Effect of fuel particle size and blending ratio on syngas production and performance of co-gasification

M. Inayat; S.A. Sulaiman; A. Kumar; F.M. Guangul

doi:10.15282/jmes.10.2.2016.21.0205

Authors

M. Inayat Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, 32610 Bandar Seri Iskandar, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia
S.A. Sulaiman Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, 32610 Bandar Seri Iskandar, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia
A. Kumar Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, 382010 Gandhinagar, Ahmedabad, India
F.M. Guangul Department of Mechanical Engineering, Middle East College, Knowledge Oasis Muscat, P.B. No. 79, Al Rusayl, Postal Code: 124, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15282/jmes.10.2.2016.21.0205

Keywords:

co-gasification; particle size; blending ratio; biomass; syngas quality.

Abstract

Shortage of feedstock supply often happens in biomass gasification. Thus, the cogasification of blended biomass is a potential option to maintain feedstock supply for continuous gasification operations. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of biomass blending ratio and biomass particle size on the syngas quality and performance of the co-gasification process. The co-gasification of wood chips/coconut shells was carried out in a downdraft gasifier at a 400 L/min airflow rate. The biomass blending ratio varies at 80/20, 50/50 and 20/80 (w/w) with biomass particle sizes of 5-10, 10-25 and 25- 50 mm. The results show that small particle size favours gas composition. The highest H₂ (10.91%), CO (25.60%), and CH₄ (2.79%) levels were obtained from the 5-10 mm particle size at 80/20, 50/50, and 20/80 blending ratios, respectively. Higher HHV and gas yield were obtained at the 20/80 blending ratio with the 5-10 and 10-25 mm particle sizes, respectively. Cold gas efficiency varies from 54.37 to 65.52%. The trend shows that at smaller particle sizes, cold gas efficiency is higher, while in most cases, carbon conversion efficiency was found to be more than 90% during co-gasification. The syngas quality and performance of co-gasification were more sensitive to biomass particle size as compared to the blending ratio.

References

Yu F, Bo X, Klaus G, Gong C, Jingbo W. Influence of Particle Size and Temperature on Gasification Performance in Externally Heated Gasifier Smart Grid and Renewable Energy. 2011;2:158-64.

Aigner I, Wolfesberger U, Hofbauer H. Tar content and composition in producer gas of fluidized bed gasification and low temperature pyrolysis of straw and wood – influence of temperature. International conference on polygeneration strategies. Vienna2009.

Waliullah Bhuiyan AM, Mojumdar MRR, Hasan AKMK. An improved method to generate electricity and precipitated silica from rice husk: Perspective Bangladesh. International Journal of Environmental Scicence and Development. 2011;2.

Omer AM. Built environment: Relating the benefits of renewable energy technologies. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering. 2012;5:561-75.

Wei L, Pordesimo LO, Haryanto A, Wooten J. Co-gasification of hardwood chips and crude glycerol in a pilot scale downdraft gasifier. Bioresource Technology. 2011;102:6266-72.

Ahmed II, Nipattummakul N, Gupta AK. Characteristics of syngas from co- gasification of polyethylene and woodchips. Applied Energy. 2011;88:165-74.

Lapuerta M, Hernández JJ, Pazo A, López J. Gasification and co-gasification of biomass wastes: Effect of the biomass origin and the gasifier operating conditions. Fuel Processing Technology. 2008;89:828-37.

Mahgoub B, Sulaiman S, Karim Z, Hagos F. Experimental study on the effect of varying syngas composition on the emissions of dual fuel CI engine operating at various engine speeds. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering: IOP Publishing; 2015. p. 012006.

Krerkkaiwan S, Fushimi C, Tsutsumi A, Kuchonthara P. Synergetic effect during co-pyrolysis/gasification of biomass and sub-bituminous coal. Fuel Processing Technology. 2013;115:11-8.

Sulaiman SA, Balamohan S, Moni MNZ, Atnaw SM, Mohamed AO. Feasibility study of gasification of oil palm fronds. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences. 2015;9:1744-57.

Sulaiman SA, Mat Razali NH, Konda RE, Atnaw SM, Moni MNZ. On the Diversification of Feedstock in Gasification of Oil Palm Fronds. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences. 2014;6:907-15.

Muda N, Boosroh MH. Gasification of Coal-Petcoke Blends in a Pilot Scale Gasification Plant. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering. 2013;8:1457-66.

Guangul FM. Gasification of oil palm fronds with preheated inlet air. Malaysia: Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS; 2013.

Guangul FM, Sulaiman SA, Ramli A. Gasifier selection, design and gasification of oil palm fronds with preheated and unheated gasifying air. Bioresource Technology. 2012;126:224-32.

Guangul FM, Sulaiman SA, Ramli A. Study of the effects of operating factors on the resulting producer gas of oil palm fronds gasification with a single throat downdraft gasifier. Renewable Energy. 2014;72:271-83.

Atnaw SM, Sulaiman SA, Yusup S. Syngas production from downdraft gasification of oil palm fronds. Energy. 2013;61:491-501.

Mahgoub BKM, Sulaiman SA, Abdul Karim ZA. Performance Study of Imitated Syngas in a Dual-Fuel Compression Ignition Diesel Engine. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering. 2015;11:2282-93.

Cai J, Wang Y, Zhou L, Huang Q. Thermogravimetric analysis and kinetics of coal/plastic blends during co-pyrolysis in nitrogen atmosphere. Fuel Processing Technology. 2008;89:21-7.

