Insights into hydrogen bubble dynamics and electrochemical performance on flat and electrochemically etched stainless steel electrodes using high-speed imaging
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15282/jmes.19.4.2025.2.0850Keywords:
Electrochemically etched electrode, H2 bubbles dynamics, High-speed camera analysis, Stainless steelAbstract
Gas bubbles formed on electrodes during electrochemical processes increase overpotential and ohmic voltage drop, leading to higher energy consumption in water electrolysis. This study investigates the effect of surface roughness on hydrogen bubble dynamics and hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) performance using flat and electrochemically etched SS-316L working electrodes. Electrochemical experiments were conducted at room temperature in a three-compartment acrylic cell using a potentiostat. The SS-316L electrodes served as the working electrode (WE), with platinum and Ag/AgCl wires functioning as the counter and reference electrodes in 0.5 M KOH electrolyte. The etched electrode was prepared through electrochemical etching in a freshly prepared dilute Aqua Regia solution, followed by ultrasonic cleaning and drying. Bubble evolution was recorded using a high-speed visualization system. Results reveal that the etched electrode exhibits smaller bubble detachment radii (average 162 μm vs. 248 μm), shorter growth time (5.8 s vs. 9.2 s), and lower voltage fluctuations than the flat electrode, indicating improved bubble release dynamics. Enhanced surface roughness promotes higher HER activity, with the etched electrode showing a reduced onset potential of 0.43 V (0.11 V lower than flat WE), decreased overpotential from 331.4 to 247.8 mV at 10 mA cm-2, and a lower charge transfer resistance (67.2 Ω vs. 234.3 Ω). The double-layer capacitance increases from 0.38 to 0.91 mF cm-2, confirming a larger electrochemically active surface area. The etched electrode also demonstrates superior stability, maintaining consistent polarization behaviour after 500 CV cycles at 100 mV s-1.
References
[1] W. U. Mulk, S. A. Ali, S. N. Shah, M. U. H. Shah, Q. J. Zhang, M. Younas, et al., “Breaking boundaries in CO₂ capture: Ionic liquid-based membrane separation for post-combustion applications,” Journal of CO₂ Utilization, vol. 75, p. 102555, 2023.
[2] M. A. Ismael, I. R. Silmyi, W. U. Mulk, M. El-Adawy, A. R. A. Aziz, M. E. Babiker, “The role of nanoparticles in combustion improvement: Performance and emission analysis of a DI diesel engine fuelled with water-in-biodiesel emulsions enhanced by mono and hybrid nanoparticles,” Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 274, p. 126755, 2025.
[3] W. U. Mulk, M. A. Ismael, A. R. A. Aziz, M. Azman, M. Aider, M. Younas, et al., “Recent progress in biodiesel-fueled ICEs and role of nano-additives in optimizing combustion and emissions with cost analysis: A comprehensive review,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 226, p. 116263, 2026.
[4] C. McGregor, B. D. Young, and D. Hildebrandt, “Risk assessment framework for green hydrogen megaprojects: Balancing climate goals with project viability,” Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 262, P. 125197, 2025.
[5] M. A. Ismael, C. S. Maung, A. R. A. Aziz, W. U. Mulk, W. B. Ayandotun, I. Veza, et al., “Ammonia as a hydrogen carrier in dual-fuel diesel engines: Influence of ammonia and oxygen on combustion performance and emissions,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 165, p. 150586, 2025.
[6] Y. Wang, B. Su, X. Yang, Z. Chen, and S. Wang, “A green hydrogen production system based on solar-assisted biogas steam reforming,” Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 248, p. 123067, 2024.
[7] W. U. Mulk, A. R. Abd Aziz, M. A. Ismael, and A. A. Ghoto, “Diesel and oxyhydrogen dual-fuel: Reducing emissions of a diesel engine using diesel–oxyhydrogen dual-fuel combustion,” Journal of Advanced Research in Experimental Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 69–80, 2025.
[8] E. M. A. Mokheimer, M. R. Shakeel, A. Harale, S. Paglieri, and R. B. Mansour, “Fuel reforming processes for hydrogen production,” Fuel, vol. 359, p. 130427, 2024.
[9] L. Jin, R. N. Nakashima, G. Comodi, H. L. Frandsen, “Alkaline electrolysis for green hydrogen production: A novel, simple model for thermo-electrochemical coupled system analysis,” Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 262, p. 125154, 2025.
