COMPARATIVE STUDY: ACTIVITY BASED COSTING AND TIME DRIVEN ACTIVITY BASED COSTING IN ELECTRONIC INDUSTRY

Authors

  • N.F. Zamrud Faculty of Manufacturing and Mechatronic Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, 26600, Pekan, Pahang, Malaysia
  • M.Y. Abu Faculty of Manufacturing and Mechatronic Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, 26600, Pekan, Pahang, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15282/jmmst.v4i1.3840

Keywords:

Activity based costing; Time driven activity based costing; Electronic industry

Abstract

By the 1980s, Traditional Cost Accounting (TCA) is no longer reflecting the current economic reality due to distorted information about the profitability of their orders, products, and customers. In addition, Activity-based Costing (ABC) is a costing method originally developed to overcome the shortcoming of TCA method in the era of rapidly increasing product complexity and diversification. However, it is not universally accepted because it ignores the potential for unused capacity which will be beneficial for forecasting. The objective of this work is to compare the advantages of ABC and Time-driven Activity-Based Costing (TDABC) by analyzing the features towards costing sustainment. The work begins by collecting data at electric electronic industry located at Pahang and the product selected is a magnetic inductor. ABC focuses on the costs inherent in the activity based products to produce, distribute or support the products concerned. TDABC uses time equation and capacity cost rate (CCR) to measure the unused capacity with respect to the time and cost. This work has successfully compares the methodology between ABC and TDABC in electronic industry. The item such as stages for cost allocation, determination of drivers, action taken for an additional activity, cost consideration for implementation, system building, system update, information given from each method, transparency, overestimation of cost, differentiation of service level, oversimplification of activities and capacity forecast and planning. It concludes that both have their strength according to the industry needs.

References

Cooper. R. (1993). Implementing Activity-Based Cost Management: Moving from Analysis to Action. Inst of Management Accountants. Retrieved from http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/20001705171/en/

Esmalifalak, H., Albin, M. S. & Behzadpoor, M. (2015). A comparative study on the activity based costing systems: Traditional, fuzzy and Monte Carlo approaches. Health Policy and Technology, 4(1),58–67.

Kaplan, R. S. & Anderson, S. R. (2007). Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing: A Simpler and More Powerful Path to Higher Profits. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Barros, R. S. & Da Costa Ferreira, A. M. D. S. (2017). Time-driven activity-based costing: Designing a model in a Portuguese production environment. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, 14(1),2–20.

Fito M.A., Llobet J. & Cuguero N. (2018). The activity-based costing model trajectory: A path of lights and shadows. Intangible Capital, 14(1),146-161.

Alsmadi M., Almani A. & Khan, Z. (2014). Implementing an integrated ABC and TOC approach to enhance decision making in a Lean context. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 31(8),906-920.

Kolosowski M. & Chwastyk, P. (2014). Economic aspects of company processes improvement. Procedia Engineering, 69,222-230.

Kont K.R. (2011). New cost accounting models in measuring of library employees' performance. Library Management, 33(1/2),50-65.

Kim S., Ko W. & Bang S. (2015). Assessment of activity-based pyro process costs for an engineering-scale facility in Korea. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 47(7),849-858.

Gregorio L.T.D. & Soares C.A.P. (2013). Comparison between the mix-based costing and the activity-based costing methods in the costing of construction Projects. Journal of Cost Analysis and Parametrics, 6(2),77-95.

Tsai W.-H. (2018). Carbon taxes and carbon right costs analysis for the tire industry. Energies, 11(8),1-22.

Khataie A.H. & Bulgak A.A. (2013). A cost of quality decision support model for lean manufacturing: activity‐based costing application. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 30(7),751-764.

Gottmann J., Pfeffer M. & Sihn W. (2013). Process oriented production evaluation. Procedia CIRP, 12,336-341.

Dwivedi R. & Chakraborty S. (2016). Adoption of an activity based costing model in an Indian steel plant. Verslas: teorija ir praktika, 17(4),289-298.

Fang Y. & Ng, S.T. (2011). Applying activity‐based costing approach for construction logistics cost analysis. Construction Innovation, 11(3),259-281.

Parker L.D. (2016). From scientific to activity based office management: a mirage of change. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 12(2),177-202.

Tsai W.-H., Tsaur T.-S., Chou Y.-W., Liu J.-Y., Hsu J.-L. & Hsieh C.-L. (2014). Integrating the activity-based costing system and life-cycle assessment into green decision-making. International Journal of Production Research, 53(2),451-465.

Kostakis H., Albayrak T., Boskou G. & Palisidis, G. (2011). Modelling activity‐based costing in restaurants. Journal of Modelling in Management, 6(3),243-257.

Orji I. & Wei S. (2016). A detailed calculation model for costing of green manufacturing. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1),65-86.

Jing H. & Songqing L. (2011). The research of environmental costs based on activity based cost. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 10,147-151.

Tsai W.-H., Chen H.-C., Leu J.-D., Chang Y.-C. & Lin T.W. (2013). A product-mix decision model using green manufacturing technologies under activity-based costing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 57,178-187.

Lau H., Nakandala D., Samaranayake P. & Shum P. (2016). A hybrid multi-criteria decision model for supporting customer-focused profitability analysis. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(6),1105-1130.

Marinho Neto H.F., Agostinho F., Almeida C.M.V.B., Moreno García R.R. & Giannetti B.F. (2018). Activity-based costing using multicriteria drivers: an accounting proposal to boost companies toward sustainability. Frontiers in Energy Research, 36(6),1-12.

Yang C.-H. (2018). An optimization portfolio decision model of life cycle activity-based costing with carbon footprint constraints for hybrid green power strategies. Computers & Operations Research, 96,256-27.

Cassettari L., Mosca M., Mosca R., Rolando F., Costa M. & Pisaturo, V. (2016). IVF cycle cost estimation using Activity Based Costing and Monte Carlo simulation. Health Care Manag Sci, 19(1),20-30.

Downloads

Published

27-03-2020

How to Cite

Zamrud, N., & Abu, M. (2020). COMPARATIVE STUDY: ACTIVITY BASED COSTING AND TIME DRIVEN ACTIVITY BASED COSTING IN ELECTRONIC INDUSTRY. Journal of Modern Manufacturing Systems and Technology, 4(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.15282/jmmst.v4i1.3840

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)