Influence of environmental, social, and governance scores on the economic performance of publicly listed companies in Malaysia

Authors

  • Kirrthana Muthukumaru Graduate School of Business, Universiti Sains Malaysia 11800 USM, Penang, Malaysia , University of Science Malaysia image/svg+xml
  • To Quyen Nguyen Graduate School of Business, Universiti Sains Malaysia 11800 USM, Penang, Malaysia , University of Science Malaysia image/svg+xml
  • Jeffrey S.S. Cheah Graduate School of Business, Universiti Sains Malaysia 11800 USM, Penang, Malaysia , University of Science Malaysia image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15282/jgi.9.1.2026.13385

Keywords:

Agency Theory, Economic Performance, Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG), FTSE Russell ESG Ratings, Public-Listed Companies, Stakeholder Theory, Sustainability

Abstract

As Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) criteria become central to global investment strategy, their financial implications in emerging markets such as Malaysia remain an important question. This conceptual study develops a framework linking overall ESG performance and its environmental, social, and governance dimensions to economic performance, represented by Return on Assets (ROA) and Tobin's Q, among companies listed on Bursa Malaysia. Grounded in stakeholder and agency theories, the framework explains how ESG commitments may translate into corporate value through stakeholder relationships, governance quality, operational efficiency, and market confidence. The proposed framework offers a structured basis for future empirical testing and provides implications for investors, corporate leaders, and regulators seeking to align sustainability practices with long-term economic performance.

References

Al-Najjar, B., & Anfimiadou, A. (2011). Environmental policies and firm value. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.713

Amel-Zadeh, A., & Serafeim, G. (2018). Why and how investors use ESG information: Evidence from a global survey. Financial Analysts Journal, 74(3), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v74.n3.2

Bank Negara Malaysia. (2021). Climate Change and Principle-based Taxonomy. https://www.bnm.gov.my/-/climate-change-principle-based-taxonomy

Barnea, A., & Rubin, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0496-z

Bursa Malaysia. (2020). FTSE4 Good ESG scores on Malaysian public listed companies now available on Bursa Malaysia website. https://www.bursamalaysia.com/cn/about_bursa/media_centre/ftse4good-esg-scores-on-malaysian-public-listed-companies-now-available-on-bursa-malaysia-website

Chen, S., Song, Y., & Gao, P. (2023). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and financial outcomes: Analyzing the impact of ESG on financial performance. Journal of Environmental Management, 345, 118829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118829

Chiew, K.-Z., & Cheah, J. S. S. (2025). Re`assessing ICT adoption among Malaysian SMEs: A post-COVID-19 thematic literature review using TOE framework. Journal of the Community Development in Asia, 8(2), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.32535/jcda.v8i2.3893

Derwall, J. (2007). The economic virtues of SRI and CSR (ERIM Ph.D. Series Research in Management No. 101) [Doctoral dissertation, Erasmus University Rotterdam]. Erasmus Research Institute of Management. http://hdl.handle.net/1765/8986

Duque-Grisales, E., & Aguilera-Caracuel, J. (2021). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) scores and financial performance of multilatinas: Moderating effects of geographic international diversification and financial slack. Journal of Business Ethics, 168(2), 315–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04177-w

Elsayed, K., & Paton, D. (2005). The impact of environmental performance on firm performance: Static and dynamic panel data evidence. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 16(3), 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2004.04.004

Farahani, H. A., Rahiminezhad, A., Same, L., & Immannezhad, K. (2010). A comparison of Partial Least Squares (PLS) and Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regressions in predicting of couples mental health based on their communicational patterns. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 1459–1463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.308

Foo, W.-K., & Cheah, J. S. S. (2026). Beyond parcels: Exploring the service quality-driven paradigm of customer satisfaction in the courier sector. International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 53(1), 106–123. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSOM.2026.150894

Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917

Galbreath, J. (2013). ESG in focus: The Australian evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(3), 529–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1607-9

García-Sánchez, I. M., Hussain, N., Martínez-Ferrero, J., & Ruiz-Barbadillo, E. (2019). Impact of disclosure and assurance quality of corporate sustainability reports on access to finance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(4), 832–848. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1724

