Mohamad, H. Arep, “The application of six sigma for process control analysis in the Malaysian poultry wastewater treatment,” Journal of Ecological Engineering, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 116–129, 2022.

B. F. Giannetti, F. Sevegnani, R. R. M. Garcia, F. Agostinho, C. M. V. B. Almeida, L. Coscieme, G. Liu, et al., “Enhancing the assessment of cleaner production practices for sustainable development: the five-sector sustainability model applied to water and wastewater treatment companies,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 14, no. 7, p. 4126, 2022.

United Nations, “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future - A/42/427 Annex - UN Documents: Gathering a body of global agreements,” Un-documents.net, 2019. http://www.un-documents.net/wced-ocf.htm

B. Zawadzka, T. Siwiec, M. Marzec, “Effectiveness of dairy and domestic wastewater treatment and technological reliability of the wastewater treatment plant in Michów, Poland,” Journal of Ecological Engineering, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 141–151, 2021.

R. Chavez, W. Yu, M. S. S. Jajja, Y. Song, W. Nakara, “The relationship between internal lean practices and sustainable performance: Exploring the mediating role of social performance,” Production Planning and Control, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 1025–1042, 2020.

A. H. G. Rossi, G. B. Marcondes, J. Pontes, P. Leitão, F. T. Treinta, L. M. M. De Resende, et al., “Lean tools in the context of industry 4.0: Literature review, implementation, and trends,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 19, p. 12295, 2022.

C. Kowang, T. O. Yew, L. K. Hee, O. C. Fei, G. C. Sang, “Lean six sigma implementation: Does success means sustainability?,” International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 907–914, 2019.

M. S. Kaswan, R. Rathi, “Investigating the enablers associated with implementation of green lean six sigma in manufacturing sector using best worst method,” Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 865–876, 2020.

J. A. Singh, M. Rathi, R. Garza-Reyes, “Analysis and prioritization of lean six sigma enablers with environmental facets using best worst method: A case of Indian MSMEs,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 279, p. 123592, 2021.

R. A. Inman, K. W. Green, “Lean and green combine to impact environmental and operational performance,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 56, no. 14, pp. 4802–4818, 2018.

G. Nawanir, K. T. Lim, K. L. Lee, T. D. Moshood, A. N. A. Ahmad, “Less for more: the structural effects of lean manufacturing practices on sustainability of manufacturing SMEs in Malaysia,” International Journal of Supply Chain Management, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 961–975, 2020.

K. Hussain, Z. He, N. Ahmad, M. Iqbal, S. Nazneen, “Mapping green, lean, six sigma enablers through the lens of a construction sector: an emerging economy’s perspective,” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 779–812, 2023.

N. O. Erdil, C. B. Aktas, O. M. Arani, “Embedding sustainability in lean six sigma efforts,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 198, pp. 520–529, 2018.

A. Cherrafi, A. Elfezazi, S. Govindan, K. Garza-Reyes, J.A. Benhida, K. Mokhlis, et al., “A framework for the integration of green and lean six sigma for superior sustainability performance,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 55, no. 15, pp. 4481–4515, 2017.

R. Ben Ruben, S. Vinodh, P. Asokan, “Implementation of lean six sigma framework with environmental considerations in an Indian automotive component manufacturing firm: a case study,” Production Planning and Control, vol. 28, no. 15, pp. 1193–1211, 2017.

D. Carvajal-Arango, S. Bahamón-Jaramillo, P. Aristizábal-Monsalve, A. Vásquez-Hernández, L. F. B. Botero, “Relationships between lean and sustainable construction: Positive impacts of lean practices over sustainability during construction phase,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 234, pp. 1322–1337, 2019.

K. F. Barcia, L. Garcia-Castro, J. Abad-Moran, “Lean six sigma impact analysis on sustainability using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): A literature review,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 5, p. 3051, 2022.

M. Mohaghegh, S. Blasi, A. Größler, “Dynamic capabilities linking lean practices and sustainable business performance,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 322, p. 129073, 2021.

R. Ruiz-Benitez, C. López, J. C. Real, “Achieving sustainability through the lean and resilient management of the supply chain abstract,” International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 122–155, 2019.

M. Sagnak, Y. Kazancoglu, “Integration of green lean approach with six sigma: An application for flue gas emissions,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 127, pp. 112–118, 2016.

A. Farrukh, S. Mathrani, A. Sajjad, “A comparative analysis of green-lean-six sigma enablers and environmental outcomes: a natural resource-based view,” International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 481–502, 2021.

M. S. Kaswan, R. Rathi, “Green lean six sigma for sustainable development: Integration and framework,” Environmental Impact Assessesment Review, vol. 83, p. 106396, 2020.

S. Thanki, J. J. Thakkar, “An investigation on lean–green performance of Indian manufacturing SMEs,” International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 489–517, 2020.

R. Ben Ruben, S. Vinodh, P. Asokan, “ISM and Fuzzy MICMAC application for analysis of lean six sigma barriers with environmental considerations,” International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 64–90, 2018.

A. Ishak, E. Mohamad, A. Hambali, N. L. Johari, “The reliability and process capability assessment of suspended growth sewage treatment plant in Melaka, Malaysia,” Water Science and Technology, vol. 86, no. 9, pp. 2233–2247, 2022.