[10] W. U. Mulk, A. R. A. Aziz, M. A. Ismael, A. A. Ghoto, S. A. Ali, M. Younas, et al., “Electrochemical hydrogen production through anion exchange membrane water electrolysis (AEMWE): Recent progress and associated challenges in hydrogen production,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 94, pp. 1174–1211, 2024.
[11] W. Zhang, Y. Chen, Z. Ma, Z. Sun, J. Wang, J. Feng. et al., “Challenges and strategies of transition metal phosphides applied in oxygen evolution reaction of electrocatalytic water splitting: A review,” Fuel, vol. 369, p. 131741, 2024.
[12] J. Zhu, X. Zhang, P. Lv, Y. Wang, and J. Wang, “An experimental investigation of convective mass transfer characterization in two configurations of electrolysers,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 43, no. 18, pp. 8632–8643, 2018.
[13] Y.-H. Li and Y.-J. Chen, “The effect of magnetic field on the dynamics of gas bubbles in water electrolysis,” Scientific Reports, vol. 11, no. 1, P. 9346, 2021.
[14] K. M. Cho, P. R. Deshmukh, and W. G. Shin, “Hydrodynamic behavior of bubbles at gas-evolving electrode in ultrasonic field during water electrolysis,” Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, vol. 80, P. 105796, 2021.
[15] Y. Yu, Y. Zhong, M. Wang, and Z. Guo, “Electrochemical behavior of aluminium anode in super-gravity field and its application in copper removal from wastewater by electrocoagulation,” Chemosphere, vol. 272, P. 129614, 2021.
[16] K. Khowamnuaychok, C. Luangchaisri, and C. Muangphat, “Effect of surface curvature and wettability on the shape of nanobubble and hollow structure of gold nanoparticles,” Surfaces and Interfaces, vol. 60, P. 106045, 2025.
[17] J. Shen, J. Li, B. Li, Y. Zheng, X. Bao, J. Guo, et al., “Ambient fast synthesis of superaerophobic/superhydrophilic electrode for superior electrocatalytic water oxidation,” Energy & Environmental Materials, vol. 6, no. 6, p. e12462, 2023.
[18] X. Qin, B. Yan, D. Kim, Z. Teng, T. Chen, J. Choi, et al., “Interfacial engineering and hydrophilic/aerophobic tuning of Sn4P3/Co2P heterojunction nanoarrays for high-efficiency fully reversible water electrolysis,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 304, p. 120923, 2022.
[19] S. Chang, Y. Zhang, B. Zhang, X. Cao, L. Zhang, X. Huang, et al., “Conductivity modulation of 3D-printed shellular electrodes through embedding nanocrystalline intermetallics into amorphous matrix for ultrahigh-current oxygen evolution,” Advanced Energy Materials, vol. 11, no. 28, p. 2100968, 2021.
[20] K. Ge, Y. Zeng, G. Dong, L. Zhao, Z. Wang, and M. Huang, “3D self-standing grass-like cobalt phosphide vesicles-decorated nanocones grown on Ni-foam as an efficient electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 44, no. 26, pp. 13490–13501, 2019.
[21] E. Hatami, A. Toghraei, and G. Barati Darband, “Electrodeposition of Ni–Fe micro/nano urchin-like structure as an efficient electrocatalyst for overall water splitting,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 46, no. 14, pp. 9394–9405, 2021.
[22] Y. Li, H. Zhang, T. Xu, Z. Lu, X. Wu, P. Wan, et al., “Under-water superaerophobic pine-shaped Pt nanoarray electrode for ultrahigh-performance hydrogen evolution,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 1737–1744, 2015.
[23] D. Kim, X. Qin, B. Yan, Y. Piao, “Sprout-shaped Mo-doped CoP with maximized hydrophilicity and gas bubble release for high-performance water splitting catalyst,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 408, p. 127331, 2021.
[24] X. Wang, X. Xia, H. Wang, Y. Yang, S. Yang, A. Zhang, et al., “Special-wettability-mediating electrode interfaces for new energy devices: Opportunities and challenges,” Nano Energy, vol. 120, p. 109185, 2024.
