Comparison of different additive manufacturing patterns on the performance of rapid vacuum casting for mating parts via the Taguchi method

Authors

  • Nur Nabilah Mohd Mustafa School of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, 81310 Johor Bahru, Johor, MALAYSIA Phone: +6075534564; Fax: +605566159.
  • Aini Zuhra Abdul Kadir School of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, 81310 Johor Bahru, Johor, MALAYSIA Phone: +6075534564; Fax: +605566159.
  • N. H. Akhmal Ngadiman School of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, 81310 Johor Bahru, Johor, MALAYSIA Phone: +6075534564; Fax: +605566159.
  • A. Ma'aram School of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, 81310 Johor Bahru, Johor, MALAYSIA Phone: +6075534564; Fax: +605566159.
  • K. Zakaria School of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, 81310 Johor Bahru, Johor, MALAYSIA Phone: +6075534564; Fax: +605566159.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15282/jmes.14.1.2020.17.0502

Keywords:

rapid casting, additive manufacturing, vacuum casting, batch production

Abstract

Rapid vacuum casting has been proven to be a successful method in producing high-quality parts in small series. However, a challenge lies in the selection of proper Additive Manufacturing (AM) technologies for the development of a master pattern for the vacuum casting process. Each AM technologies differ from one another in terms of dimensional accuracy, surface finish, cost and lead times. The aim of this study is to investigate the performance of casting mating parts based on different additive manufacturing patterns for small batch. Three types of AM-based patterns: Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM), Stereolithography (SLA) and Multi-Jet Fusion (MJF) were compared. The Taguchi method, Signal to Noise ratio (S/N), Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and T-test were conducted in determining the optimized parameters. From the findings, curing time is shown to be a significant parameter for dimensional accuracy and surface finish. Dimensional deviation varies in different directions of parts. For surface finish, there was only a slight change from the master pattern whereas the surface roughness of casting parts decreased within the range 0.23% to 2.85%. Tolerance grades for the selected dimensions of the parts were in the permissible range, based on ISO286-1:2010. When using distinct kinds of AM patterns to create replacement components, design tolerance is needed. It was suggested to select AM technology similar to that had been used for the original components.  Battery cover was selected as a case study to represent the mating application parts.

References

Ramos AM, Relvas C, Simo˜es JA. Vacuum casting with room temperature vulcanising rubber and aluminium moulds for rapid manufacturing of quality parts: a comparative study. Rapid Prototyping Journal. 2003;9(2):111-5.

Zhu Z, Pradel P, Bibb RJ, Moultrie J. Economic analysis of plastic additive manufacturing for production of end use products: a preliminary study. Rapid Design, Prototyping & Manufacturing 2017.

Pal D, Ravi B. Rapid tooling route selection and evaluation for sand and investment casting. Virtual and Physical Prototyping. 2007;2(4):197-207.

Wohlers T, Gornet T. History of additive manufacturing. Wohlers report. 2014;24(2014):118.

Maidin S, Yi T, Hambali A, Akmal S, Hambali R, Abdullah Z. Investigation of optimum gating system design of fused deposition modelling pattern for sand casting. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences. 2017;11(3):2801-14.

Šljivić M, Kraišnik M, Ilić J, Anić J. Development of Small Batches of Functional Parts Using Integration of 3D Printing and Vacuum Casting Technology. Acta Technica Corvininesis-Bulletin of Engineering. 2018;11(2).

Singh J, Bagde P, Soni S, Verma JK, Kalyan K. Investigations on dimensional accuracy and surface finish of polyurethane replicas fabricated by silicon molding process for rapid casting applications. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology. 2017;8(7):1676-83.

Singh J, Singh R, Singh H. Experimental investigations for dimensional accuracy and surface finish of polyurethane prototypes fabricated by indirect rapid tooling: a case study. Progress in Additive Manufacturing. 2017;2(1-2):85-97.

Guo H, Zhou YT. The CAE Analysis for Thin-Walled Plastic Parts Vacuum Casting. Advanced Materials Research. 2014;889-890:52-7.

Puerta APV, Sanchez DM, Batista M, Salguero J. Criteria selection for a comparative study of functional performance of Fused Deposition Modelling and Vacuum Casting processes. Journal of Manufacturing Processes. 2018; 35:721-7.

Zamani J, Hemati M, Morsaluie R. An experimental comparison on dimensional accuracy of wax patterns of gas turbine blades produced by rapid tooling. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering. 2014;39(10):7289-97.

Iftikhar A, Khan M, Alam K, Imran Jaffery SH, Ali L, Ayaz Y, et al. Turbine blade manufacturing through rapid tooling (RT) process and its quality inspection. Materials and Manufacturing Processes. 2013;28(5):534-8.

Budzik G, Markowski T, Sobolak M. Hybrid foundry patterns of bevel gears. Archives of Foundry Engineering. 2007;7(1):131-4.

Sever-Adrian R, Frăţilă D-F. Simulation and Experimental Research on the Vacuum Casting of Non-Metallic Complex Parts Using Flexible Molds.

Vosniakos G-C, Michael S, Vasileiou A. Digital Manufacturing Process Chain for One-Off Replacement Parts: A Precision Casting Case Study. Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing. 2017;1(2):17.

Ahmad MN, Alkahari MR, Basir MFM, Maidin NA, Wahid MK, Ab Rahman MH. Optimization of vacuum casting process parameters using Taguchi method. Proceedings of Mechanical Engineering Research Day 2018; 2018.

Chang DY, Deng CS. Process Parameter Experiments on Vacuum Casting Using a Silicone Rubber Mold for ABS Plastic Parts. Advanced Materials Research. 2011;201-203:1668-71.

Aggenbacht FC. Development and Evaluation of a Vacuum Casting Process

Tang Y, Tan WK, Fuh JYH, Loh HT, Wong YS, Thian SCH, et al. Micro-mould fabrication for a micro-gear via vacuum casting. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2007;192-193:334-9.

Sabdin S, Hussein N, Sued M, Ayob M, Rahim M, Fadzil M. Effects of ColdArc welding parameters on the tensile strengths of high strength steel plate investigated using the Taguchi approach. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences. 2019;13(2):4846-56.

Griffiths B. 5 - Limits, Fits and Geometrical Tolerancing. In: Griffiths B, editor. Engineering Drawing for Manufacture. London: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2003. p. 88-110.

Bassoli E, Gatto A, Iuliano L, Grazia Violante M. 3D printing technique applied to rapid casting. Rapid Prototyping Journal. 2007;13(3):148-55.

Minetola P, Iuliano L, Marchiandi G. Benchmarking of FDM machines through part quality using IT grades. Procedia CIRP. 2016; 41:1027-32.

Ali MY, Banu A, Salehan M, Adesta EY, Hazza M, Shaffiq M. Dimensional accuracy in dry micro wire electrical discharge machining. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences. 2018;12(1):3321-9.

Downloads

Published

2020-03-23

How to Cite

[1]
N. N. Mohd Mustafa, A. Z. Abdul Kadir, N. H. A. Ngadiman, A. Ma’aram, and K. Zakaria, “Comparison of different additive manufacturing patterns on the performance of rapid vacuum casting for mating parts via the Taguchi method”, J. Mech. Eng. Sci., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 6417–6429, Mar. 2020.