Advanced retaining wall using reinforced soil block and rubber backfill incorporated IoT monitoring system

Authors

  • Zaffri Zaki Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia , Universiti Putra Malaysia image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3616-0612
  • Nik Norsyahariati Nik Daud Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia , Universiti Putra Malaysia image/svg+xml
  • Muhammad Zulhafizi Muhammad Zuraidi Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia , Universiti Putra Malaysia image/svg+xml
  • Abdullah Iman Sahatim Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia , Universiti Putra Malaysia image/svg+xml
  • Abubakar Sadiq Muhammed Department of Civil and Water Resources Engineering, University of Maiduguri, Maiduguri 600104, Borno, Nigeria , University of Maiduguri image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15282/construction.v6i1.13691

Keywords:

Retaining wall system, Soil block, Rubber-soil backfill, IoT monitoring , Environmental

Abstract

The critical challenge in geotechnical engineering related to the construction of a retaining wall is the poor properties of native soil, which often consist of weak materials unsuitable for structural support. Consequently, the cost of importing high-quality backfill materials is frequently required. This study investigates an innovative retaining wall system developed using kenaf fiber-reinforced soil blocks and rubber-soil backfill material integrated with an Internet of Things (IoT)-based monitoring system. The objectives of the study are to evaluate the properties of kenaf fiber-reinforced soil blocks and soil-rubber backfill, and to assess retaining wall stability by incorporating a real-time environmental monitoring system. The methodology was divided into two phases; Phase 1 involved laboratory evaluation of the mechanical properties of the fiber-reinforced soil block and soil-rubber backfill, while Phase 2 focused on monitoring environmental parameters using an IoT-based Arduino system.  The results showed that the kenaf fiber-reinforced soil blocks at a 0.75% concentration achieved a compressive strength of 0.96 N/mm² and a flexural strength of 0.75 N/mm², demonstrating significant improvements in load-bearing capacity and resistance to environmental degradation. Furthermore, incorporating rubber waste materials from discarded tires as backfill at optimal concentrations of 20% to 30% enhanced the flexibility, stress distribution, and hydrostatic pressure and drainage performance, as indicated by its laboratory-scale results. The IoT monitoring system enables early detection of slope conditions susceptible to landslides and soil saturation, thereby enhancing early warning capabilities. Overall, the proposed retaining wall system shows strong potential for application in infrastructure projects, particularly in areas requiring improved drainage and sustainability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] K.G. Garg, “Retaining wall with reinforced backfill – a case study,” Geotextiles and Geomembranes, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 135–149, 1998, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-1144(98)00003-X.

[2] S.B. Reddy, and A.M. Krishna, “Recycled tire chips mixed with sand as lightweight backfill material in retaining wall applications: an experimental investigation,” International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 1–11, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-015-0036-0.

[3] M. Akbar, P. Huali, J. Huang, et al., “Seismic response comparison of various geogrid reinforced earth-retaining walls: based on shaking table and 3D FE analysis,” Scientific Reports, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-64203-4.

[4] V. Cecich, L. Gonzales, A. Hoisaeter, J. Williams, and K. Reddy, “Use of shredded tires as lightweight backfill material for retaining structures,” Waste Management & Research, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 433–451, 1996, https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X9601400503.

[5] S.M.B. Helwany, G. Reardon, and J.T.H. Wu, “Effects of backfill on the performance of GRS retaining walls,” Geotextiles and Geomembranes, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 1999, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-1144(98)00021-1.

[6] N.F. Isa, M.F.M. Zaki, L.A. Sofri, M.A. Rahim, Z.M. Ghazaly, and N. Bidin, “The use of rubber manufacturing waste as concrete additive,” Journal of Advances in Applied Mechanics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 12–18, 2014.

[7] B. Indraratna, S. Nimbalkar, and T. Neville, “Performance assessment of reinforced ballasted rail track,” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Ground Improvement, vol. 167, no. 1, pp. 24–34, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1680/grim.13.00018.

[8] H. Cetin, M. Fener, and O. Gunaydin, “Geotechnical properties of tire-cohesive clayey soil mixtures as a fill material,” Engineering Geology, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 110–120, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2006.09.002.

[9] S. Akbulut, S. Arasan, and E. Kalkan, “Modification of clayey soils using scrap tire rubber and synthetic fibers,” Applied Clay Science, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 23–32, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2007.02.001.

[10] T. Zafar, M.A. Ansari, and A. Husain, “Soil stabilization by reinforcing natural and synthetic fibers – A state of the art review,” Materials Today: Proceedings, early access, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.03.503.

[11] A.A. Mohamad Mazuki, H. Md Akil, S. Safiee, Z. Ishak, and A. Bakar, “Degradation of dynamic mechanical properties of pultruded kenaf fiber reinforced composites after immersion in various solutions,” Composites Part B: Engineering, vol. 42, pp. 71–76, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2010.08.004.

