The Utilization of Live Streaming Technology to Improve the Shopping Experience that Generates Engagement and Buyer Trustworthiness in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15282/jmmst.v5i2.6859Keywords:
Live Streaming, Shopping value, Digital TechnologyAbstract
The development of technology and the internet caused intense competition in the retail industry. This encourages retail industry players to innovate. The live streaming feature addresses the problem of lost aspect from the offline shopping experience as result of online shopping. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of shopping value on customer engagement through trust in product and sellers. In this study, the data were analysed with descriptive and SEM-PLS analysis methods. Respondents who fulfilled the requirements in this study were 109 respondents. Based on the data analysis, the three shopping values (utilitarian value, hedonic value, and symbolic value) have a positive influence on customer engagement without going through the variable of trust. Among the three shopping values, symbolic values is proven to have the greatest influence on customer engagement.
References
Soliha, E. (2008). Analisis Industri Ritel di Indonesia. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Ekonomi (JBE), 15(2), 128–143.
Dor, O. (2019) A Look at China's Multi-Billion Dollar Live Streaming Industry.
Sun, Y., Shao, X., Li, X., Guo, Y., & Nie, K. (2019). How Live S streaming Influences Purchase Intentions in Social Commerce: An IT Affordance Perspective. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 37, 100886.
Statista. (2019). Market Size of Online Live Streaming in China from 2016 to 2020.
Herrera, C. (2017). Why a Live Video Strategy is a Must-Have for Marketers.
Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994). Utilitarian Shopping Value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), 644–657.
Wongkitrungrueng, A., & Assarut, N. (2018). The Role of Live Streaming in Building Consumer Trust and Engagement with Social Commerce Sellers. Journal of Business Research
Johnson, D., & Grayson, K. (2005). Cognitive and Affective Trust in Service Relationships. Journal of Business Research, 58(4), 500–507
Parsons, A. G. (2002). Non-functional Motives for Online Shoppers: Why We Click. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 19(5), 380–392
Hu, M., Zhang, M., & Wang, Y. (2017). Why Do Audiences Choose to Keep Watching on Live Video Streaming Platforms? An Explanation of Dual Identification Framework. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 594–606
Kim, D. J., Ferrin, D. L., & Rao, H. R. (2008). A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents. Decision Support Systems, 44(2), 544–564.
Chiu, C. M., Chang, C. C., Cheng, H. L., & Fang, Y. H. (2009). Determinants of Customer Repurchase Intention in Online Shopping. Online Information Review, 33(4), 761–784.
Sashi, C. M. (2012). Customer Engagement, Buyer-Seller Relationships, and Social Media. Management Decision, 50(2), 253–272.
Schreuder, H. T., Gregoire, T. G., & Weyer, J. P. (2001). For what applications can probability and non-probability sampling be used? Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 66(3), 281–291.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. In Long Range Planning (Vol. 46).
Sugiono, P. D. (2014). Populasi dan Sampel. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. 80.
Smith, E. (2008). Using Secondary Data in Educational and Social Research (H. Torrance, ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 W.S. Dewobroto, S. Enrica
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
