Sulfate Resistance of Green Concrete Incorporating Ceramic Waste Powder and Sugarcane Bagasse Ash
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15282/construction.v5i2.12796Keywords:
Green concrete, Ceramic waste powder, Sugarcane bagasse ash, Sulfate resistance, Strength retention, Waste valorizationAbstract
This study investigates the sulfate resistance of green concrete incorporating ceramic waste powder (CWP) and sugarcane bagasse ash (SCBA) as supplementary cementitious materials. The objective was to evaluate the impact of binary CWP–SCBA replacements on the durability and mechanical performance of concrete subjected to prolonged sulfate exposure. Six concrete mixes were developed with varying replacement levels (0–30%) by total binder weight. The experimental program assessed workability, compressive strength, mass change, and strength retention of specimens exposed to a 5% sodium sulfate solution for up to 90 days. The results showed that incorporating CWP and SCBA slightly reduced slump and density but significantly enhanced sulfate resistance compared to the control. The mix containing 15% SCBA and 5% CWP (M5) achieved the lowest mass loss and the highest strength retention (80.3%) after 90 days. This improvement was attributed to the pozzolanic activity and filler effects, which refined the microstructure and reduced permeability. These findings demonstrate that the combined use of ceramic and agricultural waste can improve concrete durability in sulfate-rich environments, supporting sustainable construction and waste valorization. The study recommends the partial replacement of Portland cement with CWP and SCBA as a viable and eco-friendly approach for enhancing concrete longevity in aggressive conditions.
Downloads
References
[1] A. S. Baba, A. A. Umar, A. Abubakar, and T. Adagba, “Application of response surface methodology in predicting and optimizing the properties of concrete containing ground scoria and metakaolin blended cement in concrete,” Journal of Civil Engineering Frontiers, vol. 4, no. 2, 2023. https://doi.org/10.38094/jocef40269
[2] A. I. Nicoara, A. E. Stoica, M. Vrabec, N. Š. Rogan, S. Sturm, C. Ow-Yang, et al., “End-of-life materials used as supplementary cementitious materials in the concrete industry,” Materials, vol. 13, no. 8, p. 1954, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13081954
[3] U. J. Alengaram, “Effect of non-traditional supplementary cementitious materials in concrete,” in Integrative Approaches in Urban Sustainability—Architectural Design, Technological Innovations and Social Dynamics in Global Contexts, IntechOpen, 2023. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.111900
[4] N. P. Kannikachalam, D. di Summa, R. P. Borg, E. Cuenca, M. Parpanesi, N. De Belie, and L. Ferrara, “Assessment of sustainability and self-healing performances of recycled ultra-high-performance concrete,” Materials Journal, vol. 120, no. 1, pp. 117–132, 2022. https://doi.org/10.14359/51737336
[5] M. Ebrahimi, A. Eslami, I. Hajirasouliha, M. Ramezanpour, and K. Pilakoutas, “Effect of ceramic waste powder as a binder replacement on the properties of cement-and lime-based mortars,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 379, p. 131146, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131146
[6] M. Attaelmanan, M. E. M. Kambal, and M. I. Mansour, “A study the effect of using ceramic waste powder as partial replacement for cement on concrete properties,” Journal of Karary University for Engineering and Science, 2021. https://doi.org/10.54388/jkues.v1i1.125
[7] B. R. Nalli and P. Vysyaraju, “Utilization of ceramic waste powder and rice husk ash as a partial replacement of cement in concrete,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 982, no. 1, p. 012003, IOP Publishing, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/982/1/012003
[8] O. Dehghani, A. Eslami, M. A. Mahdavipour, D. Mostofinejad, M. G. Mooselu, and K. Pilakoutas, “Ceramic waste powder as a cement replacement in concrete paving blocks: mechanical properties and environmental assessment,” International Journal of Pavement Engineering, vol. 25, no. 1, p. 2370563, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2024.2370563
[9] V. T. de Sande, M. Sadique, P. Pineda, A. Bras, W. Atherton, and M. Riley, “Potential use of sugar cane bagasse ash as sand replacement for durable concrete,” Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 39, p. 102277, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102277
[10] S. França, L. N. Sousa, S. L. C. Saraiva, M. C. N. F. Ferreira, M. V. M. S. Silva, R. C. Gomes, et al., “Feasibility of using sugar cane bagasse ash in partial replacement of portland cement clinker,” Buildings, vol. 13, no. 4, p. 843, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12101769
[11] O. O. Metalssi, R. Ragoug, F. Barberon, J.-B. d’Espinose de Lacaillerie, N. Roussel, L. Divet, et al., “Effect of an early-age exposure on the degradation mechanisms of cement paste under external sulfate attack,” Materials, vol. 16, no. 17, p. 6013, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16176013
[12] C. Shang, C. Wu, Y. Liu, J. Wang, Q. Fu, L. Lu, et al., “Impact of sulfoaluminate cement modification on corrosion resistance of reactive powder concrete subjected to ammonium sulfate-rich sewer environment,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 411, p. 134652, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.134652
[13] D. N. Subramaniam and N. Sathiparan, “Comparative study of fly ash and rice husk ash as cement replacement in pervious concrete: Mechanical characteristics and sustainability analysis,” International Journal of Pavement Engineering, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 2075867, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2022.2075867
[14] S. A. Agboola, A. A. Abdulraheem, K. I. Abbas, A. R. A. Akewusola, M. A. Kolawole, and M. S. Olawale, “Experimental investigation of the durability properties of concrete produced with metakaolin as partial replacement of cement,” FUDMA Journal of Sciences, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 149–162, 2024. https://doi.org/10.33003/fjs-2024-0802-2127
[15] M. D. Yehualaw, M. A. Fentie, and B. W. Yifru, “Effect of partial replacement of cement by metakaolin on engineering properties of concrete,” in Advancement of Science and Technology: Materials and Energy, Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2023, pp. 89–101.
