Computational fluid dynamics analysis of a ship’s side launching in restricted waters

Authors

  • A. Fitriadhy Program of Maritime Technology, School of Ocean Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Malaysia
  • A.M.A. Malek Program of Maritime Technology, School of Ocean Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15282/jmes.11.4.2017.3.0269

Keywords:

Side launching; platform angle; platform distance; tipping time.

Abstract

In the presence of a highly complex phenomenon during a ship’s side launching, a more reliable approach to predict the launching performance is thus required. To achieve the objective, a Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) simulation is proposed to obtain more accurate results. Several parameters such as various angles and lengths of the sliding platforms have been taken into account in the simulation which was aimed at providing an insight into their dependencies on the ship’s side launching performance, mainly quantified as the ship’s tipping time. Computational simulations revealed that an increase of the platform’s angle from 3° to 4° had led to an increase in the launching speed percentage by 17.9%, which consequently resulted in faster tipping time of about 21.4% compared to the increase of the platform’s angle from 4° to 5°. However, opposite results were shown as the tipping time became slower by 22.2% and 9.1% due to the increase of d/L ratios from 0.13 to 0.18 and from 0.18 to 0.23, respectively. It is generally concluded that increasing the platform’s angle and decreasing the d/L ratios can result in faster tipping time. With regards to the CFD results, these preliminary findings can act as best practice guidelines, especially for naval architect engineers.

References

Ozkok M, Cebi S. A fuzzy based assessment method for comparison of ship launching methods. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems. 2014;26:781-91.

Rudan S, Urem J, Zaninović A. Comparison of ship launching evaluation methods. XX Symposium on Theory and Practice in Shipbuilding SORTA 2012. 2012.

Kraskowski M. Simplified RANSE simulation of a side launching. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering. 2007;7:151-9.

Nowacki H, Valleriani M, Max-Planck-Institut fuer Wissenschaftsgeschichte B. Shipbuilding practice and ship design methods from the Renaissance to the 18th century—a workshop report. 2003.

Ye Z. Dynamics of ships side launching. Computers & Structures. 1994;53:861-5.

Hak B. Numerical simulation of the side launching of a ship: University of Groningen; 2005.

Qingdao. Qingdao Evergreen Shipping Supplies Co., Ltd. 2009.

Flow3D 10.1.1 User Manual: Flow Science Inc.; 2013.

Koutsourakis N, Bartzis JG, Markatos NC. Evaluation of Reynolds stress, k-ε and RNG k-ε turbulence models in street canyon flows using various experimental datasets. Environmental Fluid Mechanics. 2012:1-25.

Yakhot A, Rakib S, Flannery W. Low-Reynolds number approximation for turbulent eddy viscosity. Journal of Scientific Computing. 1994;9:283-92.

Yakhot V, Orszag SA. Renormalization group analysis of turbulence. I. Basic theory. Journal of Scientific Computing. 1986;1:3-51.

Saad I, Bari S. CFD investigation of in-cylinder air flow to optimize number of guide vanes to improve ci engine performance using higher viscous fuel. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering. 2013;8:1096-107.

Lam S, Shuaib N, Hasini H, Shuaib N. Computational Fluid Dynamics Investigation on the Use of Heat Shields for Thermal Management in a Car Underhood. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering. 2012;6:785-96.

Volenyuk L, Rashkovskyi A. Ship stability analysis during launching from longitudinal sloping slipway by pneumatic airbags. International Shipbuilding Progress. 2017:1-10.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-31

How to Cite

[1]
A. Fitriadhy and A. Malek, “Computational fluid dynamics analysis of a ship’s side launching in restricted waters”, J. Mech. Eng. Sci., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 2289–4659, Dec. 2017.