Strategic Identification of Flash Flood Risks in Malaysian Construction: Integrating Stakeholder Perspectives for Enhanced Resilience in Pre-Construction and Construction Phases

Authors

  • Mohammad Syamsyul Hairi Saad Faculty of Civil Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al Sultan Abdullah, 26300 Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia
  • Mohamad Idris Ali Faculty of Civil Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah, 26300 Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia
  • Putri Zulaiha Razi Faculty of Civil Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah, 26300 Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia
  • Noram Irwan Ramli Faculty of Civil Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah, 26300 Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia
  • Shu Ing Doh Faculty of Civil Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah, 26300 Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15282/construction.v5i1.12147

Keywords:

Flash Flood Risk, Stakeholder Perspectives, Flood Resilience Strategies, Urbanization and Flood Risks

Abstract

The Malaysian construction industry faces escalating challenges from flash floods, exacerbated by rapid urbanization and climate change. While geographic and infrastructural vulnerabilities are well-researched, a critical gap exists in understanding how construction-phase activities contribute to flood risks. This study addresses this gap by systematically identifying flash flood risks associated with the pre-construction and construction phases, offering industry professionals and policymakers actionable insights. Through semi-structured interviews with 29 key stakeholders, including project managers, engineers, and public authorities, this study applies thematic analysis to uncover three primary risk categories: (1) location risks, including inadequate stormwater management and topographic challenges, (2) pre-construction risks, such as project scale, site location, and offsite impacts, and (3) construction-phase risks, particularly poor scheduling, and failure to implement best management practices. The findings highlight that insufficient planning and mitigation during construction significantly heighten flood vulnerabilities, yet these factors are often overlooked in current practice. To address these challenges, this research proposes a comprehensive framework for integrating flood risk management into construction project planning and execution. Key recommendations include using sustainable construction techniques, such as permeable surfaces, bio-retention ponds, detention ponds, silt fences, and green infrastructure. For policymakers, the study calls for updated regulatory guidelines to enforce stricter flood resilience measures in construction projects. Through targeted solutions for industry experts and policymakers, this research strengthens Malaysia's construction industry, enabling safer, more sustainable growth in flood-prone areas.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] S. Eslamian and F. Eslamian (Eds.), Flood handbook: Impacts and management, CRC Press, 2022.

[2] P. N. Duy, L. Chapman, M. Tight, P. N. Linh, and L. V. Thuong, “Increasing vulnerability to floods in new development areas: evidence from Ho Chi Minh City,” International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 197–212, 2018.

[3] R. Bakr, D. Amin, and K. Gaber, “Guideline for Atlas flash floods,” Civil Engineering and Architecture, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 2108–2127, 2022.

[4] C. Luu, H. X. Tran, B. T. Pham, N. Al-Ansari, T. Q. Tran, N. Q. Duong, et al., “Framework of spatial flood risk assessment for a case study in quang binh province, Vietnam,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 1–17, 2020.

[5] P. T. Nastos, N. R. Dalezios, I. N. Faraslis, K. Mitrakopoulos, A. Blanta, M. Spiliotopoulos, et al., “Risk management framework of environmental hazards and extremes in Mediterranean ecosystems,” Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1935–1954, 2021.

[6] P. Bhusara, S. Dhivare, K. Patil, S. Chaudhari, P. Yadav, and M. Sharma, “Risk management on construction site,” International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science, vol. 8, pp. 638–645, 2023.

[7] S. Iqbal, R. M. Choudhry, K. Holschemacher, A. Ali, and J. Tamošaitienė, “Risk management in construction projects,” Technological and Economic Development of Economy, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 65–78, 2015.

[8] G. M. Dawod, M. N. Mirza, K. A. Al-Ghamdi, and R. A. Elzahrany, “Projected impacts of land use and road network changes on increasing flood hazards using a 4D GIS: A case study in Makkah metropolitan area, Saudi Arabia,” Arabian Journal of Geosciences, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1139–1156, 2014.