[25] Y. Yu, P. Liu, M. Dou, J. Niu, Z. Zhang, F. Wang, “Promotion of hydrogen evolution catalysis by ordered hierarchically porous electrodes,” Catalysis Science & Technology, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 2997–3001, 2021.
[26] F. Wang, Y. Wu, B. Dong, K. Lv, Y. Shi, N. Ke, et al., “Robust porous WC-based self-supported ceramic electrodes for high current density hydrogen evolution reaction,” Advanced Science, vol. 9, no. 15, p. 2106029, 2022.
[27] W. Song, M. Xu, X. Teng, Y. Niu, S. Gong, X. Liu, et al., “Construction of self-supporting, hierarchically structured caterpillar-like NiCo₂S₄ arrays as an efficient trifunctional electrocatalyst for water and urea electrolysis,” Nanoscale, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1680–1688, 2021.
[28] A. Z. Alhakemy, A. B. A. A. Nassr, A. E.-H. Kashyout, Z. Wen, “Modifying the 316L stainless steel surface by an electrodeposition technique: Towards high-performance electrodes for alkaline water electrolysis,” Sustainable Energy & Fuels, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 1382–1397, 2022.
[29] U. K. Sultana, J. F. S. Fernando, A. P. O’Mullane, “Transformation of stainless steel 316 into a bifunctional water splitting electrocatalyst tolerant to polarity switching,” Sustainable Materials and Technologies, vol. 25, P. e00177, 2020.
[30] M. J. Lavorante, J. I. Franco, “Performance of stainless steel 316L electrodes with modified surface to be use in alkaline water electrolyzers,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 41, no. 23, pp. 9731–9737, 2016.
[31] K. Zeng, D. Zhang, “Evaluating the effect of surface modifications on Ni based electrodes for alkaline water electrolysis,” Fuel, vol. 116, pp. 692–698, 2014.
[32] T. Zhou, H. Gao, Y. Hu, W. Huang, F. Yang, W. Sun, et al., “Activation stainless steel with electrochemical etching-hydrothermal as an efficient and stable alkaline water oxidation electrode,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 577, p. 233241, 2023.
[33] H. Y. Cai, J. F. Ma, N. N. Li, W. P. Li, S. P. Li, M. X. Qiu, et al., “Investigation on hydrogen evolution reaction performance of porous electrode prepared by laser powder bed fusion,” Renewable Energy, vol. 185, pp. 771–778, 2022.
[34] X. Lyu, J. Li, C. J. Jafta, Y. Bai, C. P. Canales, F. Magnus, et al., “Investigation of oxygen evolution reaction with Ni foam and stainless-steel mesh electrodes in alkaline seawater electrolysis,” Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, vol. 10, no. 5, p. 108486, 2022.
[35] C. Lee, A. Kim, J. Kim, “Electrochemically etched porous stainless steel for enhanced oil retention,” Surface and Coatings Technology, vol. 264, pp. 127–131, 2015.
[36] A. Dehane, S. Merouani, O. Hamdaoui, A. Alghyamah, “A complete analysis of the effects of transfer phenomena and reaction heats on sono-hydrogen production from reacting bubbles: Impact of ambient bubble size,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 46, no. 36, pp. 18767–18779, 2021.
[37] Y. Kameya, R. Hasegawa, and T. Osawa, “Hydrogen bubble management in planarly confined aqueous electrolyte: Fundamental factors for scale-up reactor design,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 139, pp. 963–970, 2025.
[38] A. Raman, P. Peñas, D. van der Meer, D. Lohse, H. Gardeniers, D. Fernández Rivas, “Potential response of single successive constant-current-driven electrolytic hydrogen bubbles spatially separated from the electrode,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 425, p. 140691, 2022.
[39] P. van der Linde, A Moreno Soto, P Peñas-López, J. R.-Rodríguez, D. Lohse, H. Gardeniers, et al., “Electrolysis-driven and pressure-controlled diffusive growth of successive bubbles on microstructured surfaces,” Langmuir, vol. 33, no. 45, pp. 12873–12886, 2017.
[40] A. Raman, C. C. dos Santos Porto, H. Gardeniers, C. Soares, D. F. Rivas, N. Padoin, “Investigating mass transfer around spatially-decoupled electrolytic bubbles,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 477, p. 147012, 2023.
[41] D. Fernández, P. Maurer, M. Martine, J. M. D. Coey, and M. E. Möbius, “Bubble formation at a gas-evolving microelectrode,” Langmuir, vol. 30, no. 43, pp. 13065–13074, 2014.
