Ergonomics Study of Rostrum Design

Authors

  • R. Jaafar Centre for Mechanical Engineering Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA cawangan Pulau Pinang, 13500 Pulau Pinang, Malaysia.
  • M. A. Hafiz Mohamad Centre for Mechanical Engineering Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA cawangan Pulau Pinang, 13500 Pulau Pinang, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15282/jmmst.v7i1.8788

Keywords:

Rostrum, Ergonomic, Design, Anthopometry, Speaker

Abstract

Ergonomics design has been demanded and considered the main effective factor in preventing ergonomics hazards for the user for the last several decades. The design of a product should be based on human factors and anthropometry to ensure a good fit between the product and people. It is also to increase comfort and safety. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the element of ergonomics in the rostrum design used in the school in Kulim Kedah, Malaysia. There are four (4) ergonomic dimension criteria that were used to check the fifteen (15) samples of the rostrum. The rostrum dimensions are compared to the ergonomic dimensions range of the workbench for standing operation from the previous study and established guidelines. The results are described in frequencies and percentages. The result shows that 80% of the rostrum meets the ergonomics design criteria. To achieve a 100% ergonomic rostrum, the product designers must be knowledgeable about ergonomic design and aware of its significance for the user.

References

M. Steel. New Oxford English-English-Malay Dictionary. “Rostrum”. Fajar Bakti Malaysia. 2003.

Cambridge Dictionary. “Rostrum”. Retrieved; https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/rostrum. 8 August 2022.

M. R. Mohamad Rosman, N. S. Baharuddin, M. A. Abdul Aziz, and K. Abdul Rahman. “Investigating the factors affecting user satisfaction in the context of rostrum selection”. Journal of Advanced Research in Social and Behavioural Sciences, vol. 21, issue 1, pp.19-28, 2020. https://doi.org/10.37934/arsbs.21.1.1928.

M. N. Mohd Noh, H. Krishnan, R. Abd Aziz, R. Md Zein, and N. A. Azis. “Research and design of ergonomics rostrum”. 3rd Scientific Conference on Occupational Safety and Health, June 2015, vol 12, no. 1, pp. 183-186, 2015.

B. Suarnur, M. F. Che Leh, and M. Z. Ali. “Eco-Rostrum. Sustainable Tropical Environmental Design Exhibition 2011”, ISSN: 2180-0685, vol : 3, pp.182-183, 2011.

I. Dianat, J. Molenbroek, and H.I. Castellucci. “A review of the methodology and applications of anthropometry in ergonomics and product design”. Ergonomics, vol. 61, no. 12, pp.1696-1720, 2018. DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1502817.

M. N. Ikhwan Shafiee. “Anthropometric consideration in design”. NIOSH Malaysia Newsletter April 2020, pp.4-5, 2020.

I. W. Taifa, D. A. Desai, and N.M. Bulsara. “The development of an ergonomically designed product through an integrated product team approach”. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, vol. 27, no 1, pp. 160-178, 2021. DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2018.1557398.

National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health Malaysia (NIOSH). “Why product design should be based on human factors?”. Retrieved: https://www.anthropometric.niosh.com.my/faqs. 20 August 2022.

S. Pheasant, and C. M. Haslegrave. “Bodyspace: Anthropometry, ergonomics, and the design of work. health”. San Francisco (2nd ed). London: Taylor and Francis. 2006.

R. Baker, P. Coenen, E. Howie, J. Lee, A. Williamson, and L. Straker. ”Musculoskeletal and cognitive effects of a movement intervention during prolonged standing for office work”. Human factors, vol. 60, no 7, pp. 947-961. 2018. DOI: 10.1177/0018720818783945.

A. N. Alias, K. Karuppiah, V. How, and V. Perumal. Does prolonged standing at work among teachers associated with Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSDs)? Mal J Med Health Sci. vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 281-289, 2020.

Item. “Ergonomic Work bench systems for industrial & commercial use”. Retrieved: https://www.assemblymag.com/ext/resources/White_Papers/Sep16/Work_Bench_System_Whitepaper_EN.pdf 15 August 2022.

M. E. Joy. “Improved ergonomics for standing work”. Retrieved: https://ohsonline.com/Articles/2003/04/Improved-Ergonomics-for-Standing-Work.aspx?Page=1. 15 August 2022.

Ergonomic System Associates (ESA). “Guidelines for the design of standing workstation”. https://ergosystems.ca/dow Ergonomic Systems Associates Inc. Canada.2009.

M. Rys, and S. Konz. “Standing”. Ergonomics, vol. 37, no 46, pp. 677-687, 1994.

Canadian Centre for Occupational Health & Safety (CCOHS). “Working in a standing position - basic information”. Retrieved: https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/ergonomics/standing/standing_basic.html. 5 August 2022.

A. S. M. Hoque, M. S. Parveza, P. K. Haldera, and T. Szecsib. “Ergonomic design of classroom furniture for university students of Bangladesh”. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, pp.1-14. 2014. DOI: 10.1080/21681015.2014.940069.

Downloads

Published

30-03-2023

How to Cite

Jaafar, R., & Hafiz Mohamad, M. A. . (2023). Ergonomics Study of Rostrum Design. Journal of Modern Manufacturing Systems and Technology, 7(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.15282/jmmst.v7i1.8788

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.