Kim, S., & Li, Z. (2021). Understanding the impact of ESG practices in corporate finance. Sustainability, 13(7), 3746. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073746

Lee, D. D., Faff, R. W., & Langfield-Smith, K. (2009). Revisiting the vexing question: Does superior corporate social performance lead to improved financial performance? Australian Journal of Management, 34(1), 21–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/031289620903400103

Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305. https://doi.org/10.2307/3556659

Monda, B., & Giorgino, M. (2013). Corporate governance and shareholder value in listed firms: An empirical analysis in five countries (France, Italy, Japan, UK, USA). Corporate Ownership & Control, 10(3), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv10i3siart3

Nekhili, M., Boukadhaba, A., Nagati, H., & Chtioui, T. (2021). ESG performance and market value: The moderating role of employee board representation. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(14), 3061–3087. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2019.1629989

Ng, C.-H., & Cheah, J. S. S. (2025). A conceptual framework for synergizing marketing and environmental innovations to enhance sustainable business performance in Malaysia's technology sector. International Journal of Accounting & Finance in Asia Pacific, 8(2), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.32535/ijafap.v8i2.3928

Panda, B., & Leepsa, N. M. (2017). Agency theory: Review of theory and evidence on problems and perspectives. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 10(1), 74–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974686217701467

Sawa, T. (1969). The exact sampling distribution of ordinary least squares and two-stage least squares estimators. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 64(327), 923–937. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1969.10501024

Serafeim, G. (2020). Social-impact efforts that create real value. Harvard Business Review, 98(5), 38–48. https://hbr.org/2020/09/social-impact-efforts-that-create-real-value

Shin, K., You, S., & Kim, M. (2021). A comparison of Two-Stage Least Squares (TSLS) and Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) in estimating the structural relationship between after-school exercise and academic performance. Mathematics, 9(23), 3105. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9233105

Sisodia, R. S. (2009). Doing business in the age of conscious capitalism. Journal of Indian Business Research, 1(2/3), 188–192. https://doi.org/10.1108/17554190911005354

Taliento, M., Favino, C., & Netti, A. (2019). Impact of environmental, social, and governance information on economic performance: Evidence of a corporate 'sustainability advantage' from Europe. Sustainability, 11(6), 1738. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061738

Tamimi, N., & Sebastianelli, R. (2017). Transparency among S&P 500 companies: An analysis of ESG disclosure scores. Management Decision, 55(8), 1660–1680. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-01-2017-0018

Tan, Z. Y., & Cheah, J. S. S. (2025). Beyond good intentions: Why consumers choose social enterprise products. Social Enterprise Journal, 21(5), 765–785. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-08-2024-0124

Tarmuji, I., Maelah, R., & Tarmuji, N. H. (2016). The impact of environmental, social and governance practices (ESG) on economic performance: Evidence from ESG score. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 7(3), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijtef.2016.7.3.501

Taufiq, M. Q. A. M., & Cheah, J. S. S. (2026). Beyond service quality: Patient-perceived trust and revisit intention toward private dental clinics. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-12-2025-0906

Teoh, K.-S., & Cheah, J. S. S. (2025). Enhancing SME resilience during COVID-19: A systematic review of digital capabilities, relational strengths, and organizational agility. Journal of the Community Development in Asia, 8(2), 266–284. https://doi.org/10.32535/jcda.v8i2.3894

Velte, P. (2017). Does ESG performance have an impact on financial performance? Evidence from Germany. Journal of Global Responsibility, 8(2), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-11-2016-0029

Yoon, B., Lee, J. H., & Byun, R. (2018). Does ESG performance enhance firm value? Evidence from Korea. Sustainability, 10(10), 3635. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103635

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Muthukumaru, K., Nguyen, T. Q., & S.S. Cheah, J. (2026). Influence of environmental, social, and governance scores on the economic performance of publicly listed companies in Malaysia. Journal of Governance and Integrity, 9(1), 1213-1218. https://doi.org/10.15282/jgi.9.1.2026.13385