HOW CONTROLLING SHAREHOLDERS PLAY THEIR DECISIVE ROLES IN CORPORATE SOCIAL INVESTMENTS: A CASE STUDY OF PAKISTAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15282/ijim.19.2.2025.11223Keywords:
Controlling shareholders, Corporate social responsibility, Nonlinear, Panel regression, Pakistani listed firmsAbstract
This study examines the role of controlling shareholders in determining the level of corporate social responsibility (CSR) investments. The data was collected from Pakistani listed firms and analysed using the panel regression technique. The results revealed that controlling shareholders have direct and nonlinear relationships (U-shaped) with social investments. The U-shaped relationship indicates that CSR investments decrease at lower levels of shareholders and increase when controlling shareholders own more shares. Subsequently, controlling shareholders may be risk-averse or consciously keep lower level of CSR investments while owning less shares. However, CSR investments may later increase as controlling shareholders own more shares for reputation and survivability concerns. The findings are useful for managers and policymakers to explore the impact of main corporate governance actors (i.e., controlling shareholders) towards CSR investments. It offers guidelines for managers, minority shareholders, and the government regarding CSR investments and whether controlling shareholders will align or contradict these endeavours. The study also extends the theoretical boundaries of the agency theory and reference point for developing economies with weak governance mechanisms and poor investor protection.
References
Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932-968.
Al-Shaer, H., Uyar, A., Kuzey, C., & Karaman, A. S. (2023). Do shareholders punish or reward excessive CSR engagement? Moderating effect of cash flow and firm growth. International Review of Financial Analysis, 88, 102672.
Al-Shammari, M. A., Banerjee, S. N., & Rasheed, A. A. (2022). Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: A theory of dual responsibility. Management Decision, 60(6), 1513-1540.
Alvarez, I. G. (2012). Impact of CO2 emission variation on firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21(7), 435-454.
Anderson, R. C., Duru, A., & Reeb, D. M. (2012). Investment policy in family-controlled firms. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(6), 1744-1758.
Aouadi, A., & Marsat, S. (2018). Do ESG controversies matter for firm value? Evidence from international data. Journal of Business Ethics, 151, 1027-1047.
Asif, J., Ting, I. W. K., & Kweh, Q. L. (2020). Intellectual capital investment and firm performance of the Malaysian energy sector: a new perspective from a nonlinearity test. Energy Research Letters, 1(3).
Banerjee, S., & Homroy, S. (2018). Managerial incentives and strategic choices of firms with different ownership structures. Journal of Corporate Finance, 48, 314-330.
Caixe, D. F., Kalatzis, A. E. G., & De Castro, L. R. K. (2019). Controlling shareholders and investment-risk sensitivity in an emerging economy. Emerging Markets Review, 39, 133-153.
Cao, F., Peng, S. S., & Ye, K. (2019). Multiple large shareholders and corporate social responsibility reporting. Emerging Markets Review, 38, 287-309.
Chen, E., & Gavious, I. (2015). Does CSR have different value implications for different shareholders? Finance Research Letters, 14, 29-35.
Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. H. (2000). The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1-2), 81-112.
Connelly, B. L., Hoskisson, R. E., Tihanyi, L., & Certo, S. T. (2010). Ownership as a form of corporate governance. Journal of Management Studies, 47(8), 1561-1589.
Courteau, L., Di Pietra, R., Giudici, P., & Melis, A. (2017). The role and effect of controlling shareholders in corporate governance. Journal of Management & Governance, 21, 561-572.
Dam, L., & Scholtens, B. (2012). Does ownership type matter for corporate social responsibility? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(3), 233-252.
Epstein, M. J. (2018). Making sustainability work: Best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental and economic impacts: Berrett-Koehler.
Farooq, M., Noor, A., & Ali, S. (2022). Corporate governance and firm performance: empirical evidence from Pakistan. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 22(1), 42-66.
Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach: Cambridge university press.
Friedman, M. (1970). of Business is to Increase its Profits. New York Times Magazine, September, 13, 122-126.
Frynas, J. G., & Yamahaki, C. (2016). Corporate social responsibility: Review and roadmap of theoretical perspectives. Business ethics: A European Review, 25(3), 258-285.
Gloßner, S. (2019). Investor horizons, long-term blockholders, and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Banking & Finance, 103, 78-97.
Harjoto, M., Jo, H., & Kim, Y. (2017). Is institutional ownership related to corporate social responsibility? The nonlinear relation and its implication for stock return volatility. Journal of Business Ethics, 146, 77-109.
Hooy, G.-K., Hooy, C.-W., & Chee, H.-K. (2020). Ultimate ownership, control mechanism, and firm performance: Evidence from Malaysian firms. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 56(15), 3805-3828.
Hovey, M., Li, L., & Naughton, T. (2003). The relationship between valuation and ownership of listed firms in China. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(2), 112-122.
