PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT ANALYSIS USING SWOT AND BALANCED SCORECARD METHODS

Authors

  • Shafira Putri Ramadhani Department of Industrial Engineering, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • M. Qurtubi Department of Industrial Engineering, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • M Ragil Suryoputro Department of Industrial Engineering, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Wahyudhi Sutrisno Wahyudhi Sutrisno Department of Industrial Engineering, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15282/jmmst.v2i2.3026

Keywords:

SWOT

Abstract

CV. XYZ is a company engaged in goat farming and goat milk processing which is developing to place itself in the industry today. To place companies in the industrial world must know the level of performance and strategies needed. One method that can be used is SWOT and the balanced scorecard methods. For the SWOT results, the company is in quadrant I, which means that the company is very profitable because the company has internal power to take advantage of opportunities that exist in the external environment. Then for balanced scorecard results, the first financial perspective: the average net profit margin is 42.31%, the average ROA is 6.91%, the average ATO is 15.85%, and the average operating ratio is 1.043. All measures in the financial perspective have reached the target. Strategic measure in the customer's perspective: the level of customer satisfaction is 77.58% which has reached the target and customer acquisition an average of 3.49% which has not reached the target. Strategic measure internal business process perspective: promotion intensity, product innovation, after-sales service, and production efficiency that has reached the target. Strategic measure of growth and learning perspective using: employee satisfaction level of 85.69%, average employee retention of 14.64%, and average employee productivity of 5.05%. Strategic measures in the perspective of growth and learning cannot reach the targets of the company. Based on the overall calculation on the company, the performance rating scale is 0.20 and is included in the fairly good category.

References

Bititci, U. C. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. Integrated Performance Measurement System : A Development Guide (1997).

Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. Translating Strategy Into Action The Balanced Scorecard. Jakarta: Erlangga (1996).

Koesomowidjojo, S. R. Balanced Scorecard: An Organizational Performance Measurement Model with Four Perspectives. Jakarta: Raih Asa Sukses (2017).

Novanda, D. Journal of Industrial Engineering, Andalas University, Padang. Implementation of SWOT Balanced Scorecard Integration in Designing Performance Measurement Systems (2014).

Rangkuti, F. SWOT Balanced Scorecard. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama (2011).

Schaltegger, H. Journal Business Ethics . The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard : A Systematic Review of Architectures (2016).

Sutanto, Y., et. al. Information Technology Journal. Analysis of Value Innovation as a Corporate Strategy Design at STMIK AMIKOM Yogyakarta (2013).

Downloads

Published

01-10-2019

How to Cite

Ramadhani, S. P., Qurtubi, M., Suryoputro, M. R., & Wahyudhi Sutrisno, W. S. (2019). PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT ANALYSIS USING SWOT AND BALANCED SCORECARD METHODS. Journal of Modern Manufacturing Systems and Technology, 3, 69–73. https://doi.org/10.15282/jmmst.v2i2.3026

Issue

Section

Articles