[9] N. Asselman, J. S. de Jong, D. Kroekenstoel, and S. Folkertsma, “The importance of peak attenuation for flood risk management, exemplified on the Meuse River, the Netherlands,” Water Security, vol. 15, p. 100114, 2022.

[10] M. A. Bari, L. Alam, M. M. Alam, L. F. Rahman, and J. Pereira, “Estimation of losses and damages caused by flash floods in the commercial area of Kajang, Selangor, Malaysia,” Arabian Journal of Geosciences, vol. 14, p. 1-9, 2021.

[11] N. Samsuri, R. A. Bakar, and T. Unjah, “Flash flood impact in Kuala Lumpur – Approach review and way forward,” International Journal of the Malay World and Civilisation, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 69–76, 2018.

[12] H. S. Rosmadi, M. F. Ahmed, M. B. Mokhtar, and C. K. Lim, “Reviewing challenges of flood risk management in Malaysia,” Water, vol. 15, no. 13, p. 2390, 2023.

[13] N. Rosedi and M. Y. Ishak, “Evaluation of the vulnerability and resilience towards urban flash floods in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia,” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 1144, no. 1, p. 012012, 2023.

[14] M. R. Ridzuan, J. R. Razali, S. Y. Ju, and N. A. S. Abd Rahman, “An Analysis of Malaysian Public Policy in Disaster Risk Reduction: An Endeavour of Mitigating the Impacts of Flood in Malaysia,” International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 2006–2021, 2022.

[15] M. B. Mokhtar and M. F. Ahmed, “Managing a road as a river to mitigate the impact of urban flash floods,” Journal of Flood Risk Management, vol. 15, no. 4, p. e12849, 2022.

[16] A. Saleh, A. Yuzir, N. Sabtu, S. K. M. Abujayyab, M. R. Bunmi, and Q. B. Pham, “Flash flood susceptibility mapping in urban area using genetic algorithm and ensemble method,” Geocarto International, vol. 37, no. 25, pp. 10199–10228, 2022.

[17] N. Z. A. Norizan, N. Hassan, and M. M. Yusoff, “Strengthening flood resilient development in Malaysia through integration of flood risk reduction measures in local plans,” Land Use Policy, vol. 102, p. 105178, 2021.

[18] M. Nurashikin, E. Rodger, and M. N. Rumaizah, “Reducing flooding impacts to the built environment: A literature review,” In MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 266, p. 02001, 2019.

[19] M. U. I. Choudhury and C. E. Haque, “‘We are more scared of the power elites than the floods’: Adaptive capacity and resilience of wetland community to flash flood disasters in Bangladesh,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 19, pp. 145–158, 2016.

[20] M. Mohsin, Y. Hengbin, Z. Luyao, L. Rui, Q. Chong, and A. Mehak, “An application of multiple-criteria decision analysis for risk prioritization and management: A case study of the fisheries sector in Pakistan,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 14, p. 8831, 2022.

[21] N. A. Mabahwi and H. Nakamura, “The issues and challenges of flood-related agencies in Malaysia,” Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, vol. 5, no. 13, pp. 285–290, 2020.

[22] H. Nasiri, M. J. Mohd Yusof, and T. A. Mohammad Ali, “An overview to flood vulnerability assessment methods,” Sustainable Water Resources Management, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 331–336, 2016.

[23] N. A. B. Mabahwi, H. Nakamura, and Y. Bhattacharya, “Flood risk management in Malaysia: The current hindrances for flood related agencies,” Asian Journal of Behavioural Studies, vol. 5, no. 19, pp. 11–24, 2020.

[24] M. Yusup, N. F. Abd Mutalib, M. A. Marzukhi, Y. A. Abdullah, and Z. A. Zaki, “Quality assessment of Development Proposal Report (Dpr) case study: Seremban City Council,” Planning Malaysia, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 360–373, 2022.

