Ergonomic Embedded in Designing Welding Assembly Tool for Automotive Manufacturing Process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15282/jmmst.v7i2.9923Keywords:
Ergonomics, Welding assembly tools, CATIAAbstract
Ergonomics focuses on understanding how workers interact with their work environment, tools, and equipment. The proper ergonomics consideration in tool design will impact worker safety and productivity. Ergonomics-embedded knowledge is critical in designing welding assembly tools for automotive manufacturing. The study aims to improve the ergonomic issues faced by the automotive assembly welders. The methodology involves studying the existing welding assembly process in automotive manufacturing regarding RULA scores and simulating the postures using CATIA analysis. Based on the simulation, critical ergonomics issues should be identified and analyzed. Finally, the welding process is improved by designing the hand support for the workers to assemble parts. The results revealed that the RULA scores have improved from 7 (high risk at the existing condition) to 3 (medium risk) for both worker's hands after the support of the assembly tool. In conclusion, ergonomic embedding in welding assembly tool design has improved the automotive assembly worker's well-being. The findings of this study contribute to the growing body of knowledge on integrating ergonomics into automotive manufacturing processes, providing valuable insights for industry practitioners and researchers alike.
References
Mahendra K C, Virupaksha Gouda H, DR. A Thimmana Gouda (2016). Ergonomic Analysis of Welding Operator Postures. International Journal of Mechanical and Production Engineering, ISSN: 2320-2092.
Das Suman, Banerjee Debamalya, Mukherjee Shankarashis (2018). A Report Based on Analysis of Posture and Occupational Health of Welders in Different Welding Units. Universal Journal of Public Health 6(3): 127-134, 2018 doi: 10.13189/ujph.2018.060301.
P. L. Jensen, “Human factors and ergonomics in the planning of production,” Int. J. Ind. Ergon., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 121–131, Mar. 2002; doi: 10.1016/S0169-8141(01)00056-7.
B. D. Lowe, P. G. Dempsey, and E. M. Jones, “Ergonomics assessment methods used by ergonomics professionals,” Appl. Ergon., vol. 81, p. 102882, Nov. 2019; doi: 10.1016/J.APERGO.2019.102882.
Malikraj.S, Senthil Kumar.T, Ganguly.A.K (2011). Ergonomic Intervention on Musculoskeletal Problems Among Welders. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology.
Aynur Gürsoy Özcan (2021). Ergonomic Risk Assessment in Automotive Welding Lines and Comparison of Method Output. DUJE (Dicle University Journal of Engineering) 12:4 (2021) Page 645-659.
R. L. Charles and J. Nixon, “Measuring mental workload using physiological measures: A systematic review,” Appl. Ergon., vol. 74, pp. 221–232, Jan. 2019; doi: 10.1016/J.APERGO.2018.08.028.
M. Fallaha, Z. M. Cinar, O. Korhan, and Q. Zeeshan, “Operator 4.0 and Cognitive Ergonomics,” in Global Joint Conference on Industrial Engineering and Its Application Areas, 2019, pp. 217–228.
Maw Maw Htay, Guo Shunsheng, Asa Romeo Asa (2013). Quality Information Flow of Welding Process in Auto Manufacturing, International Journal Of Scientific & Technology Research Volume 2, Issue 4, April 2013.
Aziz, F.A., Ghazalli, Z., Mohamed, N.M.Z., Isfar, A. (2017). Investigation on musculoskeletal discomfort and ergonomics risk factors among production team members at an automotive component assembly plant. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 257(1).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Universiti Malaysia Pahang Publishing
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
