Constructing Unity and Prosperity in Diplomatic Economic Discourse: Insights from Positive Discourse Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15282/ijleal.v16i2.12703Keywords:
Diplomatic economic discourse, Investment forum, Political speech, Positive discourse analysis, Saudi ArabiaAbstract
This study applies positive discourse analysis (PDA) to the rhetoric of U.S. President Donald Trump delivered during a 2025 speech at the Saudi-U.S. Investment Forum in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. It attempts to provide answers to the following central questions: How are certain words and phrases utilised to tell stories of hope, unity, and shared values in a political-economic context where politics and economics are typically precarious matters? In what ways does President Trump use language to create an empowering message in his speech? What positive visions of cooperation and respect are expressed? In what ways do these language strategies help the U.S. achieve its goals in the Middle East? While critical discourse analysis focuses on power struggles and tension, PDA is concerned with how language is used to unite people, foster hope, and promote cooperation. This research utilises qualitative methods to analyse President Trump’s 2025 address and focuses on inclusive pronouns, metaphors, and respectful language as salient discursive tactics. These rhetorical devices help create a diplomatic message grounded in shared values and goals, suggesting that the speaker wants to strengthen alliances and encourage cross-cultural understanding. The research finds that even controversial leaders in public discourse can, on occasion, use constructive language aligned with the audience and context. The research also suggests that political rhetoric can help build confidence and solidarity, as well as validate the fundamental ideals of PDA. While the study is limited to one speech, the analysis can be extrapolated to international diplomacy in general and thus provide input to the emerging PDA discipline. It also calls for additional research on the power of positive and cooperative language in world politics, especially in alliance formation and conflict resolution.
References
Alenizi, A., & AbuSa’aleek, O. (2022). Political discourse analysis: Analysing building tasks in Trump’s speech in Saudi Arabia. Arab World English Journal, 13(2), 462–472. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no2.32
Aysar, Y. T., & Lucy, P. A. (2019). Technologisation of discourse: Technologisation of American foreign policy discourse in the Middle East in President Donald Trump’s selected speeches. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(4), 265–274. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n4p265
Bergmann, E. (2024). Three-step rhetorical model of conspiratorial populism. In S. Newman & M. Conrad (Eds.), Post-truth populism (pp. 217–245). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-64178-7_8
Blaydes, L., Hamzawy, A., & Sallam, H. (2022). Struggles for political change in the Arab world. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.12237894
Brittain-Hale, A. (2023, February 10). Public diplomacy and foreign policy analysis in the 21st century: Navigating uncertainty through digital power and influence [Conference presentation]. 21st Annual Graduate Research Conference, Old Dominion University. https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1033&context=gsis_studentconference
Darnton, C. (2019). Public diplomacy and international conflict resolution: A cautionary case from Cold War South America. Foreign Policy Analysis, 16(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/orz003
Deroncele-Acosta, A., & Ellis, A. (2024). Overcoming challenges and promoting positive education in inclusive schools: A multi-country study. Education Sciences, 14(11), 1169. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14111169
Discourse Analyzer. (2024, October 26). Political speeches in discourse analysis. Discourse Analyzer AI Toolkit. https://discourseanalyzer.com/political-speeches-in-discourse-analysis/
Dunmire, P. L. (2012). Political discourse analysis: Exploring the language and politics of language. Language & Linguistics Compass, 6(11), 735–751. https://doi.org/10.1002/lnc3.365
Ehibor, O. J., Eyisi, J., Jr., Odukoya, J. A., Ogbulogo, C. U., Ugorji, C. U. C., Odo, O., Chimuanya, L., Abiodun-Eniayekan, E., Awogu-Maduagwu, E., & Adesiyan, R. U. (2025). Linguistic-stylistic analysis of the language of leadership in the political arena and the business world. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 12(1), 2464382. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2025.2464382
Fairclough, N. (1995). Media discourse. Edward Arnold.
Gu, C. (2023). ‘Climate change concerns human survival … and justice in our international community’: A corpus-based positive discourse analysis (PDA) of the largest developing nation’s global involvement/engagement discourses (re)told in interpreting. PLoS One, 18(4), e0277705. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277705
Mallet, A., & Mahboob, A. (2023). ‘Positive discourse analysis’. In Oxford Bibliographies. https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/display/document/obo-9780199772810/obo-9780199772810-0306.xml?q=Positive+discourse+analysis+#firstMatch
Martin, J. R. (2004). Positive discourse analysis: Solidarity and change. 49, 179–200. https://riull.ull.es/xmlui/bitstream/handle/915/29390/RECEI%2049_(2004)_11.pdf?sequence=1
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan.
Marttila, T. (2025). Post-foundational discourse analysis: A suggestion for a research program. Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 16(3), 1. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-16.3.2282
Muñoz, P., Bellogín, A., Barba-Rojas, R., & Díez, F. (2024). Quantifying polarisation in online political discourse. EPJ Data Science, 13(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-024-00480-3
Neale, T. H., & Ely, D. (2007). Speechwriting in perspective: A brief guide to effective and persuasive communication. Congressional Research Service. https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/98-170.pdf
Oo, Z., & Dai, Y. (2025). News media effects on policy priorities: A second-level agenda-setting analysis of Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) projects in Myanmar. Journalism & Media, 6(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6010015
Roberts, K., Dowell, A., & Nie, J. B. (2019). Attempting rigour and replicability in thematic analysis of qualitative research data: A case study of codebook development. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0707-y
Sheerin, J. (2025, March 5). Six takeaways from Trump’s big speech. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c981wj6n9l2o
Taubaldiyev, M., Kulmanov, S., Amirbekova, A., Azimkhan, Y., Zhonkeshov, B., Utemissova, G., & Ospanov, Y. (2024). Terminology in political discourse as a means of language representation of the image of the country. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 186–198. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.10117
The White House. (2025, May 13). In Riyadh, President Trump charts the course for a prosperous future in the Middle East. https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/2025/05/in-riyadh-president-trump-charts-the-course-for-a-prosperous-future-in-the-middle-east/
van Dijk, T. A. (Ed.). (1997). Discourse as social interaction. Sage.
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2001). Methods of critical discourse analysis. Sage.
Xin, J., & Matheson, D. (2018). One Belt, competing metaphors: The struggle over strategic narrative in English-language news media. International Journal of Communication, 12, 4248–4268. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/8580/2482
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

