Various methods of simulating wave kinematics on the structural members of 100-year responses

Authors

  • M.K. Abu Husain Razak School of UTM in Engineering and Advanced Technology, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 54100 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • N.I. Mohd Zaki Razak School of UTM in Engineering and Advanced Technology, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 54100 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • G. Najafian School of Engineering, The University of Liverpool, Brownlow Hill, L69 3GH, Liverpool, United Kingdom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15282/jmes.11.4.2017.27.0293

Keywords:

wave kinematics; stretching method; effective method; current loading

Abstract

The main force acting on an offshore structure is usually due to wind-generated random waves. According to the Morison equation, the wave force on a cylindrical member of an offshore structure depends on wave kinematics at the centre of the element. It is therefore essential to accurately estimate the magnitude of wave-induced water particle kinematics at all points in a random wave field. Linear random wave theory (LRWT) is the mostfrequently used theory to simulate water particle kinematics at different nodes of an offshore structure. Several empirical techniques have been suggested to provide a more realistic representation of the near-surface wave kinematics. The empirical techniques popular in the offshore industry include Wheeler stretching and vertical stretching. Most recently, two new effective methods (effective node elevation and the effective water depth) have been recently introduced. The problem is that these modified methods differ from one another in their predictions. Hence, the aim of this study is to investigate the effects of predicting the 100-year responses from various methods of simulating wave kinematics accounting for the current effect. In this paper, four versions of the wave kinematics procedure have been tested by comparing the short-term probability distributions of extreme responses. For all current cases, the highest vertical ratios for zero, positive and negative current cases are 1.414, 1.175 and 1.831, respectively. It is observed that even for positive-current cases, the difference between Wheeler and vertical stretching predictions is quite high and cannot be neglected. Thus, further investigation is necessary to resolve this problem and the outcomes in providing useful design information for the oil and gas industry.

References

Najafian G. Local hydrodynamic force coefficients from field data and probabilistic analysis of offshore structures exposed to random wave loading: University of Liverpool, Liverpool; 1991.

Mellor G. A combined derivation of the integrated and vertically resolved, coupled wave–current equations. Journal of Physical Oceanography. 2015;45:1453-63.

Kim DK, Zalaya MA, Mohd MH, Choi HS, Park KS. Safety assessment of corroded jacket platform considering decommissioning event. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering. 2017;14:4462-85.

Fitriadhy A, Aswad MK, Aldin NA, Mansor NA, Bakar AA, Wan Nik WB. Computational fluid dynamics analysis on the course stability of a towed ship. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences. 2016;11:2919-29.

Morison J, Johnson J, Schaaf S. The force exerted by surface waves on piles. Journal of Petroleum Technology. 1950;2:149-54.

Smit P, Janssen T, Herbers T. Nonlinear Wave Kinematics near the Ocean Surface. Journal of Physical Oceanography. 2017;47:1657-73.

Haver SK, Edvardsen K, Lian G. Uncertainties in wave loads on slender pile structures due to uncertainties in modelling waves and associated kinematics. The 27th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference: International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers; 2017.

Abu Husain MK, Mohd Zaki NI, Najafian G. Derivation of the probability distribution of the extreme values of offshore structural response by an efficient time simulation method. The Open Civil Engineering Journal. 2013;7:61-272.

Chalikov D, Babanin AV, Sanina E. Numerical modeling of 3D fully nonlinear potential periodic waves. Ocean dynamics. 2014;64:1469-86.

Melville WK, Fedorov AV. The equilibrium dynamics and statistics of gravity–capillary waves. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 2015;767:449-66.

Wheeler J. Methods for calculating forces produced by irregular waves. Offshore Technology Conference: Offshore Technology Conference; 1969.

Marshall P, Inglis R. Wave kinematics and force coefficients. ASCE structures congress1986. p. 15-8.

Rodenbusch G, Forristall G. An empirical model for random directional wave kinematics near the free surface. Offshore Technology Conference: Offshore Technology Conference; 1986.