[16] D.-H. Vo, C.-L. Hwang, K.-D. Tran Thi, M. D. Yehualaw, and W.-C. Chen, “Effect of fly ash and reactive MgO on the engineering properties and durability of high-performance concrete produced with alkali-activated slag and recycled aggregate,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 1–11, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)mt.1943-5533.0003420
[17] P. Reiterman, O. Holčapek, R. Jaskulski, and W. Kubissa, “Long-term behaviour of ceramic powder containing concrete for pavement blocks,” International Journal of Pavement Engineering, vol. 22, no. 14, pp. 1813–1820, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2020.1725006
[18] O. O. Metalssi, M. Quiertant, M. Jabbour, and V. Baroghel-Bouny, “Effect of exposure conditions on mortar subjected to an external sulfate attack,” Materials, vol. 17, no. 13, p. 3198, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17133198
[19] X. Lv, L. Yang, J. Li, and F. Wang, “Roles of fly ash, granulated blast-furnace slag, and silica fume in long-term resistance to external sulfate attacks at atmospheric temperature,” Cement and Concrete Composites, vol. 133, p. 104696, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104696
[20] British Standards Institution, BS EN 197-1:2011 – Cement – Part 1: Composition, specifications and conformity criteria for common cements, London, UK: BSI, 2011.
[21] British Standards Institution, BS EN 450-1:2012 – Fly ash for concrete – Part 1: Definition, specifications and conformity criteria, London, UK: BSI, 2012.
[22] British Standards Institution, BS EN 12620:2013 – Aggregates for concrete, London, UK: BSI, 2013.
[23] British Standards Institution, BS EN 1008:2002 – Mixing water for concrete – Specification for sampling, testing and assessing the suitability of water, including water recovered from processes in the concrete industry, London, UK: BSI, 2002.
[24] American Concrete Institute (ACI), ACI 211.1 – Standard Practice for Selecting Proportions for Normal, Heavyweight, and Mass Concrete, Farmington Hills, MI: ACI, 2009.
[25] British Standards Institution, BS EN 12350-2:2019 – Testing fresh concrete. Slump test, London, UK: BSI, 2019
[26] ASTM International, ASTM C138/C138M-17a – Standard Test Method for Density (Unit Weight), Yield, and Air Content (Gravimetric) of Concrete, West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2017.
[27] British Standards Institution, BS EN 12390-3:2019 – Testing hardened concrete – Part 3: Compressive strength of test specimens, London, UK: BSI, 2019.
[28] British Standards Institution, BS EN 12390-13:2013 – Testing hardened concrete – Part 13: Determination of secant modulus of elasticity in compression, London, UK: BSI, 2013.
[29] ASTM International, ASTM C642 – Standard Test Method for Density, Absorption, and Voids in Hardened Concrete, West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2013.
[30] BSI, Concrete – Specification, performance, production and conformity, BS EN 206:2013+A1:2016, British Standards Institution, London, UK, 2016.
[31] BS EN 206:2013, Concrete – Specification, performance, production and conformity. British Standards Institution, London, 2013.
[32] M. Kasaniya, M. D. Thomas, and E. G. Moffatt, “Pozzolanic reactivity of natural pozzolans, ground glasses and coal bottom ashes and implication of their incorporation on the chloride permeability of concrete,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 139, p. 106259, 2021.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106259
[33] M. Kasaniya, M. D. Thomas, and E. G. Moffatt, “Pozzolanic reactivity of natural pozzolans, ground glasses and coal bottom ashes and implication of their incorporation on the chloride permeability of concrete,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 139, p. 106259, 2021.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106259
[34] L. Guo, Y. Wu, F. Xu, X. Song, J. Ye, P. Duan, and Z. Zhang, “Sulfate resistance of hybrid fiber reinforced metakaolin geopolymer composites,” Composites Part B: Engineering, vol. 183, p. 107689, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107689
[35] S. Chang, F. Gao, L. Wang, Q. Jin, S. Liu, and L. Wan, “Deterioration mechanism of supersulfated cement paste exposed to sulfate attack and combined acid-sulfate attack,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 414, p. 134978, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.134978
[36] H. Cheng, T. Liu, D. Zou, and A. Zhou, “Compressive strength assessment of sulfate-attacked concrete by using sulfate ions distributions,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 293, p. 123550, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123550
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