[42] Y. Wang, M. E. Zaytsev, H. L. The, J. C. T. Eijkel, H. J. W. Zandvliet, X. Zhang, et al., “Vapor and gas-bubble growth dynamics around laser-irradiated, water-immersed plasmonic nanoparticles,” ACS Nano, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 2045–2051, 2017.
[43] F. Liu, F. Wang, X. Hao, Z. Fan, J. Tan, “Effects of foam cathode electrode structure on alkaline water electrolysis for hydrogen production,” Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 298, p. 120307, 2024.
[44] S. Wang, K. Liu, X. Yao, L. Jiang, “Bioinspired surfaces with superwettability: New insight on theory, design, and applications,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 115, no. 16, pp. 8230–8293, 2015.
[45] G.-H. Ban, Y. Li, M. M. Wall, and S. Jun, “A nanoengineered stainless steel surface to combat bacterial attachment and biofilm formation,” Foods, vol. 9, no. 11, p. 1518, 2020.
[46] C. Zhu, D. Du, A. Eychmüller, Y. Lin, “Engineering ordered and nonordered porous noble metal nanostructures: Synthesis, assembly, and their applications in electrochemistry,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 115, no. 16, pp. 8896–8943, 2015.
[47] Y. He, S. Liu, M. Wang, Q. Cheng, T. Qian, C. Yan, “Deciphering engineering principle of three-phase interface for advanced gas-involved electrochemical reactions,” Journal of Energy Chemistry, vol. 80, pp. 302–323, 2023.
[48] H. Imanzadeh, A. Khataee, M. Nozari-Asbemarz, J. J. Leahy, M. Amiri, “A facile strategy for synthesis of flower-like FeNiS₂ nanocomposite via integration of binary metal-organic framework and metal sulfide for enhanced electrocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction,” Surfaces and Interfaces, vol. 53, p. 105049, 2024.
[49] X. Lu, D. Yadav, L. Zhou, X. Li, L. Ma, D. Jing, “Evolution of hydrogen bubbles on a microelectrode driven by constant currents and its impact on potential response,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 500, p. 156890, 2024.
[50] J. Park, M. J. Kim, Y. Kim, S. Lee, S. Park, W. Yang, “Insights into bubble dynamics in water splitting,” ACS Energy Letters, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 212–237, 2025.
[51] J. Görtz, J. Seiler, P. Kolmer, A. Jupke, “Raising the curtain: Bubble size measurement inside parallel plate electrolyzers,” Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 286, p. 119550, 2024.
[52] P. Chandran, S. Bakshi, D. Chatterjee, “Study on the characteristics of hydrogen bubble formation and its transport during electrolysis of water,” Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 138, pp. 99–109, 2015.
[53] Y. He, Y. Cui, Z. Zhao, Y. Chen, W. Shang, P. Tan, “Strategies for bubble removal in electrochemical systems,” Energy Reviews, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 100015, 2023.
[54] J. Qin, T. Xie, D. Zhou, L. Luo, Z. Zhang, Z. Shang, et al., “Kinetic study of electrochemically produced hydrogen bubbles on Pt electrodes with tailored geometries,” Nano Research, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 2154–2159, 2021.
[55] N. Bidin, S. R. Azni, M. A. A. Bakar, A. R. Johari, D. H. F. A. Munap, M. F. Salebi, et al., “The effect of sunlight in hydrogen production from water electrolysis,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 133–142, 2017.
[56] X. Zhao, H. Ren, L. Luo, “Gas bubbles in electrochemical gas evolution reactions,” Langmuir, vol. 35, no. 16, pp. 5392–5408, 2019.
[57] X. Liu, S. Zheng, K. Wang, “Influence of bubble generation on the microchannel electrochemical gas evolution reaction,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 463, p. 142453, 2023.
[58] J. Du, B. Liu, Y. Zhao, “Nucleation bubble boundary layer theory for ultra-fast electrochemical polishing of additive manufacturing components,” Additive Manufacturing, vol. 92, p. 104362, 2024.
[59] M. Aghasibeig, C. Moreau, A. Dolatabadi, R. Wuthrich, “Fabrication of nickel electrode coatings by combination of atmospheric and suspension plasma spray processes,” Surface and Coatings Technology, vol. 285, pp. 68–76, 2016.