Chin BLF, Yusup S, Al Shoaibi A, Kannan P, Srinivasakannan C, Sulaiman SA. Kinetic studies of co-pyrolysis of rubber seed shell with high density polyethylene. Energy Conversion and Management. 2014;87:746-53.

Inayat M, Sulaiman SA, Abd Jamil A, Guangul FM, Atnaw SM. The Study of Temperature Profile and Syngas Flare in Co-gasification of Biomass Feedstock in Throated Downdraft Gasifier. In: Hashim AM, editor. ICGSCE 2014: Proceedings of the International Conference on Global Sustainability and Chemical Engineering. Singapore: Springer Singapore; 2015. p. 203-10.

Kaewpanha M, Guan G, Hao X, Wang Z, Kasai Y, Kusakabe K, et al. Steam co- gasification of brown seaweed and land-based biomass. Fuel Processing Technology. 2014;120:106-12.

Buragohain B, Mahanta P, Moholkar VS. Investigations in gasification of biomass mixtures using thermodynamic equilibrium and semi–equilibrium models. International Journal of Energy and Environment. 2011;2:551-78.

He L, Kati G, Matthias G. An Experimental Investigation of Fluidized Bed Gasification of Biomass Blended from Wood, Miscanthus, Straw and other Industrial Bioresidues. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 2012;B 2 1109-18.

Pinto F, Andre RN, Neves D, Varela F, Santos J, Miranda M, et al. Effect of biomass type blended with rice production wastes in syngas produced by co- gasification. In: Vilas AM, editor. Materials and Techanology for Energy Efficiency. Boca Raton, Florida, USA: Brown Walker Pass; 2015. p. 7-11.

Jeya Singh VC, Sekhar SJ. Performance studies on a downdraft biomass gasifier with blends of coconut shell and rubber seed shell as feedstock. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2016;97:22-7.

Kök MV, Özbas E, Hicyilmaz C, Karacan Ö. Effect of particle size on the thermal and combustion properties of coal. Thermochimica Acta. 1997;302:125-30.

Yu D, Xu M, Sui J, Liu X, Yu Y, Cao Q. Effect of coal particle size on the proximate composition and combustion properties. Thermochimica Acta. 2005;439:103-9.

Zhang C, Jiang X, Wei L, Wang H. Research on pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of super fine and conventional pulverized coal. Energy Conversion and Management. 2007;48:797-802.

Karimipour S, Gerspacher R, Gupta R, Spiteri RJ. Study of factors affecting syngas quality and their interactions in fluidized bed gasification of lignite coal. Fuel. 2013;103:308-20.

Luo S, Xiao B, Guo X, Hu Z, Liu S, He M. Hydrogen-rich gas from catalytic steam gasification of biomass in a fixed bed reactor: Influence of particle size on gasification performance. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2009;34:1260-4.

ASTM. ASTM Standard E872-82. Standard Test Method for Volatile Matter in the Analysis of Particulate Wood Fuels. Pennsylvania, USA.: ASTM International; 2013.

ASTM. ASTM Standard E1755-01. Standard Method for the Determination of Ash in Biomass. Philadelphia, USA: ASTM International; 2007.

ASTM. ASTM Standard D3176-09 Standard Practice for Ultimate Analysis of Coal and Coke. West Conshohocken: ASTM International; 2009.

ASTM. ASTM Standard D4809-00. Standard Test Method for Heat of Combustion of Liquid Hydrocarbon Fuels by Bomb Calorimeter (Precision Method). Pennsylvania, USA: ASTM International; 2013.

Fremaux S, Beheshti S-M, Ghassemi H, Shahsavan-Markadeh R. An experimental study on hydrogen-rich gas production via steam gasification of biomass in a research-scale fluidized bed. Energy Conversion and Management. 2015;91:427-32.

Lv X, Xiao J, Du Y, Shen L, Zhou Y. Experimental study on biomass steam gasification for hydrogen-rich gas in double-bed reactor. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2014;39:20968-78.

Bhattacharya SC, Mizanur Rahman Siddique AHM, Pham H-L. A study on wood gasification for low-tar gas production. Energy. 1999;24:285-96.

Herguido J, Corella J, Gonzalez-Saiz J. Steam gasification of lignocellulosic residues in a fluidized bed at a small pilot scale. Effect of the type of feedstock. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 1992;31:1274-82.

Lv P, Chang J, Xiong Z, Huang H, Wu C, Chen Y, et al. Biomass Air−Steam Gasification in a Fluidized Bed to Produce Hydrogen-Rich Gas. Energy & Fuels. 2003;17:677-82.

Kirubakaran V, Sivaramakrishnan V, Nalini R, Sekar T, Premalatha M, Subramanian P. A review on gasification of biomass. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2009;13:179-86.

Taba E, Leila, Irfan MF, Wan Daud WMA, Chakrabarti MH. Fuel blending effects on the co-gasification of coal and biomass – A review. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2013;57:249-63.

Basu P. Biomass Gasification, Pyrolysis, and Torrefaction Practical Design and Theory. Second ed. United States of America: Elsevier’s Science & Technology; 2013.

Taba E, Leila,, Irfan MF, Wan Daud WAM, Chakrabarti MH. The effect of temperature on various parameters in coal, biomass and CO-gasification: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2012;16:5584-96.

Senapati PK, Behera S. Experimental investigation on an entrained flow type biomass gasification system using coconut coir dust as powdery biomass feedstock. Bioresource Technology. 2012;117:99-106.

Hernández JJ, Aranda-Almansa G, Bula A. Gasification of biomass wastes in an entrained flow gasifier: Effect of the particle size and the residence time. Fuel Processing Technology. 2010;91:681-92.