Anthropomorphic Metaphors in Iban Proverbs: A Semantic-Inquisitive Analysis

Authors

  • Sylvia Jembau Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Malaysia
  • Mary Fatimah Subet Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Malaysia
  • Muhammad Zaid Daud Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15282/ijleal.v16i1.13162

Keywords:

Anthropomorphic metaphor, Body-part symbolism , Iban proverbs, Indigenous cognition, Semantic-inquisitive analysis

Abstract

The current study assesses anthropomorphic metaphors in Iban proverbs (Jaku Sempama) to determine how physiological symbolism encodes indigenous cognition, moral reasoning, and sociocultural insight. A qualitative methodology, namely the document-based approach, was employed to scrutinise 54 proverbs extracted from Sempama Jaku Iban (Umping, 2010) using the semantic-inquisitive framework with three analytical tiers: script semantics, resonant semantics, and inquisitive semantics. Five metaphorical categories were examined, namely the head, face, eyes, fingers, and body, to uncover how these anatomical parts could serve as conceptual mediums for communicating distorted perception, moral burden, impulsive demeanour, emotional fragility, and superficial social cohesion. Each metaphor demonstrated how the Iban community embedded cultural critique and ethical philosophy in corporeal imagery, transforming the human body into a semantic medium for encoding culturally shaped intelligence, or akal budi. The results corroborated the view that Jaku Sempama functioned as a cognitive rather than solely a stylistic medium, underscoring the pragmatic inference, evaluative stance, and epistemological logic inherent in indigenous oral traditions by applying conceptual metaphor theory and relevance theory. The findings also significantly contributed to the international typology of metaphors by incorporating Iban figurative language into the wider theoretical and cultural context. This study also recommended greater documentation and the integration of indigenous metaphor systems into linguistic preservation endeavours and intercultural communication models, as metaphors operate not only as linguistic heritage but also as cognitive artefacts for comprehending communal identity, emotion, and social order.

References

Adisa, O. (2023). Speaking of animals: A conceptual analysis of animal metaphors in Yoruba. Yoruba Studies Review, 8(2), 115–134. https://journals.flvc.org/ysr/article/view/134895

Agyekum, K. (2023). Sociocultural aspects of animal metaphor in Akan. Journal of West African Languages, 51(1),104–120. https://l1nq.com/6dC6B

Aidid, S. B. (1998). Siri bacaan pelajar utusan: Epidemik. Utusan Publication & Distribution Sdn. Bhd.

Baranyiné Kóczy, J. (2024). Anthropomorphic nature in Hungarian folklore: What tree metaphors reveal about human life. In J.

Baranyiné Kóczy & V. Szelid (Eds.), Cultural Linguistics and (Re) conceptualised tradition - Past in present (pp. 217–236). Springer Nature.

Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4-5), 585–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407

Daud, M. Z., & Subet, M. F. (2021). Naratif Puteri Santubong dan Puteri Sejinjang mempertalikan politik tempatan: Analisis pragmatik. Issues in Language Studies, 10(1), 110–130. https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.2552.2021

Daud, M. Z., & Subet, M. F. (2022). Ayam sebagai rujukan makna inkuisitif berhati-hati, sia-sia dan khianat dalam peribahasa Melayu. Kajian Malaysia, 40(1), 179–253. https://doi.org/10.21315/km2022.40.1.9

Daud, M. Z., Abd Wahid, M. S. N., & Gedat, R. (2017). Eufemisme dalam bahasa Iban: Satu kajian kes di Kampung Lebor, Serian, Sarawak. Borneo Research Journal, 11(1), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.22452/brj.vol11no1.6

Daud, M. Z., Abd Wahid, M. S. N., & Gedat, R. (2018). Penggunaan Eufemisme dalam Kalangan Penutur Iban. International Journal of Language Education and Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 27–14. https://doi.org/10.15282/ijleal.v8.528

