Large eddy simulation of wind flow through an urban environment in its full-scale wind tunnel models

E. Reda; Rozli Zulkifli; Z. Harun

doi:10.15282/jmes.11.2.2017.9.0243

Authors

E. Reda Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, UKM Bangi, 43600, Selangor, Malaysia
Rozli Zulkifli Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, UKM Bangi, 43600, Selangor, Malaysia
Z. Harun Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, UKM Bangi, 43600, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15282/jmes.11.2.2017.9.0243

Keywords:

Dynamic similarity; LES; Atmospheric flow; turbulence; Wind tunnel model; full-scale model.

Abstract

Wind flow through urban areas is studied either by wind tunnel scale experiments or via computational fluid dynamics simulations through full-scale actual models. The large difference between the Reynolds numbers based on the geometries of actual cities and wind tunnel scale cities makes the dynamic similarity between the two models uncertain. In this study, the mean and turbulent flow parameters were investigated using a large eddy simulation for two models i.e. the actual urban area model and the wind tunnel scale (1:1000) model. Kuala Lumpur City Centre, Malaysia, was considered as the case study of an urban area. Vertical velocity profiles were plotted at five locations representing different building packing densities. The results of wind tunnel scale model largely agreed with the actual model with some discrepancies in the building vicinity and wakes. The dissimilarity of the wake patterns due to the large difference in Re was responsible for the deviations. Largest discrepancies were found in the lateral and wall-normal velocity components and turbulence stresses. The results casted a shadow on the applicability of the conclusions derived from the simulations on wind tunnel scale models to the actual urban environments they represented. The deviation between the two models should be assessed before proceeding with experimental or numerical simulations on small-sized models.

References

Muhsin F, Yusoff WFM, Mohamed MF, Sapian AR. Cfd modeling of natural ventilation in a void connected to the living units of multi-storey housing for thermal comfort. Energy and Buildings. 2017;144:1-16.

Akeiber H, Nejat P, Majid MZA, Wahid MA, Jomehzadeh F, Famileh IZ, et al. A review on phase change material (pcm) for sustainable passive cooling in building envelopes. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2016;60:1470-97.

Rahman MAA, Thiagarajan KP. Experiments on vortex-induced vibration of a vertical cylindrical structure: Effect of low aspect ratio. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering. 2015;11:2515-.

Al-Faruk A, Sharifian AS. Effects of flow parameters on the performance of vertical axis swirling type savonius wind turbine. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering. 2015;12:2929-43.

Wahhad AM, Adam NM, Sapuan SM. Comparison of numerical simulation and experimental study on indoor air quality of air-conditioned office building in desert climate. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering. 2015;12:3109-24.

Rasani MR, Aldlemy MS, Harun Z. Fluid-structure interaction analysis of rear spoiler vibration for energy harvesting potential. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences. 2017;14:2415-27.

Tahseen TA, Ishak M, Rahman MM. Laminar forced convection heat transfer over staggered circular tube banks: A CFD approach. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences. 2013;4:418-30.

Tahseen TA, Ishak M, Rahman MM. A numerical study of forced convection heat transfer over a series of flat tubes between parallel plates. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences. 2012;3:271-80.

Gousseau P, Blocken B, Stathopoulos T, Van Heijst GJF. Cfd simulation of near-field pollutant dispersion on a high-resolution grid: A case study by les and rans for a building group in downtown montreal. Atmospheric Environment. 2011;45:428-38.

Sun L, Nottrott A, Kleissl J. Effect of hilly urban morphology on dispersion in the urban boundary layer. Building and Environment. 2012;48:195-205.

Yuan R, Wu X, Luo T, Liu H, Sun J. A review of water tank modeling of the convective atmospheric boundary layer. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2011;99:1099-114.

Tahseen TA, Rahman MM, Ishak M. Effect of tube spacing, fin density and reynolds number on overall heat transfer rate for in-line configuration. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering. 2015;12:3065-75.

Townsend AA. The structure of turbulent shear flow: Cambridge university press; 1956.

Golden J. Scale model techniques. 1961.

Snyder WH. Guideline for fluid modeling of atmospheric diffusion: Environmental Sciences Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency; 1981.

Halitsky J. Gas diffusion near buildings ch. 5-5 of meteorology and atomic energy. US Atomic Energy Commission TID-24190 Oak Ridge; 1968. p. 221-55.

Castro IP, Robins AG. The flow around a surface-mounted cube in uniform and turbulent streams. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 1977;79:307-35.

Fackrell JE, Pearce JE. Parameters affecting dispersion in the near wake of buildings. Central Electricity Generating Board. 1981.

