Effects of catalytic bed position on hydrogen production by methane decomposition

Authors

  • Umair Sikander
  • Suriati Sufian
  • KuZilati KuShaari
  • Fai Kait Chong

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15282/jmes.12.1.2018.3.0297

Keywords:

Hydrogen, Methane Decomposition, Fixed Bed Reactor, Catalyst Bed.

Abstract

COx free hydrogen can be produced by thermal decomposition of methane. Such process is carried out in a fixed bed catalytic reactor. Where heterogeneous catalytic reaction occur when methane come in contact with catalyst bed at a temperature range of 650-900ºC. In this work effect of different catalyst bed positions are investigated on the overall methane conversion to hydrogen. Experimental studies are carried out to in a Fixed Bed Reactor at 700oC, by placing a catalyst bed of same porosity µ=0.2 at 25%, 50%, 75% column height, and at top of reactor. It is found that same catalyst has shown different results when placed at different heights in reactor column. Highest methane conversion of 85% is found when catalyst bed is placed at 25% column height from bottom. It is found that for endothermic
reactions like methane decomposition catalyst bed position has its significance due to its effects on process thermal conditions and on bed expansion by carbon deposition.

References

HF Abbas and WMA. Wan Daud. Hydrogen production by methane decomposition: a review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.2010; 35(3):1160-1190.

Špela Hajduk, Venkata D.B.C. Dasireddy,BlažLikozar, GoranDražić and Zorica Crnjak Orel. COx-free hydrogen production via decomposition of ammonia over Cu–Zn-based heterogeneous catalysts and their activity/stability. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2017; 211:57-67.

M Pudukudy,Z Yaakob, N Dahani,M S Takriff and N S Mat Hassan. Production of COx free hydrogen and nanocarbon via methane decomposition over unsupported porous nickel and iron catalysts. Journal of Cluster Science, 2017; 28(3):1579-1594.

Bayat N, M Rezaei, and F Meshkani. Methane dissociation to CO x-free hydrogen and carbon nanofiber over Ni-Cu/Al 2 O 3 catalysts. Fuel. 2017; 195: 88-96.

MM Noor, AP Wandel and T Yusaf. Air fuel ratio study for mixture of biogas and hydrogen on mild combustion. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering.2014;10:2144-2154.

Z He, J Fu, B Cheng, J Yu, and S Cao., Cu 2 (OH) 2 CO 3 clusters: Novel noble-metal-free cocatalysts for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen production from water splitting. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental.2017;205:104-111.

A Carrero, JA. Calles, L García-Moreno and AJ. Vizcaíno, Production of Renewable Hydrogen from Glycerol Steam Reforming over Bimetallic Ni-(Cu, Co, Cr) Catalysts Supported on SBA-15 Silica. Catalysts. 2017;7(2):55.

R Kothari, V Kumar, VV Pathak, S Ahmad, O Aoyi and V.V.Tyagi. A critical review on factors influencing fermentative hydrogen production. Frontiers in bioscience (Landmark edition).2017; 22:1195.

Muda, N. and M. Boosroh, Gasification of coal-petcoke blends in a pilot scale gasification plant. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering.2013;8:1457.

K I Hamada, MM Rahman, D Ramasamy, MM Noor and K Kadirgama. Numerical investigation of in-cylinder flow characteristics of hydrogen-fuelled internal combustion engine. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences.2016;10(1):1782-1802.

M Mahmoudi, J Dentzer, R Gadiou and A Ouederni. Evaluation of activated carbons based on olive stones as catalysts during hydrogen production by thermocatalytic decomposition of methane. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2017;42(13):8712-8720.

Astrid Wolfbeisser, Gábor Kovács, Sergey M.Kozlov, Karin Föttinger, Johannes Bernardi, Bernhard Klötzer, Konstantin M.Neyman and Günther Rupprechter., Surface composition changes of CuNi-ZrO 2 during methane decomposition: An operando NAP-XPS and density functional study. Catalysis Today. 2017;283:134-143.

Mondal KC and S.R. Chandran, Evaluation of the economic impact of hydrogen production by methane decomposition with steam reforming of methane process. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.2014;39(18): 9670-9674.

A E Awadallah, MS Mostafa, A A Aboul-Enein and S A Hanafi. Hydrogen production via methane decomposition over Al 2 O 3–TiO 2 binary oxides supported Ni catalysts: Effect of Ti content on the catalytic efficiency. Fuel. 2014;129:68-77.

S Fukuda, N Nakamura, J Monden and M Nishikawa. Experimental study of cracking methane by Ni/SiO2 catalyst. Journal of nuclear materials. 2004; 329:1365-1369.