Daud, M. Z., Abdullah, N. A., & Subet, M. F. (2021). Refleksi sisi negatif burung gagak dalam peribahasa Melayu: Analisis semantik inkuisitif. Issues in Language Studies, 10(2), 24–44. https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.2764.2021

Dewek, M. S., & Ali, R. (2024). Imej anggota badan dalam peribahasa Melayu Sarawak: Satu analisis semantik inkuisitif. Jurnal Pengajian Melayu, 35(2), 118–137. https://l1nq.com/No3dH

Douglas, R. S. M., Subet, M. F., & Daud, M. Z. (2023). Jelmaan reptilia dalam akal budi masyarakat Iban: Analisis semantik inkuisitif. Asian People Journal, 6(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.37231/apj.2023.6.2.318

Douglas, R. S. M., Subet, M. F., & Daud, M. Z. (2024). Akal budi dalam Sempama Jaku Iban (peribahasa) berimejkan mamalia berdasarkan perspektif semantik inkuisitif. RENTAS: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastera dan Budaya, 3(1), 95–117. https://doi.org/10.32890/rentas2024.3.5

Ensiring, J. A., Umbat, J., & Saleh, R. M. (Eds.). (2011). Bup sereba reti jaku Iban. Tun Jugah Foundation.

Geertz, C. (2017). The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books.

Gigerenzer, G., Gaissmaier, W., Kurz-Milcke, E., Schwartz, L. M., & Woloshin, S. (2007). Helping doctors and patients make sense of health statistics. Psychological science in the public interest, 8(2), 53–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6053.2008.00033.x

Goffman, E. (2017). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Routledge.

Gross, J. J. (2002). Emotion regulation: Affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology, 39(3), 281–291. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0048577201393198

Hairani, E. (2021). Kajian kognitif semantik inkuisitif penggunaan anggota tubuh dalam peribahasa Indonesia [Unpublished master's thesis]. Universitas Negeri Medan.

Hassan, Z. (2001). Penggunaan unsur alam sebagai perlambangan dalam puisi Melayu moden [Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Putra Malaysia].

Idegbekwe, D. (2020). Anthropomorphisms and the Nigerian Pidgin proverbs: A linguistic conceptual metaphorical analysis. EBSU Journal of Social Science Review, 10(1), 71–76.

Ismail, E., Daud, M. Z., Mohamed, S., Sulaiman, N., Abidin, N. Z., Ali, N. F., & Bakar, A. Y. A. (2023). Analysing the psychological characteristics and personality traits of Young Engineers and Technologists (YET) in Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTeM). Journal for ReAttach Therapy and Developmental Diversities, 6(7s), 525–529. https://jrtdd.com/index.php/journal/article/view/828

Jalaluddin, N. J. (2014). Semantik dan akal budi Melayu. Penerbit UKM.

Jeffrey, R. D., & Subet, M. F. (2018). Unsur alam dalam peribahasa Iban (Jaku'Sempama): Satu analisis Semantik Inkiusitif. Trends in Undergraduate Research, 1(1), f10–15. https://doi.org/10.33736/tur.1169.2018

Jonteng, S. E., Yahya, Y., Salleh, S. F., Abdullah, N. A., & Subet, M. F. (2021). Imej perlambangan ‘tangan’ dalam simpulan bahasa Melayu: Analisis semantik inkuisitif. Asian People Journal, 4(1), 108–131. https://doi.org/10.37231/apj.2021.4.1.261

Kamus Iban-Melayu dewan edisi kedua. (2020). Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Kasdan, J., & Nopiah, J. (2021). Padi dalam peribahasa Melayu: Analisis semantik inkuisitif. International Journal of the Malay World and Civilisation, 9(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.17576/jatma-2021-0901-06

Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford University Press.

Krikmann, A. (2007, November). The great chain of being as the background of personificatory and depersonificatory metaphors in proverbs and elsewhere [Paper presentation]. 1st Interdisciplinary Colloquium on Proverbs, Tavira (Algarve), Portugal.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.