Ricci A, Kalkman I, Blocken B, Burlando M, Freda A, Repetto MP. Impact of model parameters on 3d-steady state rans simulations of urban wind flow: The case study of livorno city. XIV Conference of the Italian Association for Wind Engineering; 2016.

Jedrzejewski M, Pocwierz M, Zielonko-Jung K. The problem of airflow around building clusters in different configurations. Archive of Mechanical Engineering. 2017;64:401-18.

Ramponi R, Blocken B. Cfd simulation of cross-ventilation flow for different isolated building configurations: Validation with wind tunnel measurements and analysis of physical and numerical diffusion effects. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2012;104:408-18.

Kikumoto H, Ooka R. A numerical study of air pollutant dispersion with bimolecular chemical reactions in an urban street canyon using large-eddy simulation. Atmospheric Environment. 2012;54:456-64.

Liu YS, Miao SG, Zhang CL, Cui GX, Zhang ZS. Study on micro-atmospheric environment by coupling large eddy simulation with mesoscale model. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2012;107:106-17.

Liu J, Srebric J, Yu N. Numerical simulation of convective heat transfer coefficients at the external surfaces of building arrays immersed in a turbulent boundary layer. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2013;61:209-25.

Wyszogrodzki AA, Miao S, Chen F. Evaluation of the coupling between mesoscale-wrf and les-eulag models for simulating fine-scale urban dispersion. Atmospheric Research. 2012;118:324-45.

Stull RB. An introduction to boundary layer meteorology: Springer Science & Business Media; 1988.

Meneveau C, Lund TS, Cabot WH. A lagrangian dynamic subgrid-scale model of turbulence. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 1996;319:353-85.

Flores F, Garreaud R, Muñoz RC. Cfd simulations of turbulent buoyant atmospheric flows over complex geometry: Solver development in openfoam. Computers and Fluids. 2013;82:1-13.

Moonen P, Dorer V, Carmeliet J. Effect of flow unsteadiness on the mean wind flow pattern in an idealized urban environment. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2012;104:389-96.

Zhou B, Chow FK. Turbulence modeling for the stable atmospheric boundary layer and implications for wind energy. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion. 2012;88:255-77.

Pieterse JE, Harms TM. Cfd investigation of the atmospheric boundary layer under different thermal stability conditions. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2013;121:82-97.

Qu Y, Milliez M, Musson-Genon L, Carissimo B. Numerical study of the thermal effects of buildings on low-speed airflow taking into account 3d atmospheric radiation in urban canopy. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 2012;104:474-83.

Kastner-Klein P, Rotach MW. Mean flow and turbulence characteristics in an urban roughness sublayer. Boundary-Layer Meteorology. 2004;111:55-84.

Franke J, Hellsten A, Schlünzen H, Carissimo B. Best practice guideline for the cfd simulation of flows in the urban environment. Quality Assurance And Improvement of Microscale Meteorological Models ; 2007.

Latif MT, Dominick D, Ahamad F, Khan MF, Juneng L, Hamzah FM, et al. Long term assessment of air quality from a background station on the malaysian peninsula. Science of the total environment. 2014;482:336-48.

Harun Z, Reda E, Zulkifli R. Buoyancy effect on atmospheric surface layer: Measurements from the east coast of malaysia. The 15th Asian Congress of Fluid Mechanics; 2016.

Issa RI. Solution of the implicitly discretised fluid flow equations by operator-splitting. Journal of Computational Physics. 1986;62:40-65.

Aristodemou E, Bentham T, Pain C, Colvile R, Robins A, ApSimon H. A comparison of mesh-adaptive les with wind tunnel data for flow past buildings: Mean flows and velocity fluctuations. Atmospheric Environment. 2009;43:6238-53.

Rusdin A. Computation of turbulent flow around a square block with standard and modified k-ε turbulence models. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering. 2017;14:3938-53.

Xie Z-T, Castro IP. Large-eddy simulation for flow and dispersion in urban streets. Atmospheric Environment. 2009;43:2174-85.

Gu Z-L, Zhang Y-W, Cheng Y, Lee S-C. Effect of uneven building layout on air flow and pollutant dispersion in non-uniform street canyons. Building and Environment. 2011;46:2657-65.

Zaki SA, Hagishima A, Tanimoto J, Ikegaya N. Aerodynamic parameters of urban building arrays with random geometries. Boundary-Layer Meteorology. 2011;138:99-120.

Rotach MW. Profiles of turbulence statistics in and above an urban street canyon. Atmospheric Environment. 1995;29:1473-86.

Hutchins N, Chauhan K, Marusic I, Monty J, Klewicki J. Towards reconciling the large-scale structure of turbulent boundary layers in the atmosphere and laboratory. Boundary-Layer Meteorology. 2012;145:273-306.