[25] S. Cotterill and L. J. Bracken, “Assessing the effectiveness of Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS): Interventions, impacts and challenges,” Water, vol. 12, no. 11, p. 3160, 2020.

[26] D. Kim, Y. Sun, D. Wendi, Z. Jiang, S. Y. Liong, and P. Gourbesville, “Flood modelling framework for Kuching City, Malaysia: Overcoming the lack of data,” In Advances in Hydroinformatics: SimHydro 2017-Choosing The Right Model in Applied Hydraulics, Springer Singapore, 2018, pp. 559–568.

[27] N. A. Mohd Sofberi and R. Zainal, “Decision making process practised at planning phase in Malaysia,” Malaysian Journal of Sustainable Environment, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 107, 2020.

[28] R. de Risi, F. Jalayer, F. De Paola, I. Iervolino, M. Giugni, M. E. Topa, et al., “Flood risk assessment for informal settlements,” Natural Hazards, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 1003–1032, 2013.

[29] R. Castaño-Rosa, S. Pelsmakers, H. Järventausta, J. Poutanen, L. Tähtinen, A. Rashidfarokhi, et al., “Resilience in the built environment: Key characteristics for solutions to multiple crises,” Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 87, p. 104259, 2022.

[30] C. Soranno, “Importance of risk assessment in the packaging industry,” Sick Sensor Intelligent, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2018, available: https://cdn.sick.com/media/content/h7a/hbc/9693013049374.pdf.

[31] L. Bertilsson, K. Wiklund, I. de Moura Tebaldi, O. M. Rezende, A. P. Veról, and M. G. Miguez, “Urban flood resilience – A multi-criteria index to integrate flood resilience into urban planning,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 573, pp. 970–982, 2019.

[32] J. P. Leitão, M. D. C. Almeida, N. E. Simões, and A. Martins, “Methodology for qualitative urban flooding risk assessment,” Water Science and Technology, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 829–838, 2013.

[33] K. Schröter, M. Barendrecht, M. Bertola, A. Ciullo, R. T. da Costa, L. Cumiskey, et al., “Large-scale flood risk assessment and management: Prospects of a systems approach,” Water Security, vol. 14, no. p. 100109, 2021.

[34] B. Russo, M. G. Valentín, and J. Tellez-álvarez, “The relevance of grated inlets within surface drainage systems in the field of urban flood resilience. A review of several experimental and numerical simulation approaches,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 13, p. 7189, 2021.

[35] Y.-S. Su, “Discourse, strategy, and practice of urban resilience against flooding,” Business and Management Studies, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 73, 2016.

[36] P. Patri, P. Sharma, and S. K. Patra, “Does economic development reduce disaster damage risk from floods in India? Empirical evidence using the ZINB model,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 79, p. 103163, 2022.

[37] A. – M. Manta, C. Dima, and M. N. Păcurari, “Risk management planning in a construction project,” Scientific Bulletin of the Politehnica University of Timişoara Transactions on Engineering and Management, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 20–28, 2023.

[38] N. Bhattacharya-Mis, J. Lamond, B. Montz, H. Kreibich, S. Wilkinson, F. Chan, et al., “Flood risk to commercial property: Training and education needs of built environment professionals,” International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, vol. 9, no. 4–5, pp. 385–401, 2018.

[39] F. Klijn, H. Kreibich, H. de Moel, and E. Penning-Rowsell, “Adaptive flood risk management planning based on a comprehensive flood risk conceptualisation,” Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 845–864, 2015.

[40] D. L. Y. Chuan and F. C. Ros, “Quantitative assessment of flood vulnerability in Malaysia,” In Community, Environment and Disaster Risk Management: Water Management and Sustainability in Asia, vol. 23, pp. 25-32, 2021.