Lanson, J. (2011, March 28). Lonjakkan Bahasa Iban ke peringkat lebih tinggi. The Borneo Post. https://l1nq.com/DN3Nn

Larson, B. (2011). Metaphors for environmental sustainability: Redefining our relationship with nature. Yale University Press.

Liamputtong, P. (2010). Performing qualitative cross-cultural research. Cambridge University Press.

Mengga, N. A. (2023). Unsur tumbuhan sebagai perlambangan dalam peribahasa Iban. PENDETA, 14(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.37134/pendeta.vol14.2.1.2023

Mihas, E. (2012). Bodily-based conceptual metaphors in Ashéninka Perené myths and folk stories. In A. Idström & E. Piirainen (Eds.), Endangered metaphors (pp. 145-160). John Benjamins Publishing.

Murthy, T., Subet, M. F., & Daud, M. Z. (2019). Kajian semantik inkuisitif dalam peribahasa Tamil: Imej tumbuhan. Sains Humanika, 11(1), 73–80. https://l1nq.com/Lafyn

Nasir, M. R. B. M., & Subet, M. F. (2019). Analisis semantik inkuisitif peribahasa bahasa Melayu. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 16(2), 227-253. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2019.16.2.9

Nasir, M. R. M., & Subet, M. F. (2023). Malay proverbs in an inquisitive semantics approach lens: The case of Malaysian textbooks. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 317-32. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v13i2.63086

Nugraha, D. S. (2023). Comparing the representation of anger in the Indonesian and English proverbs: A study based on the cognitive semantics analysis and the contrastive method. International Journal of Social Science and Education Research Studies, 3(12), 2327–2342. https://doi.org/10.55677/ijssers/V03I12Y2023-04

Occhi, D. J. (2014). Sloppy selfhood: Metaphor, embodiment, animism and anthropomorphisation in Japanese language and culture. In M. Yamaguchi, D. Tay, & B. Blount (Eds.), Approaches to language, culture, and cognition: The intersection of cognitive linguistics and linguistic anthropology (p. 124–144). Springer.

Omar, A. (1986). Bahasa dan alam pemikiran Melayu. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Pourhossein, S. (2016). Animal metaphors in Persian and Turkish proverbs: A cognitive linguistic study. [Doctoral dissertation, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara, Türkiye].

Pumma, S. (2013). A study of the language and culture of ''/khi:/'' (feces) of Lao-Wiang in Nong Kop Subdistrict, Ban Pong District, Ratchaburi Province. Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences Studies, 13(2), 47–68. https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/hasss/article/view/12577

Ritos, S., & Daud, M. Z. (2020). Strategi penggantian disfemisme kepada eufemisme dalam komunikasi lisan masyarakat Bidayuh, Bau: analisis Pragmatik. Asian People Journal (APJ), 3(1), 64-83. https://doi.org/10.37231/apj.2020.3.1.153

Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Harvard University Press.

Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Blackwell.

Sultan, A. A. M., Ismail, E., Saad, M. S. M., Husain, A. H., Daud, M. Z., & Alswat, H. M. (2024). Impact of social media on higher education: Academic performance, leadership and co-curricular activity engagement. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 8(5), Article 2025142. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2025142

The Encyclopedia of Iban Studies. (2001). Tun Jugah Foundation.

Ting-Toomey, S. (2005). The matrix of face: An updated face-negotiation theory. In W. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorising about intercultural communication (pp. 71–92). SAGE.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683

Umping, C. K. (2010). Sempama Jaku Iban. Sarawak Iban Writer Association.

Wibowo, D. S. (2008). Anatomi tubuh manusia. Grasindo.

Published

2026-02-23

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Jembau, S., Subet, M. F., & Daud, M. Z. (2026). Anthropomorphic Metaphors in Iban Proverbs: A Semantic-Inquisitive Analysis. International Journal of Language Education and Applied Linguistics, 16(1), 37-50. https://doi.org/10.15282/ijleal.v16i1.13162

Similar Articles

1-10 of 83

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.