[12] N. Esmaeilpour Shirvani, A. Taghavi Ghalesari, M. Khaleghnejad Tabari, and A.Janalizadeh Choobbasti, “Improvement of the engineering behavior of sand-clay mixtures using kenaf fiber reinforcement,” Transportation Geotechnics, vol. 19, pp. 1–8, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2019.01.004.

[13] R. Munirwan, M. Munirwansyah, M. Marwan, R. Putra Jaya, and V. Kamchoom, “Performance of coir fiber addition for clay as a sub-grade for pavement design,” in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 712, p. 012009, pp. 1–8, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/712/1/012009.

[14] M.U. Maguesvari, P. Muthaiyan, and S. Yugasini, “Stabilization of soil using kenaf fibre and rice husk ash,” Materials Today: Proceedings, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.06.261.

[15] R. Abbasov, M. Fahs, A. Younes, H. Nowamooz, K. Jørgen Måløy, and R. Toussaint, “Modeling rainfall-induced landslide using the concept of local factor of safety: Uncertainty propagation and sensitivity analysis,” Computers and Geotechnics, vol. 167, p. 106102, pp. 1–22, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106102.

[16] X. Liu, and Y. Wang, “Quantifying impacts of precipitation scenarios projected under climate change on annual probability of rainfall-induced landslides at a specific slope,” Computers and Geotechnics, vol. 167, p. 106063, pp. 1–19, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.106063.

[17] Y. Lee, W.-H. Choi, and S.-C. Kim, “Slope monitoring system for nuclear power plants,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 347, pp. 86–94, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.03.019.

[18] H. Dou, R. Wang, H. Wang, and W. Jian, “Rainfall early warning threshold and its spatial distribution of rainfall-induced landslides in China,” Rock Mechanics Bulletin, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1–13 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rockmb.2023.100056.

[19] W-H. Zhou, X. Xu, and A. Garg, “Measurement of unsaturated shear strength parameters of silty sand and its correlation with unconfined compressive strength,” Measurement, vol. 93, pp. 351–358, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.07.049.

[20] S.M. Karunarathne, M. Dray, L. Popov, M. Butler, C. Pennington, and C.M. Angelopoulos, “A technological framework for data-driven IoT systems: Application on landslide monitoring,” Computer Communications, vol. 154, pp. 298–312, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2020.02.076.

[21] Geological Survey of Peninsular Malaysia (MyGEMS), “ Geological Map of Peninsular Malaysia,” Minerals and Geoscience Department Malaysia, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://mygems.jmg.gov.my/portal/apps/sites/#/mygems-awam/

[22] ASTM D6913-04, Standard test methods for particle-size distribution (gradation) of soils using sieve analysis. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: International, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1520/D6913-04R09E01.

[23] ASTM D4318-17, Standard test methods for liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of soils. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: International, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1520/D4318-17.

[24] ASTM D854-14, Standard test methods for specific gravity of soil solids by water pycnometer. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: International, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1520/D0854-14.

[25] ASTM D698-12(2021) , Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using standard effort (12,400 ft-lbf/ft3 (600 kn-m/m3)). West Conshohocken, PA, USA: International, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1520/D0698-12R21.

[26] ASTM D3080-04, Standard test method for direct shear test of soils under consolidated drained conditions. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: International, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1520/D3080-04.

[27] ASTM D5084-03, Standard test methods for measurement of hydraulic conductivity of saturated porous materials using a flexible wall permeameter. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: International, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1520/D5084-03.

[28] ASTM D1632-17, Standard practice for making and curing soil-cement compression and flexure test specimens in the laboratory. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: International, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1520/D1632-17.

[29] ASTM C109/C109M-20, Standard test method for compressive strength of hydraulic cement mortars (using 2-in. or [50-mm] cube specimens). West Conshohocken, PA, USA: International, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0109_C0109M-20.

[30] ASTM D1635/D1635M-19, Standard test method for flexural strength of soil-cement using simple beam with third-point loading. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: International, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1520/D1635_D1635M-19.

[31] D. Devasena, R. Ramya, D. Yuvaraj, S. Vivek, and T. Darshan, “IoT based water distribution system,” International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 132–135, 2019, https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.D6295.088619.

[32] H. Xu, F. Li, Y. Gao, and W. Wang, “Simultaneous measurement of tilt and acceleration based on FBG sensor,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 20, no. 24, pp. 14857–14864, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2020.3010851.

[33] R. Brinkgreve, WM. Swolfs, E. Engin, et al., “PLAXIS 2D Reference manual,” Delft University of Technology and PLAXIS bv the Netherlands, 2011.

[34] D.M. Potts, and L. Zdravkovic, Finite Element Analysis in Geotechnical Engineering: Application, London, UK: Thomas Telford Publishing, 2001

[35] M.M. Badr, and Q.S.M. Shafiqu, “Predicting the performance of retaining structure under seismic loads by PLAXIS software,” Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Materials, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1515/jmbm-2022-0251.