[41] T. R. Bhuiyan, M. I. H. Reza, E. A. Choy, and J. J. Pereira, “Facts and trends of urban exposure to flash flood: A case of Kuala Lumpur city,” In Community, Environment and Disaster Risk Management: Improving Flood Management, Prediction and Monitoring, vol. 20, pp. 79–90, 2018.

[42] Z. A. Zaki, Y. A. Abdullah, M. Yusup and I. C. Abdullah, “Application of resilience model for flood management in local planning context,” Journal of Administrative Science, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 237–248, 2021.

[43] P. Mariappan, M. Z. Khairani and M. Chanthiran, “Design and Development Research (DDR) approaches in the development of koin-art cooperative learning model for student of inclusive education program,” KUPAS SENI: Jurnal Seni dan Pendidikan Seni, vol. 10, pp. 66–77, 2022.

[44] P. Z. Razi, M. I. Ali, and N. I. Ramli, “Exploring risk associated to public road infrastructure construction projects,” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 682, no. 1, p. 012030, 2021.

[45] S. A. Ahmad Basri, S. A. Syed Zakaria, T. A. Majid, and Z. Yusop, “Exploring awareness and application of disaster risk management cycle (DRMC) from stakeholder’s perspective,” International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 470–483, 2022.

[46] M. A. R. Shah, A. Rahman, and S. H. Chowdhury, “Challenges for achieving sustainable flood risk management,” Journal of Flood Risk Management, vol. 11, pp. S352–S358, 2018.

[47] I. Mohamad Yusoff, A. Ramli, N. A. Mhd Alkasirah, and N. Mohd Nasir, “Exploring the managing of flood disaster: A Malaysian perspective,” Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 24–36, 2018.

[48] H. Nasiri, M. J. M. Yusof, T. A. M. Ali, and M. K. B. Hussein, “District flood vulnerability index: urban decision-making tool,” International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 2249–2258, 2019.

[49] N. Fitriyati, H. S. Arifin, R. L. Kaswanto, and Marimin, “Flood resiliency approach for urban planning: Critical review and future research agenda,” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 1109, no. 1, p. 012009, 2022.

[50] F. Zhang, Y. Chen, W. Wang, C. Y. Jim, Z. Zhang, M. L. Tan, et al., “Impact of land-use/land-cover and landscape pattern on seasonal in-stream water quality in small watersheds,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 357, no. November 2021, p. 131907, 2022.

[51] L. Bosher, A. Dainty, P. Carrillo, J. Glass, and A. Price, “Integrating disaster risk management into construction: A UK perspective,” Building Research and Information, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 163–177, 2007.

[52] L. Bosher, A. Dainty, P. Carrillo, J. Glass, and A. Price, “Decision support for integrating disaster risk management strategies into construction practice,” The Association of Researchers in Construction Management (ARCOM) 2009, Proceeding of 25th Annual Conference, pp. 793–802, 2009.

[53] J. Bruen and J. P. Spillane, “Disasters and the built environment,” In Building Surveyor’s Pocket Book, pp. 252-275, 2021.

[54] United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, Disaster Risk Reduction in Malaysia: Status Report 2020, p. 34, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://www.undrr.org/publication/disaster-risk-reduction-india-status-report-2020

[55] P. Anthony, R. B. Abdul Majid, and N. I. Binti Tukiman, “A review of decision-making for pre floods resilience in housing,” International Journal of Applied Science and Research, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 116–129, 2022.

[56] M. A. R. Shah, A. Rahman, and S. H. Chowdhury, “Assessing sustainable development of flood mitigation projects using an innovative sustainability assessment framework,” Sustainable Development, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1404–1417, 2020.

[57] K. Puzyreva, Z Henning, R Schelwald, H Rassman, E Borgnino, P de Beus, et al., “Professionalization of community engagement in flood risk management: Insights from four European countries,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 71, p. 102811, 2022.

[58] R. Afsari, S. N. Shorabeh, M. Kouhnavard, M. