Investigation of Wind Pressure Coefficient Distribution on High-rise Building due to Different Shape Modifications using Computer Simulation

Authors

  • S. N. S. Abd Manap Department of Civil Engineering, Kulliyyah of Engineering, International Islamic University Malaysia 53100 Gombak Selangor
  • Siti Noratikah Che Deraman Department of Civil Engineering, Kulliyyah of Engineering, International Islamic University Malaysia 53100 Gombak Selangor
  • N. Md Husain Department of Civil Engineering, Kulliyyah of Engineering, International Islamic University Malaysia 53100 Gombak Selangor
  • W. N. F. Wan Hassan Department of Civil Engineering, Kulliyyah of Engineering, International Islamic University Malaysia 53100 Gombak Selangor
  • S. A. Saad Department of Civil Engineering, Kulliyyah of Engineering, International Islamic University Malaysia 53100 Gombak Selangor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15282/construction.v5i2.12257

Keywords:

High-rise , Wind Pressure, Computational Fluid Dynamics, Computer Simulation, Windstorms

Abstract

High-rise buildings are rapidly flourishing in various regions due to accelerating industrialization and increasing population density. The limited availability of land has driven this trend. Nonetheless, wind pressure significantly influences the design and structural stability of these tall structures. Therefore, it is crucial to account for wind loads when designing high-rise buildings, particularly in areas prone to strong winds, such as coastal regions, where winds can exert substantial force on the structure. This study focuses on analyzing wind pressure coefficient distribution around high-rise buildings by examining building shapes modifications and wind flow behavior through Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations. The suggested tapering ratio and aerodynamic modification factor is 10% was applied to this study. The findings reveal that the maximum negative pressure coefficient (CP) or suction observed is -1.630, associated with the M4 model, which features a tapering design with rounded corners. This high suction is attributed to wind flow behavior for instance the flow separation and reattachment at the edge of the building's top (Zone 2). Except for the M4 model, which has a rounded edge on the leeward side, the thickness of the recirculation eddies is nearly uniform across all models. The M4 model's design results in a smaller wake region and reduced turbulence on the leeward side. Therefore, the M4 shape is the most effective in minimizing the impact of wind on the building structure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] G. Vinayagamurthy and K. B. Rajasekarababu, “Experimental and computational simulation of an open terrain wind flow around a setback building using hybrid turbulence models,” Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 145-154, 2018.

[2] R. Yanalagaran, N. I. Ramli, and P. J. Ramadhansyah, “Overview of monsoon induced coastal erosion disaster in Peninsular Malaysia based on Mass-Media Reports,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2019.

[3] B. Mou, B. J. He, D. X. Zhao, K. W. Chau, “Numerical simulation of the effects of building dimensional variation on wind pressure distribution,” Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 293–309, 2017.

[4] L. Wang, and W. Zhang, “The influence of chamfered and rounded corners on vortex-induced vibration of super-tall buildings,” Applied Science, vol.13, no. 2, pp. 1049, 2023.

[5] A. Bharat, and A. S. Ahmed “Effects of high-rise building complex on the wind flow patterns on surrounding urban pockets,” International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 21-26, 2012.

[6] R. R. Ahirwar “Experimental study of wind-induced pressures on tall buildings of different shapes,” Wind and Structure, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 441–453, 2021

[7] R. Merrick, and G. Bitsuamlak, “Shape effects on the wind-induced response of high-rise buildings,” Journal of Wind and Engineering, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1-18, 2009.

[8] A. K. Bairagi, and S. K. Dalui “Distribution of wind pressure around different shape tall building,” in Lecture Notes on Multidisciplinary Industrial Engineering, Springer Nature, vol. Part F252, pp. 31–38. 2020.

[9] R. Kumar, V. K. Mewada, M. T. Scholar, “Analysis of aerodynamic modification of the shape of the tall structure-A review,” International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in Education, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 576-581, 2021.

[10] M. M. Khan, and A. K. Roy, “CFD simulation of wind effects on industrial RCC chimney,” International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1008–1020, 2017.

[11] J. Franke, A. Hellsten, H. Schlünzen, and B. Carissimo, “Best practice guideline for the CFD simulation of flows in the urban environment,” COST Action 732, Quality assurance and improvement of microscale meteorological models. 2007.

[12] Y. Tominaga, A. Mochida, R. Yoshie, H. Kataoka, T. Nozu, M. Yoshikawa, et al., “AIJ guidelines for practical applications of CFD to pedestrian wind environment around buildings,” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, vol. 96, pp.1749-1761, 2008.

[13] Fluent “ANSYS Workbench User’s Guide,” ANSYS Incorporated, USA. 2010.

[14] W. Zhang, and P. P. Sarkar, “Influence of buildings on tornado-induced wind loads of a low-rise building,” Procedure for the 11th Americas Conference on Wind Engineering, Puerto Rico. 2019.

[15] Y. Tominaga, “Flow around a high-rise building using steady and unsteady RANS CFD: Effect of large-scale fluctuations on the velocity statistics,” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, vol. 142, pp. 93-103, 2015.

[16] Y. Kim, and J. Kanda “Characteristics of aerodynamic forces and pressures on square plan buildings with height variations,” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, vol. 98, no. 8–9, pp. 449–465, 2010.

[17] F. Baetke, and H. Warner “Numerical simulation of turbulent flow over surface-mounted obstacle with sharp edges and corners,” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, vol. 35, pp. 129-147, 1990.

[18] H. Irtaza, M. A. Javed, and A. Jameel, “Effect of wind pressures by variation of roof pitch of low-rise hip-roof building,” Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, vo. 16, no. 6, pp. 869-889, 2015.

[19] S. R. M. Isdris, S. S. Zaini, M. H. H. Ishaik, M. S. A. Aziz, and N. A. Rahman, “Numerical investigation on the distribution of pressure coefficients of modified building shapes,” Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 3139–3155, 2023.

[20] J. Franke, C. Hirsch, A. G. Jensen, H. W. Krus, M. Schatzmann, P. S. Westbury, et al., “Recommendations on the use of CFD in wind engineering,” COST Action C14: The Use of CFD in Predicting Pedestrian Wind Environment, 2004.

[21] Z. Zhao, “Wind flow characteristics and their effects on low-rise buildings,” Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Texas Tech University, 1997.

[22] S. N. C. Deraman. “Distribution of pressure coefficient along the external profile of rural house exposed to windstorm in Malaysia using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD),” Ph.D. Thesis, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia, 2019.

[23] J. J. A. Amin, and A.K. Ahuja “Aerodynamic modifications to the shape of the buildings: A review of the state-of-the-art,” Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing), vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 433-450, 2010.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-29

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

[1]
S. N. S. Abd Manap, S. N. Che Deraman, N. Md Husain, W. N. F. Wan Hassan, and S. A. Saad, “Investigation of Wind Pressure Coefficient Distribution on High-rise Building due to Different Shape Modifications using Computer Simulation”, Constr., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 255–261, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.15282/construction.v5i2.12257.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 58

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)