Comparison on cooling efficiency of cooling pad materials for evaporative cooling system

Authors

  • Radhiyah Abd. Aziz Faculty of Manufacturing Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, 26600, Pekan, Pahang, Malaysia
  • Nurul Farahin Zamrud Faculty of Manufacturing Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, 26600, Pekan, Pahang, Malaysia
  • Nurrina Rosli Faculty of Manufacturing Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, 26600, Pekan, Pahang, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15282/jmmst.v1i1.199

Keywords:

Cooling pad, Evaporative cooling, Cooling efficiency, Temperature, Humidity

Abstract

This research aims to examine on cooling efficiency of different type natural based material as a cooling pad for evaporative cooling system. Efficiency of direct evaporative cooling system mostly depends on the cooling pad and hence, the material used in the cooling pad plays a very vital role. Here, two types of natural based materials (activated carbon foam and luffa pad) were selected to be used as cooling pad. Those materials pad are then fabricated to fit into the evaporative cooling setup. Temperature, and humidity are the most important data in this experimental analysis. The readings of these terms are taken for each type of cooling pad using data logger and also, the further calculations are done based on these readings. The material of the cooling pad and the air flow rate are varied to observe the effect on their cooling efficiency. From the analysis, the ACF cooling pad shows better cooling efficiency compared to that of luffa pad.

References

A. Malli, H. Reza, M. Layeghi, S. Sharifian, H. Behravesh. (2011), Investigating the performance of cellulosic evaporative cooling pads. Energy Conversion & Management. 52, 2598–2603.

A. Sachdeva, S.P.S. Rajput, A. Kothari. (2015). Performance analysis of direct evaporative cooling in Indian summer. International Journal of Research in Areronautical & Mechanical Engineering. 3, 131–141.

A.K. Mohammed, A.K. Mohammed. (2013). Experimental performance of two-stage evaporating cooling system. Scholars Journal of Engineering & Technology. 1, 122–127.

J.K. Jain, D.A. Hindoliya. (2011). Experimental performance of new evaporative cooling pad materials. Sustainable Cities & Society. 1, 252–256.

M.K. Chopra, R. Kumar. (2017). Design of new evaporative cooler and usage of different cooling pad materials for improved cooling efficiency. International Research Journal of Engineering & Technology. 4, 503-511.

K.T. Dhakulkar, M.R. Dharme. (2017). An experimental analysis of direct evaporative cooler by varying materials and thickness of cooling pad : A review. Imperial Journal of Interdisplinary Research. 3, 605–608.

V. Sreeram, B. Gebrehiwot, S. Sathyanarayan, D. Sawant, W.F. Street, T. Drive. (2015). Factors that affect the performance characteristics of wet cooling pads for data center applications. 31st Therm. Meas. Model. Manag. Symp. 195–202.

A.K.P. Parmeshwar Dubey. (2015). Experimental analysis of various cooling pads in evaporative cooling system. International Journal of Latest Trends in Engineering & Technology. 6, 302–314.

S. Shekhar, S. Suman, H.S. Moharana, D. Sethy. (2016). Performance of different pad materials in advanced desert coolers- A comparative study, International Journal of Engineering & Science Computing. 6, 4368–4371.

V.W. Khond, G.H.R. College. (2011). Experimental investigation of desert cooler performance using four different cooling pad materials, American Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research. 2, 418–421.

T. Gunhan, V. Demir, A.K. Yagcioglu. (2007). Evaluation of the suitability of some local materials as cooling pads. Biosystems Engineering. 96, 369–377.

R. Maurya, N. Shrivastava, V. Shrivastava. (2014). Performance evaluation of alternative evaporative cooling media. International Journal Scientific & Engineering Research. 5, 676–684.

R. Rawangkul, J. Khedari, J. Hirunlabh, B. Zeghmati. (2017). Performance analysis of a new sustainable evaporative cooling pad made from coconut coir. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering. 1, 117–131.

M.M. Kulkarni, K.N. Vijaykumar, N.A. Jadhav, M.J. Bhor, S.S. Shinde. (2015). Experimental Performance Evaluation of new cooling pad material for direct evaporating cooling for Pune summer conditions. International Journal of Engineering Trends & Technology. 22, 281–287.

N.N. Khobragade, A. Shrimannarayan, T. Sanstha. (2016). Experimental performance of different evaporative cooling pad material of direct evaporative cooler in hot and dry region. International Journal of Innov. Technol. Res. 4, 2920–2923.

S.I. Manuwa, S.O. Odey. (2012). Evaluation of pads and geometrical shapes for constructing evaporative cooling system. Modern Applied Science. 6, 45–53.

F. Al-sulaiman. (2002). Evaluation of the performance of local fibers in evaporative cooling, Energy Conversion & Management. 43, 2267–2273.

M. Da, C. Karaca, Y. Yildiz, A. Ba, Ö. Paydak. (2011). The effects of air velocity on the performance of pad evaporative cooling systems. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 6, 1813–1822.

N. Soponpongpipat, S. Kositchaimongkol, I. Technology. (2011). Recycled high-density polyethylene and rice husk as a wetted pad in evaporative cooling system. American Journal of Applied Science. 8, 186–191.

A. Kouchakzadeh, A. Brati. (2013). The evaluation of bulk charcoal as greenhouse evaporative cooling pad. Agricultural Engineering International. CIGR J. 15, 188–193.

P. Xu, X. Ma, X. Zhao, K.S. Fancey. (2016). Experimental investigation on performance of fabrics for indirect evaporative cooling applications. Building Environmental. 110, 104–114.

Downloads

Published

13-09-2018

How to Cite

Abd. Aziz, R., Zamrud, N. F., & Rosli, N. (2018). Comparison on cooling efficiency of cooling pad materials for evaporative cooling system. Journal of Modern Manufacturing Systems and Technology, 1, 61–68. https://doi.org/10.15282/jmmst.v1i1.199

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.