[36] C.-N. Liu, Y.-H. Ho, and J.-W. Huang, “Large scale direct shear tests of soil/PET-yarn geogrid interfaces,” Geotextiles and Geomembranes, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 19–30, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2008.03.002.

[37] L.D. Wesley,”Soil compaction,” in Fundamentals of soil mechanics for sedimentary and residual soils, Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2009, pp. 391-404

[38] R. Proctor, “The design and construction of rolled earth dams”, Engineering News Record, vol. 111, no. 9, pp. 245–248, 1933.

[39] D. Fredlund, and H. Rahardjo, “Measurement of shear strength parameters,” in Soil Mechanics for Unsaturated Soils, Wiley, 1993, pp. 260-296.

[40] S. Yang, R. Lohnes, and B. Kjartanson, “Mechanical properties of shredded tires,” Geotechnical Testing Journal, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 44–52, 2002, https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ11078J.

[41] A. Edinçliler, G. Baykal, and A. Saygılı, “Influence of different processing techniques on the mechanical properties of used tires in embankment construction,” Waste management, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1073–1080 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009.09.031.

[42] S. Youwai, and D.T. Bergado, “Strength and deformation characteristics of shredded rubber tire - sand mixtures,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 254–264, 2003, https://doi.org/10.1139/t02-104.

[43] D.P. Coduto, Geotechnical Engineering: Principles and Practices, New Delhi, Prentice Hall, 1999

[44] D.N. Humphrey, and T.C. Sandford, “Tire chips as lightweight subgrade fill and retaining wall backfill,” in Proceedings of the symposium on recovery and effective reuse of discarded materials and by-products for construction of highway facilities, 1993: US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, pp. 5–87.

[45] J.J. Tweedie, D.N. Humphrey, and T.C. Sandford, “Tire shreds as lightweight retaining wall backfill: active conditions,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, vol. 124, no. 11, pp. 1061–1070, 1998, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:11(1061).

[46] H. Hazarika, E. Kohama, and T. Sugano, “Underwater shake table tests on waterfront structures protected with tire chips cushion,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, vol. 134, no. 12, pp. 1706–1719, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:12(1706).

[47] M.A. Warith, E. Evgin, and P.A.S. Benson, “Suitability of shredded tires for use in landfill leachate collection systems,” Waste Management, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 967–979, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2004.08.004.

[48] H. Danso, D.B. Martinson, M. Ali, and J. Williams, “Effect of fibre aspect ratio on mechanical properties of soil building blocks,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 83, pp. 314–319, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.039.

[49] C. Prasad, E. Nambiar, and B. Abraham, “Plastic fibre reinforced soil blocks as a sustainable building material,” International Journal of Advancements in Research & Technology, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 42–45, 2012.

[50] S. Konda, S. Chinoori, B. Jangala, and P. Sharma, “An experimental study on the soil reinforced blocks,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 52, pp. 1068-1072, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.10.492

[51] J. Philip, “The theory of infiltration: 1. The infiltration equation and its solution,” Soil Science, vol. 83, no. 5, pp. 345–358, 1957.

[52] D.J. Varnes, “Slope movement types and processes,” Special report, vol. 176, no. 11, pp. 33, 1978.

[53] W. Bishop A, “The principal of effective stress,” Teknisk Ukeblad, vol. 39, pp. 859–863, 1959.

[54] G.W. Clough, and J.M. Duncan, “Finite element analyses of retaining wall behavior,” Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, vol. 97, no. 12, pp. 1657–1673, 1971, https://doi.org/10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001713.

[55] D.M. Potts, and A.B. Fourie, “The behaviour of a propped retaining wall: results of a numerical experiment,” Géotechnique, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 383–404, 1984, https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1984.34.3.383.

[56] R.J. Bathurst, and M.R. Simac, “Geosynthetic reinforced segmental retaining wall structures in North America”. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Geotextiles, Geomembranes and Related Products, Singapore, September 5-9, 1994, pp. 1, https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4738.8160.

[57] J. Dam, M. Van den Oever, and E. Keijsers, “Production process for high density high performance binderless boards from whole coconut husk,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 97–101, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2003.12.017.

[58] K. Moran, A. Gilbreath, M. Méndez, D. Lin, and R. Sutton, “Tire wear: Emissions estimates and market insights to inform monitoring design,” SFEI Contribution, vol. 1109, 2023.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Z. Zaki, N. N. Nik Daud, M. Z. Muhammad Zuraidi, A. I. Sahatim, and A. S. Muhammed, “Advanced retaining wall using reinforced soil block and rubber backfill incorporated IoT monitoring system”, Constr., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 113–126, Jun. 2026, doi: 10.15282/construction.v6i1.13691.