GA Mauricio, RS Ruiza, FL Isunza, and C O Araiza, A simple approach to describe hydrodynamics and its effect on heat and mass transport in an industrial wall-cooled fixed bed catalytic reactor: ODH of ethane on a MoVNbTeO formulation. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2017;321:584-599.

Nahavandi, M., Selective catalytic reduction(SCR) of NO by ammonia over V2O5/tio2 catalyst in a catalytic filter medium and honeycomb reactor: A kinetic modeling study. Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2015; 32(4):875-893.

L Kai;L JingLin;L XiaoSong;Z XiaoBing and Z AiMin.Warm plasma catalytic reforming of biogas in a heat-insulated reactor: Dramatic energy efficiency and catalyst auto-reduction. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2016; 288:671-679.

Huff Jr, G.A. and C.N. Satterfield, Liquid accumulation in catalyst pores in a Fischer-Tropsch fixed-bed reactor. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development.1985;24(4):986-995.

V Blasco,C Royo,A Monzón and J Santamaría, Catalyst sintering in fixed‐bed reactors: Deactivation rate and thermal history. AIChE journal.1992; 38(2):237-243.

R. Burch, E M Crabb, G D Squire and S C Tsang, The importance of heterogeneous and homogeneous reactions in oxidative coupling of methane over chloride promoted oxide catalysts. Catalysis letters. 1989;2(4):249-256.

Muradov N. Hydrogen via methane decomposition: an application for decarbonization of fossil fuels. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2001; 26(11):1165-1175.

A S A Al–Fatish, A A Ibrahim, A H Fakeeha, M A Soliman, M R H Siddiqui and A E Abasaeed Coke formation during CO 2 reforming of CH 4 over alumina-supported nickel catalysts. Applied Catalysis A: General. 2009; 364(1):150-155.

Nijemeisland, M. and A.G. Dixon, Comparison of CFD simulations to experiment for convective heat transfer in a gas–solid fixed bed. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2001;82(1)231-246.

Bayat N, M. Rezaei, and F. Meshkani, Methane decomposition over Ni–Fe/Al 2 O 3 catalysts for production of CO x-free hydrogen and carbon nanofiber. International journal of hydrogen energy.2016;41(3):1574-1584.

Pudukudy M, Z Yaakob and M S Takriff, Methane decomposition over Pd promoted Ni/MgAl 2 O 4 catalysts for the production of COx free hydrogen and multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Applied Surface Science. 2015;356:1320-1326.

Kolios G, J Frauhammer, and G Eigenberger. Autothermal fixed-bed reactor concepts. Chemical Engineering Science. 2000; 55(24):5945-5967.

Dixon AG., M Nijemeisland, and E H. Stitt. Packed tubular reactor modeling and catalyst design using computational fluid dynamics. Advances in Chemical Engineering. 2006;31:307-389.

Van Driesen, R.P., et al.. Control of bed expansion in expanded bed reactor. 1987, Google Patents.

S H Sharif Zein, A R Mohamed, and P S T Sai, Kinetic studies on catalytic decomposition of methane to hydrogen and carbon over Ni/TiO2 catalyst. Industrial & engineering chemistry research. 2004;43(16):4864-4870.

J Natarajan, T Lieuwen, and J Seitzman. Laminar flame speeds of H2/CO mixtures: effect of CO 2 dilution, preheat temperature, and pressure. Combustion and Flame. 2007;151(1):104-119.

J.Natarajan, Y Kochar, T.Lieuwen, and J.Seitzman. Pressure and preheat dependence of laminar flame speeds of H 2/CO/CO 2/O 2/He mixtures. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2009;32(1):1261-1268.

Stilger, J.D., R.J. Martin, and M.R. Holst, Method and apparatus for recuperative heating of reactants in an reaction matrix. 1994, Google Patents.

G Di Marcoberardino, F Sosio, G Manzolini and S Campanari., Fixed bed membrane reactor for hydrogen production from steam methane reforming: experimental and modeling approach. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2015;40(24):7559-7567.

S Abbas,V Dupont and T Mahmud, Modelling of H2 production in a packed bed reactor via sorption enhanced steam methane reforming process. International journal of hydrogen energy. 2017;42(30):18910-18921.

Y N Wang, YY Xu, Y W Li, Y L Zhao and B J Zhang. Heterogeneous modeling for fixed-bed Fischer–Tropsch synthesis: reactor model and its applications. Chemical Engineering Science. 2003; 58(3):867-875.

Published

2022-12-09

How to Cite

[1]
U. Sikander, S. Sufian, K. KuShaari, and F. K. Chong, “Effects of catalytic bed position on hydrogen production by methane decomposition”, J. Mech. Eng. Sci., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 3313–3320, Dec. 2022.