ANALISIS FAKTOR DEMOGRAFI TERHADAP SIKAP DAN LITERASI DIGITAL DALAM KALANGAN PELAJAR SEKOLAH MENENGAH AGAMA NEGERI PAHANG
Analysis of Demographic Factors on Attitudes and Digital Literacy Among Students of State Religious Secondary Schools in Pahang
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15282/ijhtc.v10i1.12155Keywords:
Attitudes toward digital device usage, Digital literacy, Demographic factors, E-learning readiness, Sikap penggunaan peranti digital, Literasi digital, Faktor demografi, Kesediaan e-pembelajaranAbstract
This study examines the influence of demographic factors on students' attitudes toward digital device usage and their level of digital literacy among students of Sekolah Menengah Agama Negeri Pahang (SMAN). Data were collected through an online survey using a five-point Likert scale, involving 450 students from 8 SMAN schools. Statistical analysis using SPSS version 25.0 explored the relationship between demographic variables such as age, school location, and family income with both study dimensions. Findings indicate that age (14 and 16 years old), school location (rural), and family income (RM10,960 and above) have a significant relationship with attitudes toward digital devices, contributing 7.3% variance. For digital literacy, significant factors include age (14 and 16 years old) and distance from home to school (<5 km), with a contribution of 4.0%. The study highlights the importance of demographic factors in shaping students' digital literacy, providing essential implications for policymakers and educators in enhancing e-learning readiness.
Kajian ini mengkaji pengaruh faktor demografi terhadap sikap penggunaan peranti digital dan tahap literasi digital dalam kalangan pelajar Sekolah Menengah Agama Negeri Pahang (SMAN). Data dikumpulkan melalui tinjauan dalam talian menggunakan skala Likert lima mata, melibatkan 450 pelajar daripada 8 SMAN. Analisis statistik menggunakan SPSS versi 25.0 mengkaji hubungan antara pembolehubah demografi seperti usia, lokasi sekolah, dan pendapatan keluarga dengan kedua-dua dimensi kajian. Dapatan menunjukkan faktor usia (14 dan 16 tahun), lokasi sekolah (luar bandar), dan pendapatan keluarga (RM10,960 ke atas) mempunyai hubungan signifikan dengan sikap terhadap peranti digital (sumbangan varians 7.3%). Bagi literasi digital, faktor signifikan ialah usia (14 dan 16 tahun) serta jarak tempat tinggal ke sekolah (<5 km) dengan sumbangan 4.0%. Hasil kajian menekankan kepentingan faktor demografi dalam membentuk literasi digital pelajar, memberikan implikasi penting kepada pembuat dasar dan pendidik dalam meningkatkan kesediaan e-pembelajaran.
References
Arandas, M. F., Idid, S. A., & Salman, A. (2024). The influence of online distance learning and digital skills on digital literacy among university students post COVID-19. Journal of Educational Technology, 45(2), 132-148.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. https://archive.org/details/socialfoundation0000band
Bojovic, N., Stojanovic, J., & Milinkovic, D. (2020). The impact of demographic factors on the acceptance of e-learning technologies. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 23(1), 29-40. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26329542
Bonal, X., & González, S. (2020). The impact of lockdown on the learning gap: Family and school divisions in times of crisis. International Review of Education, 66(5–6), 635–655.
Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. https://archive.org/details/towardtheoryofin00brun
Davis, F. D. Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35(8). 982-1003.
Galina, I. (2020). The role of social learning environments in enhancing students’ digital literacy skills. Digital Education Review, 18(1), 55-67.
Ghazali & Hussin, Sufean. (2022). Metodologi Penyelidikan Dalam Pendidikan: Amalan dan Analisis Kajian.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2001). Rancangan Pembangunan Pendidikan 2001-2010. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2012). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia (PPPM) 2013-2025. Putrajaya. Malaysia: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi Malaysia. (2011). Pelan Tindakan Pendidikan Tinggi Fasa 2 (2011-2015). Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi Malaysia. https://planipolis.iiep.unesco.org/upload/Malaysia/Malaysia_National_Higher-_Education_Action_Plan_2011-2015.pdf
Kementerian Sains, Teknologi dan Inovasi Malaysia. (2021). Dasar Sains, Teknologi dan Inovasi Negara 2021-2030. Putrajaya: Kementerian Sains, Teknologi dan Inovasi. https://www.mosti.gov.my/en/dstin/
Kerajaan Malaysia. (2019). Wawasan Kemakmuran Bersama 2030. Putrajaya: Jabatan Perdana Menteri.
Kerajaan Malaysia. (2021). Dasar Revolusi Perindustrian Keempat (4IR) Negara. Putrajaya: Jabatan Perdana Menteri.
Kerajaan Malaysia. (2021). MyDIGITAL: Malaysia digital economy blueprint. Jabatan Perdana Menteri Malaysia. https://www.epu.gov.my/sites/default/files/2021-02/malaysia-digital-economy-blueprint.pdf
Kerajaan Negeri Pahang. (2021). Pelan Digital Pahang 2021-2025. Kuantan: Kerajaan Negeri Pahang.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. 1970. Determining, Sample Size for Research Activities, Education and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610
Lin, F. Y., Chou, C. C., & Chen, Y. C. (2024). Enhancing digital literacy through problem-based learning in technology-integrated classrooms. Computers & Education, 99, 112-123.
Pertubuhan Bangsa-Bangsa Bersatu. (2018). Technology and education: A pathway to sustainable development. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).
Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. New York: Orion Press. https://archive.org/details/scienceofeducati00piag
Ramírez-Correa, P. E., Arenas-Gaitán, J., & Rondán-Cataluña, F. J. (2015). Gender and acceptance of e-learning: A multi-group analysis based on a structural equation model among college students in Chile and Spain. PLOS ONE, 10(10), e0140460.
Saputra, R., & Gürbüz, M. C. (2021). Analisis penerimaan teknologi dompet elektronik GoPay menggunakan pendekatan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer, 8(2), 245–256.
Setiawati, E., Siahaan, H., & Hasanah, U. (2022). Digital literacy and generational differences in micro and small enterprises. Journal of Business and Technology, 8(1), 45-60.
Solahudin, M., Nor, A. A., & Ibrahim, H. (2022). Digital social support and its effect on digital literacy among high school students. Journal of Educational Research, 31(3), 204-212.
Suruhanjaya Komunikasi dan Multimedia Malaysia. (2020). Pelan Jalinan Digital Negara (JENDELA). https://myjendela.my/
Syed Lamsah, S. C., & Mohamad Yusoff, M. N. (2020). Bridging the digital divide: The impact of digital literacy on students’ academic performance. International Journal of Educational Technology, 16(2), 74-89.
van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2019). The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access. New Media & Society, 21(2), 354–375.
van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2017). The digital divide: Causes, effects, and solutions. SAGE Publications.
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273-315.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvjf9vz4
Zhang, J. (2023). EFL teachers’ digital literacy: The role of contextual factors in their literacy development. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1153339.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