Couch A, Conte J. Field verification of linear and nonlinear hybrid wave models for offshore tower response prediction. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. 1997;119:158-65.

Zhang J, Chen L, Ye M, Randall RE. Hybrid wave model for unidirectional irregular waves—part I. Theory and numerical scheme. Applied Ocean Research. 1996;18:77-92.

Rascle N, Chapron B, Ponte A, Ardhuin F, Klein P. Surface roughness imaging of currents shows divergence and strain in the wind direction. Journal of Physical Oceanography. 2014;44:2153-63.

Spell C, Zhang J, Randall RE. Hybrid wave model for unidirectional irregular waves—part II. Comparison with laboratory measurements. Applied Ocean Research. 1996;18:93-110.

Longridge J, Randall R, Zhang J. Comparison of experimental irregular water wave elevation and kinematic data with new hybrid wave model predictions. Ocean Engineering. 1996;23:277-307.

Najafian G, Zaki NM, Aqel G. Simulation of water particle kinematics in the near surface zone. ASME 28th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering: American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2009. p. 157-62.

Zaki NM, Najafian G. Derivation of water particle kinematics in the near surface zone by the effective water depth procedure. ASME 2010 29th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering: American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2010. p. 295-300.

Mohd Zaki NI, Abu Husain MK, Najafian G. Comparison of the extreme responses from different methods of simulating wave kinematics. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computational Methods in Marine Engineering, Rome, Italy. 2015:365-76.

Pizzo N, Deike L, Melville WK. Current generation by deep-water breaking waves. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 2016;803:275-91.

Pizzo N, Melville WK. Wave modulation: the geometry, kinematics, and dynamics of surface-wave packets. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 2016;803:292-312.

Sarpkaya T, Isaacson M. Mechanics of wave forces on offshore structures. 1981.

Fujimoto W, Waseda T. Nonlinear Effects on Local Mechanics of Freak Waves. ASME 34th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering: American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2015. p. V007T06A83-VT06A83.

Mirzadeh J, Kimiaei M, Cassidy MJ. Performance of an example jack-up platform under directional random ocean waves. Applied Ocean Research. 2016;54:87-100.

(API) API. Recommended practice for planning, designing and constructing fixed offshore platforms — Working stress design (22nd Edition). 2014.

Kajishima T, Takeuchi S. Simulation of fluid-structure interaction based on an immersed-solid method. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences. 2013;5:555-61.

Pierson WJ, Moskowitz L. A proposed spectral form for fully developed wind seas based on the similarity theory of SA Kitaigorodskii. Journal of geophysical research. 1964;69:5181-90.

Mohd Zaki N, Abu Husain M, Najafian G. Extreme structural response values from various methods of simulating wave kinematics. Ships and Offshore Structures. 2016;11:369-84.

Deo M. Waves and Structures. Mumbai: Indian Institute of Technology Bombay. 2013.

Mukhlas NA, Shuhaimy NA, Johari MB, Soom EM, Khairi M, Husain A, et al. Design and analysis of fixed offshore structure–an overview. Malaysian Journal of Civil Engineering. 28(3): 503–520

Zaki NM, Husain MA, Wang Y, Najafian G. Short-Term Distribution of the Extreme Values of Offshore Structural Response by Modified Finite-Memory Nonlinear System Modeling. ASME 32nd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering: American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2013. p. V02ATA049-V02AT02A.

Wang Y, Mallahzadeh H, Husain MA, Zaki NM, Najafian G. Probabilistic modelling of extreme offshore structural response due to random wave loading. ASME 32nd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering: American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2013. p. V02BTA007-V02BT02A.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-31

How to Cite

[1]
M. Abu Husain, N. Mohd Zaki, and G. Najafian, “Various methods of simulating wave kinematics on the structural members of 100-year responses”, J. Mech. Eng. Sci., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 3256–3273, Dec. 2017.