Hsieh, C.-H., Ting, I. W. K., Asif, J., & Le, H. T. M. (2020). The role of controlling shareholders in determining investments of intellectual capital among Taiwanese semiconductor companies. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 21(1), 62-86.
Ikram, M., Sroufe, R., Mohsin, M., Solangi, Y. A., Shah, S. Z. A., & Shahzad, F. (2020). Does CSR influence firm performance? A longitudinal study of SME sectors of Pakistan. Journal of Global Responsibility, 11(1), 27-53.
Javid, A. Y., & Iqbal, R. (2008). Ownership concentration, corporate governance and firm performance: Evidence from Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review, 643-659.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
Khan, I., Jia, M., Lei, X., Niu, R., Khan, J., & Tong, Z. (2023). Corporate social responsibility and firm performance. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 34(5-6), 672-691.
Khan, M. A. (1996). Problems and prospects of urban environmental management in Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review, 507-523.
Khwaja, M. A. (2012). Environmental challenges and constraints to policy issues for sustainable industrial development in Pakistan. Retrieved from
Kim, B.-j., Jung, J.-y., & Cho, S.-w. (2022). Can ESG mitigate the diversification discount in cross-border M&A? Borsa Istanbul Review, 22(3), 607-615.
Kong, Y., Antwi‐Adjei, A., & Bawuah, J. (2020). A systematic review of the business case for corporate social responsibility and firm performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 444-454.
Kweh, Q. L., Ting, I. W. K., Lu, W.-M., & Le, H. T. M. (2022). Nonlinearity in the relationship between intellectual capital and corporate performance: Evidence from Vietnamese listed companies. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 23(6), 1246-1275.
Kweh, Q. L., Ting, I. W. K., Ren, C., & Asif, J. (2024). How do environmental, social and governance initiatives and controversies explain the firm efficiency of Chinese energy companies? Kybernetes, In press.
Li, A., & Xia, X. (2018). Are controlling shareholders influencing the relationship between CSR and earnings quality? Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 54(5), 1047-1062.
Li, J., Haider, Z. A., Jin, X., & Yuan, W. (2019). Corporate controversy, social responsibility and market performance: International evidence. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 60, 1-18.
Liang, C. J., Huang, T. T., & Lin, W. C. (2011). Does ownership structure affect firm value? Intellectual capital across industries perspective. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12(4), 552-570.
Lim, E. (2018). Controlling shareholders and fiduciary duties in Asia. Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 18(1), 113-150.
Mishra, S., & Suar, D. (2010). Does corporate social responsibility influence firm performance of Indian companies? Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 571-601.
Oh, W.-Y., Chang, Y. K., & Jung, R. (2019). Board characteristics and corporate social responsibility: does family involvement in management matter? Journal of business research, 103, 23-33.
Pucheta‐Martínez, M. C., & Chiva‐Ortells, C. (2018). The role of directors representing institutional ownership in sustainable development through corporate social responsibility reporting. Sustainable Development, 26(6), 835-846.
Russino, A., Picone, P. M., & Dagnino, G. B. (2019). Unveiling the role of multiple blockholders: Evidence from closely held firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 27(6), 477-502.
Saeidi, S., Sofian, S., Saeidi, P., Saeidi, S., & Saaeidi, S. (2015). How does CSR contribute to firm financial performance? The mediating role of competitive advantage, reputation, and customer satisfaction. Journal of Business Research, 68(2), 341-350.
Shabbir, M. S., Aslam, E., Irshad, A., Bilal, K., Aziz, S., Abbasi, B. A., & Zia, S. (2020). Nexus between corporate social responsibility and financial and non-financial sectors’ performance: a non-linear and disaggregated approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 39164-39179.
Shapiro, D., Tang, Y., Wang, M., & Zhang, W. (2015). The effects of corporate governance and ownership on the innovation performance of Chinese SMEs. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 13(4), 311-335.
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1986). Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy, 94(3, Part 1), 461-488.
Solarino, A. M., & Boyd, B. K. (2020). Are all forms of ownership prone to tunneling? A meta‐analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 28(6), 488-501.
Sprinkle, G. B., & Maines, L. A. (2010). The benefits and costs of corporate social responsibility. Business Horizons, 53(5), 445-453.
Surroca, J., Tribó, J. A., & Waddock, S. (2010). Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5), 463-490.
Thien, N. H., Asif, J., Kweh, Q. L., & Ting, I. W. K. (2023). Firm efficiency and corporate performance: the moderating role of controlling shareholders. Benchmarking: An International Journal, In press.
Trihermanto, F., & Nainggolan, Y. A. (2020). Corporate life cycle, CSR, and dividend policy: empirical evidence of Indonesian listed firms. Social Responsibility Journal, 16(2), 159-178.
Wei, A.-P., Peng, C.-L., Huang, H.-C., & Yeh, S.-P. (2020). Effects of corporate social responsibility on firm performance: does customer satisfaction matter? Sustainability, 12(18), 7545.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
