Designing the Re-layout of the Production Floor Using Integrated Systematic Layout Planning (SLP) and Simulation Methods
In the manufacturing company, an efficient production floor affects the productivity of the company. Thus, a well design production floor layout assists the company to achieve its objectives. In this regard, this study aims to design a new alternative production floor layout for the XYZ manufacturing company. The company facing the facility layout problem (FLP) where their workstation on the production floor was not located based on the activity-relationship. Thus, the company struggles to reduce the distance travel of their workers from one station to another by re-layout their production floor. The Systematic Layout Planning (SLP) method was used to determine the best new alternative layout for the company. Subsequently, the AnyLogic simulation software was utilized to test the effectiveness of the layout by using the number of steps as the parameter. As a result, it is found that the total number of steps of workers in the production floor can be reduced from 16,554 steps (in existing layout) to 15,956 steps (in new alternative layout).
Febriandini, I.F. (2019). Re-design facility layout using systematic layout planning method : a re-design facility layout using systematic layout planning method : a case study : Biopro Cosmeceutical Sdn . Bhd. In OP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 495, No. 1, p. 012027). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/495/1/012027.
Jain, M. S., & Yadav, T. K. (2017). Systematic layout planning : A review of improvement in approach to pulse processing mills, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), 4(5), 503-507.
Low, X. F., & Wong, K. Y. (2017). Redesign and simulation of facility layout in a manufacturing company, Jurnal Mekanikal, 40(2), 53–60.
Maina, E. C., Muchiri, P. N., & Keraita, J. N. (2018). Improvement of Facility Layout Using Systematic Layout Planning, 08(5), 33–43.
Naik, S. B. (2016). A literature review on efficient, 7(2), 43–51.