Lean Governance for Administrative Service Delivery in Malaysian Public Higher Education: A Review of Socio-Technical and Process Improvement Perspectives

Authors

  • Zahiruddin Mohd Zain
  • NORAZLIANIE SAZALI Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, 26600 Pekan, Pahang, Malaysia
  • Afdhal Junaidi
  • Ramli Junid

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15282/

Keywords:

Lean governance, Administrative service delivery, Malaysian higher education, Public sector conducive ecosystem, Socio-technical systems

Abstract

Efficient, transparent, accountable, and responsive administrative services are essential to public higher education institutions. Although lean management originated in manufacturing, its principles can be adapted to administrative services to reduce waiting, rework, duplication, unnecessary approvals, and unclear handovers. This review examines lean governance for administrative service delivery in Malaysian public higher education, with contextual reference to Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah (UMPSA). The review integrates literature on lean management, socio-technical systems, higher education administration, and Malaysian policy initiatives, including the Malaysia Education Blueprint 2015–2025 (Higher Education), public-sector modernisation, and the Public Sector Conducive Ecosystem (EKSA). The synthesis indicates that administrative inefficiency is associated not only with procedural complexity but also with weak alignment among institutional strategy, key performance indicators, workload distribution, digital systems, and organisational culture. Accordingly, the paper proposes an integrated lean governance framework that links policy and institutional drivers with lean practices and socio-technical enablers to support administrative service improvement. The framework is conceptual and requires future empirical validation.

References

[1] A. R. Ahmad, A. Farley, and M. Naidoo, “The Study of Government-university Relationship in Malaysian Higher Education System,” International Education Studies, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 25–34, 2012, doi: 10.5539/IES.V5N5P25.

[2] P. S. Aithal and A. K. Maiya, “Development of a New Conceptual Model for Improvement of the Quality Services of Higher Education Institutions in Academic, Administrative, and Research Areas,” SSRN Electronic Journal, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.2139/SSRN.4770790.

[3] R. Ambarwati and D. Sischasari, “Optimizing operational costs to improve accessibility of higher education: a novel integration of activity-based costing and Lean management,” International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 921–942, Apr. 2026, doi: 10.1108/IJLSS-03-2025-0058.

[4] M. A. Rogers, H. Alshemeili, M. S. Al Suwaidi, A. Pop, and E. E. Gallegos, “Practitioner-Oriented System Engineering Framework for Nuclear Administrative Processes,” Nucl. Technol., Jun. 2026, doi: 10.1080/00295450.2026.2659458.

[5] N. A. Siddiquee, “Paradoxes of public administration in Malaysia,” 2023, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. Accessed: Jul. 12, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://researchnow.flinders.edu.au/en/publications/paradoxes-of-public-administration-in-malaysia/

[6] M. Soliman, “Toyota Production System Concepts: The Guidebook to Toyota’s 13 Pillars System,” SSRN Electronic Journal, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.2139/SSRN.4754065.

[7] M. Azuwadi, M. Yasin, and M. Ghazali, “Issues and Challenges on the Reinforcement of Good Governance at Malaysia’s Public Universities from Administrative Perspective,” Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 17–29, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.24191/JIKM.V15I1.3839.

[8] N. F. Ishak and V. Thiruchelvam, “Sustainable innovations in Malaysia’s public procurement: strategic policy initiatives and coherences,” International Journal of Innovation Science, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 338–372, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1108/IJIS-08-2022-0144.

[9] M. A. D. Mohd Fauzi, R. Che Razak, and N. S. Zulqernain, “Mediation Impact of Socio-Technical Lean Implementation on Critical Success Factor and Service Quality Performance,” Industry Forward and Technology Transformation in Business and Entrepreneurship, pp. 435–447, 2023, doi: 10.1007/978-981-99-2337-3_38.

[10] S. Simonyte, R. Adomaitiene, and D. Ruzele, “Experience of lean application in higher education institutions,” International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 408–427, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1108/IJLSS-11-2020-0208.

[11] Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia, “Malaysia Education Blueprint 2015–2025 (Higher Education),” Putrajaya, Malaysia, 2015.

[12] Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah, “UMPSA Strategic Plan 2026–2030 (UMPSA30),” 2026.

[13] Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia, “Malaysia Higher Education Blueprint / Rancangan Pendidikan Tinggi Malaysia 2026–2035,” Putrajaya, Malaysia, 2026.

Published

30-09-2026

How to Cite

[1]
Z. Mohd Zain, N. SAZALI, A. Junaidi, and R. Junid, “Lean Governance for Administrative Service Delivery in Malaysian Public Higher Education: A Review of Socio-Technical and Process Improvement Perspectives”, JMMST, vol. 10, no. 2, Sep. 2026, doi: 10.15282/.