S. J. Raval, R. Kant, R. Shankar, “Lean six sigma implementation: Modelling the interaction among the enablers,” Production Planning and Control, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 1010–1029, 2018.

M. Godinho Filho, G. M. D. Ganga, A. Gunasekaran, “Lean manufacturing in Brazilian small and medium enterprises: implementation and effect on performance,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 54, no. 24, pp. 7523–7545, 2016.

L. L. L. Negrão, A. B. Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, H. Latan, M. Godinho Filho, C. J. Chiappetta Jabbour, G. M. D. Ganga, “Lean manufacturing and business performance: Testing the S-curve theory,” Production Planning and Control, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 771–785, 2019.

M. V. Sunder, “Synergies of lean six sigma,” IUP Journal of Operations Management, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 21–31, 2013.

W. Timans, K. Ahaus, R. van Solingen, M. Kumar, J. Antony, “Implementation of continuous improvement based on lean six sigma in small- and medium-sized enterprises,” Total Quality Management and Business Excellent, vol. 27, no. 3–4, pp. 309–324, 2016.

J. Antony, V. M. Sunder, C. Laux, E. Cudney. The Ten Commandment of Lean Six Sigma, A Guide for Practitioner, 1st Ed. United Kingdom: Emerald Publishing Limited, 2020.

G. Yadav, T. N. Desai, “Analyzing lean six sigma enablers: A hybrid ISM-fuzzy MICMAC approach,” TQM Journal, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 488–510, 2017.

A. Laureani, J. Antony, “Leadership–a critical success factor for the effective implementation of lean six sigma,” Total Quality Management and Business Excellent, vol. 29, no. 5–6, pp. 502–523, 2018.

A. Shokri, J. Antony, J. A. Garza-Reyes, “A new way of environmentally sustainable manufacturing with assessing transformation through the green deployment of Lean Six Sigma projects,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 351, p. 131510, 2022.

L. T. Letchumanan, H. Gholami, N. M. Yusof, N. H. A. B. Ngadiman, A. A. Salameh, D. Streimikiene, et al., “Analyzing the factors enabling green lean six sigma implementation in the Industry 4.0 era,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 6, p. 3450, 2022.

M. N. Mishra, “Identify critical success factors to implement integrated green and Lean Six Sigma,” International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 765–777, 2022.

R. Rathi, M. S. Kaswan, J. Antony, J. Cross, J. A. Garza-Reyes, S. L. Furterer, “Success factors for the adoption of green lean six sigma in healthcare facility: an ISM-MICMAC study,” International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 864–897, 2023.

V. Gaikwad, L. Sunnapwar, “Development of an integrated framework of LGSS strategies for Indian manufacturing firms to improve business performance: an empirical study,” TQM Journal, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 257–291, 2020.

D. Hariyani, S. Mishra, “Drivers for the adoption of integrated sustainable green lean six sigma agile manufacturing system (ISGLSAMS) and research directions,” Cleaner Engineering and Technology, vol. 7, p. 100449, 2022.

A. Bhattacharya, A. Nand, P. Castka, “Lean-green integration and its impact on sustainability performance: A critical review,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 236, p. 117697, 2019.

E. Psomas, “The underlying factorial structure and significance of the Six Sigma difficulties and critical success factors. The Greek case,” TQM Journal, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 530–546, 2016.

P. T. Shah, R. Ward, “Defining and developing measures of lean production,” Journal of Operations Management, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 785–805, 2007.

M. Iranmanesh, S. Zailani, S. S. Hyun, M. H. Ali, K. Kim, “Impact of lean manufacturing practices on firms’ sustainable performance: Lean culture as a moderator,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 4, p. 1112, 2019.

“Environmental Quality (Amendment) Act 2012 – ACT A1441 – Department of Environment.” Doe.gov.my, 2024, www.doe.gov.my/en/act/environmental-quality-amendment-act-2012-act-a1441. Accessed 28 Sept. 2024.

J. F. Hair Jr, G. T. M. Hult, C. M. Ringle, M. Sarstedt. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), 3rd ed. New York: Sage Publications, 2021.

J. F. Hair, Hult, G. T. M. Ringle, C. M. Sarstedt, M. Danks, N. P. S. Ray. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A Workbook, 1st ed. Switzerland: Springer Nature, 2021.

J. Henseler, C.M. Ringle, M. Sarstedt, “A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling,” Journal of the Academic of Marketing Science, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 115–135, 2015.

J. F. Hair, J. J. Risher, M. Sarstedt, C. M. Ringle, “When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM,” European Business Review, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 2–24, 2019.

K. Schermelleh-Engel, H. Moosbrugger, H. Müller, “Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures,” Methods of Psychological Research Online, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 23–74, 2003.

J. Henseler, M. Sarstedt, “Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling,” Computational Statistics, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 565–580, 2013.

M. Sarstedt, J. F. Hair Jr, J. H. Cheah, J. M. Becker, C. M. Ringle, “How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM,” Australasian Marketing Journal, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 197–211, 2019.

J. Cohen, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.

S. Ogbeibu, C. J. C. Jabbour, J. Gaskin, A. Senadjki, M. Hughes, “Leveraging STARA competencies and green creativity to boost green organisational innovative evidence: A praxis for sustainable development,” Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 2421–2440, 2021.