[60] B. J. Plowman, L. A. Jones, S. K. Bhargava, “Building with bubbles: The formation of high surface area honeycomb-like films via hydrogen bubble templated electrodeposition,” Chemical Communications, vol. 51, no. 21, pp. 4331–4346, 2015.
[61] M. Li, P. Xie, L. Yu, L. Luo, X. Sun, “Bubble engineering on micro-/nanostructured electrodes for water splitting,” ACS Nano, vol. 17, no. 23, pp. 23299–23316, 2023.
[62] G. Tang, Y. Chen, J. Chen, L. Liu, H. Wen, W. Liu, et al., “Flow-through porous electrode for enhanced oxygen evolution reaction by promoting gas bubble release from water splitting,” Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 296, p. 120242, 2024.
[63] P. Xiao, Y. Yan, X. Ge, Z. Liu, J.-Y. Wang, X. Wang, “Investigation of molybdenum carbide nano-rod as an efficient and durable electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution in acidic and alkaline media,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 154–155, pp. 232–237, 2014.
[64] Y.-R. Liu, X. Li, G. Q. Han, B. Dong, W. H. Hu, X. Shang, et al., “Template-assisted synthesis of highly dispersed MoS₂ nanosheets with enhanced activity for hydrogen evolution reaction,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 2054–2060, 2017.
[65] Y. Lyu, R. Wang, L. Tao, Y. Zou, H. Zhou, T. Liu, et al., “In-situ evolution of active layers on commercial stainless steel for stable water splitting,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 248, pp. 277–285, 2019.
[66] S. Jing, L. Zhang, L. Luo, J. Lu, S. Yin, P. K. Shen, et al., “N-doped porous molybdenum carbide nanobelts as efficient catalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 224, pp. 533–540, 2018.
[67] Y. Liu, K. Zhang, D. Zhang, W. Dong, T. Jiang, H. Zhou, et al., “Industrial stainless steel meshes for efficient electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution,” Journal of Energy Storage, vol. 41, p. 102844, 2021.
[68] I. Barauskienė, G. Laukaitis, E. Valatka, “Stainless steel as an electrocatalyst for overall water splitting under alkaline and neutral conditions,” Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, vol. 950, p. 117880, 2023.
[69] A. A. M. Abahussain, A. F. Alharbi, W. Wazeer, H. El-Deeb, A. B. A. A. Nassr, “Stainless steel as gas evolving electrodes in water electrolysis: Boosting the electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction on electrodeposited Ni@CoP modified stainless steel electrodes,” Fuel, vol. 368, p. 131605, 2024.
[70] K. Zhang, Y. Liu, B. Wang, F. Yu, Y. Yang, L. Xing, et al., “Three-dimensional interconnected MoS₂ nanosheets on industrial 316L stainless steel mesh as an efficient hydrogen evolution electrode,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 1555–1564, 2019.
[71] M. Kim, J. Ha, N. Shin, Y.-T. Kim, J. Choi, “Self-activated anodic nanoporous stainless steel electrocatalysts with high durability for the hydrogen evolution reaction,” Electrochimica Acta, vol. 364, p. 137315, 2020.
[72] T. Feng, Q Zeng, S Lu, M Yang, S Tao, Y. Chen, Y. Zhou, et al., “Morphological and interfacial engineering of cobalt-based electrocatalysts by carbon dots for enhanced water splitting,” ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 7047–7057, 2019.
[73] B. Mao, B. Wang, F. Yu, K. Zhang, Z. Zhang, J. Hao, et al., “Hierarchical MoS₂ nanoflowers on carbon cloth as an efficient cathode electrode for hydrogen evolution under all pH values,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 43, no. 24, pp. 11038–11046, 2018.
[74] W. Dong, H. Zhou, B. Mao, Z. Zhang, Y. Liu, Y. Liu, et al., “Efficient MOF-derived V–Ni₃S₂ nanosheet arrays for electrocatalytic overall water splitting in alkali,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 46, no. 18, pp. 10773–10782, 2021.
[75] M. Pierpaoli, P. Jakobczyk, and M. Sawczak, et al., “Carbon nanoarchitectures as high-performance electrodes for the electrochemical oxidation of landfill leachate,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 401, p. 123407, 2021.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
