Application of Affine Projective Transformation in Cadastre Data Migration in Peninsular Malaysia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15282/construction.v5i1.11679Keywords:
Affine Transformation, Cassini Geocentric, Cassini Soldner, Digital Cadastre Database, Geocentric Datum Malaysia 2000 (GDM2000)Abstract
Digital Cadastral Database (DCDB) is emerging as a comprehensive system that offers enhanced accuracy, compatibility and functionality in land surveying practices. The modernisation of land surveying practices has brought about a crucial need to upgrade the existing spatial database to the DCDB in the Geodetic Datum of Malaysia 2000 (GDM2000). This study is aimed to investigate the cadastre data migration process in Peninsular Malaysia. A case study focused on the state of Johor with few cadastre parcels analysed during the study period. The methodology of the study consisted of gathering the PDUK data, including land surveys, property boundaries, and related records as well as acquiring DCDB data and transformation parameters. Next, the data was analysed by evaluating the quality of PDUK data and identifying the inconsistencies, errors and gaps, then analysing the existing migration process to the DCDB. Afterwards, Affine transformation was implemented where the migration of PDUK data to DCDB needs to be conducted by considering the geometric properties of the parcels. This established the relationship between the old and new datums. Subsequently, pre-migration and post-migration datasets were compared in terms of accuracy and consistency with the parcels area different obtained are below 50 cm2. From the comparison result, recommendations for the improvement of the migration process, including adjustments to the fitting method were obtained. The findings offer valuable insights into the migration of PDUK data to DCDB for land surveying practices in the Malaysian Peninsular.
Downloads
References
[1] S. H. Jaafar, “Kajian keberkesanan kualiti pangkalan data ukur kadaster berdigit kebangsaan (NDCDB) mengikut perspektif pengguna,” PhD dissertation, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 2015.
[2] G. Mariappan, “Isu-isu pengintegrasian pangkalan data ukur kadaster dan sistem pendaftaran tanah berkomputer,” PhD dissertation, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 2006.
[3] N. M. Hashim, A. H. Omar, K. M. Omar, N. M. Abdullah, and M. H. M. Yatim, “Cadastral positioning accuracy improvement: A case study in Malaysia,” The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. 42, pp. 265-270, 2016.
[4] A. M. Kadir and A. H. Omar, “Ke arah pembentukan pangkalan data kadastra berdigit kebangsaan: Sistem penukaran pangkalan data automatik,” in Seminar Geoinformasi 2001, Pulau Pinang, 2001.
[5] M. Mohd Yusoff and N. Abdul Halim. “Unleashing the full potential of ekadaster on the cadastral system of Malaysia,” in Nineteenth United Nations Regional Cartographic Conference for Asia and the Pacific Bangkok, 29 October–1 November 2012.
[6] X. Luo, R. Bennett, M. Koeva, C. Lemmen, and N. Quadros, “Quantifying the overlap between cadastral and visual boundaries: A case study from Vanuatu,” Urban Science, vol. 1, no. 4, p. 32, 2017.
[7] J. Zevenbergen and C. Augustinus. “Designing a pro poor land recordation system,” in Proceedings of the FIG Working Week, pp. 18-22, 2011.
[8] R. Bennett, A. Rajabifard, M. Kalantari, J. Wallace, and I. Williamson, “Cadastral futures: Building a new vision for the nature and role of cadastres,” in FIG Congress, pp. 11-16, 2010.
[9] M. Buuveibaatar, K. Lee, and W. Lee, “Implementation of the LADM-Based Cadastral Model for Mongolia towards Transition to a 3D Cadastre,” Land, vol. 11, no. 11, p. 2014, 2022.
[10] S. Enemark, K. C. Bell, C. Lemmen, and R. McLaren, Fit-for-purpose land administration. International Federation of Surveyors, 2014.
[11] M. Čeh, F. Gielsdorf, B. Trobec, M. Krivic, A. Lisec, “Improving the positional accuracy of traditional cadastral index maps with membrane adjustment in Slovenia,” ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, vol. 8, no. 8, p. 338, 2019.
[12] B. Fetai, J. Tekavec, M. K. Fras, and A. Lisec, “Inconsistencies in cadastral boundary data—digitisation and maintenance,” Land, vol. 11, no. 12, p. 2318, 2022.
[13] N. Z. Abdul Halim, S. A. Sulaiman, K. Talib, and Z. A. Majeed, “Investigating the national digital cadastral database (NDCDB) data handling within GIS applications,” The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. 42, pp. 3-10, 2018.
[14] G. Blick, C. Crook, D. Grant, and J. Beavan, “Implementation of a semi-dynamic datum for New Zealand,” in A Window on the Future of Geodesy: Proceedings of the International Association of Geodesy IAG General Assembly, Sapporo, Japan June 30–July 11, pp. 38-43, 2003.
[15] T. Tomoo, H. Hirai, T. Kawaguchi, S. Matsuzaka, Y. Hatanaka, M. Tobita, et al., “Efficient maintenance of the Japanese Geodetic Datum 2000 using crustal deformation models–PatchJGD & Semi-Dynamic Datum-Yoshiyuki Tanaka, Hiroaki Saita, Jun Sugawara, Kazumi Iwata,” Bulletin of the Geographical Survey Institute, vol. 52, p. 49, 2005.
[16] P. Banerjee, F. Pollitz, B. Nagarajan, and R. Bürgmann, “Coseismic slip distributions of the 26 December 2004 Sumatra–Andaman and 28 March 2005 Nias earthquakes from GPS static offsets,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol. 97, no. 1A, pp. S86-S102, 2007.
[17] W. J. F. Simons, A. Socquet, C. Vigny, B. A. C. Ambrosius, S. Haji Abu, C. Promthong, et al., “A decade of GPS in Southeast Asia: Resolving Sundaland motion and boundaries,” Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, vol. 112, no. B6, 2007.
[18] N. J. Jaffar, T. A. Musa, and W. A. W. Aris, “Assessment of geocentric datum of Malaysia 2000 (GDM2000),” The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. 42, p. 271-276, 2019.
[19] M. Azhari, Z. Altamimi, G. Azman, M. Kadir, W. J. F. Simons, R. Sohaime, et al., “Semi-kinematic geodetic reference frame based on the ITRF2014 for Malaysia,” Journal of Geodetic Science, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 91-109, 2020.
[20] Y. Sisman, “Coordinate transformation of cadastral maps using different adjustment methods,” Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 869-882, 2014.
[21] J. Gill, N. S. Shariff, K. M. Omar, A. H. M. Din, and Z. M. Amin, “Development of a time-dependent 3-parameter helmert datum transformation model: a case study for Malaysia,” The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. 42, pp. 181-189, 2016.
[22] N. S. M. Shariff, T. A. Musa, K. Omar, and R. Othman, “The geocentric datum of Malaysia: preliminary assessment and implications,” Geoinformation for Informed Decisions, pp. 71-83, 2014.
[23] M. Rabah, M. Elmewafey, and M. H. Farahan, “Datum maintenance of the main Egyptian geodetic control networks by utilizing Precise Point Positioning “PPP” technique,” NRIAG Journal of Astronomy and Geophysics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 96-105, 2016.
[24] Ronen, H. and G. Even-Tzur, “Kinematic datum based on the ITRF as a precise, accurate, and lasting TRF for Israel,” Journal of Surveying Engineering, vol. 143, no. 4, p. 04017013, 2017.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
