Implementation of Tofu Pouring Tool to Reduce Physical Workload and Ergonomic Risks

Authors

  • Lamto Widodo Universitas Tarumanagara
  • Carla Olyvia Doally Tarumanagara University
  • Berta Lawrensa Work System Design and Ergonomic Laboratory, Tarumanagara University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15282/yhqtrs55

Keywords:

ergonomic, risk, tofu, REBA, pouring tool

Abstract

Industrial workers have an important role in influencing productivity and work efficiency. The problem of decreasing worker productivity due to workload and body posture occurs at UD Harapan Jaya Indah, in the production of fried tofu, where there are 3 work stations, namely pouring, cutting, and frying. In this study, body posture analysis was carried out using the Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) method. Workload was measured by analyzing the Cardiovascular Load, and simultaneously conducted interviews to fill out the Nordic Body Map questionnaire, to find out workers' perceptions of the perceived workload. The results of this study are the design of the Tofu Dough Pouring Tool, which is the station that has the greatest workload. Of the 3 design concepts, concept 2 was selected as the best concept. Finally, the prototyping and implementation was carried out. Previously, workers' complaints on their backs were rated 7 (very painful) reduced to 1 (painful) after implementation. The REBA score before implementation had a moderate risk level (score 5-7), and after implementation was at a small risk level (score 3). The percentage of Cardiovascular Load in the pouring before implementation decreased from 31.55% to 28.7%.

References

[1] S. H. Shieh, F. C. Sung, C. H. Su, Y. Tsai, and V. C. R. Hsieh, “Increased low back pain risk in nurses with high workload for patient care: A questionnaire survey,” Taiwan. J. Obstet. Gynecol., vol. 55, no. 4, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2016.06.013.

[2] S. Y. Yoon, J. Ko, and M. C. Jung, “A model for developing job rotation schedules that eliminate sequential high workloads and minimize between-worker variability in cumulative daily workloads: Application to automotive assembly lines,” Appl. Ergon., vol. 55, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.01.011.

[3] L. Zheng, J. M. Regenstein, F. Teng, and Y. Li, “Tofu products: A review of their raw materials, processing conditions, and packaging,” Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, vol. 19, no. 6. 2020. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12640.

[4] J. Park, Y. Kim, and B. Han, “Work Sectors with High Risk for Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders in Korean Men and Women,” Saf. Health Work, vol. 9, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2017.06.005.

[5] D. Das, A. Kumar, and M. Sharma, “A systematic review of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among handicraft workers,” Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon., vol. 26, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1080/10803548.2018.1458487.

[6] M. Zare, N. Black, J. C. Sagot, G. Hunault, and Y. Roquelaure, “Ergonomics interventions to reduce musculoskeletal risk factors in a truck manufacturing plant,” Int. J. Ind. Ergon., vol. 75, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2019.102896.

[7] I. Z. Sutalaksana, R. Anggawisastra, and J. H. Tjakraatmadja, Teknik Perancangan Sistem Kerja, 2nd ed. Bandung: ITB Press, 2006.

[8] R. S. Bridger, Introduction to Ergonomic, 3rd ed. Boca Raton, [Florida] London, [England] New York: CRC Press, 2009. [Online]. Available: https://trove.nla.gov.au/version/45368308

[9] L. Widodo, I. W. Sukania, and K. Yota, “RANCANGAN FASILITAS KERJA PADA PROSES PERAKITAN CONTROLLER DI PT MULTITANAKA SURYATAMA BERDASARKAN PRINSIP ERGONOMI,” J. Ilm. Tek. Ind., 2019, doi: 10.24912/jitiuntar.v6i2.4238.

[10] L. Widodo, S. Ariyanti, and J. Octavia, “Peningkatan produktifitas UKM Produk Sugarwax melalui Intervensi Ergonomi,” 2019. doi: http://jurnalergonomik3.ti.itb.ac.id/index.php/ergonomik3/article/view/112.

[11] S. Hignett and L. McAtamney, “Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA),” Appl. Ergon., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 201–205, Apr. 2000, doi: 10.1016/S0003-6870(99)00039-3.

[12] L. Widodo, A. Adianto, D. Debby, and S. Rohananasution, “Ergonomic portable toilet for women in public facilities,” in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, May 2019, vol. 508, no. 1. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/508/1/012052.

[13] M. M. Cremasco, A. Giustetto, F. Caffaro, A. Colantoni, E. Cavallo, and S. Grigolato, “Risk assessment for musculoskeletal disorders in forestry: A comparison between RULA and REBA in the manual feeding of a wood-chipper,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 16, no. 5, 2019, doi: 10.3390/ijerph16050793.

[14] K. Enez and S. S. Nalbantoğlu, “Comparison of ergonomic risk assessment outputs from OWAS and REBA in forestry timber harvesting,” Int. J. Ind. Ergon., vol. 70, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2019.01.009.

[15] M. D. Jakobsen, E. Sundstrup, R. Persson, C. H. Andersen, and L. L. Andersen, “Is Borg’s perceived exertion scale a useful indicator of muscular and cardiovascular load in blue-collar workers with lifting tasks? A cross-sectional workplace study,” Eur. J. Appl. Physiol., 2014, doi: 10.1007/s00421-013-2782-9.

[16] i gede Suarbawa, N. Adiputra, i dewa Sutjana, and K. Tirtayasa, “TINGKAT BEBAN KERJA PERAJIN GAMELAN BALI,” J. Ergon. Indones., 2016.

Downloads

Published

30-03-2024

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Implementation of Tofu Pouring Tool to Reduce Physical Workload and Ergonomic Risks. (2024). Journal of Modern Manufacturing Systems and Technology, 8(1), 18-25. https://doi.org/10.15282/yhqtrs55

Similar Articles

1-10 of 31

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.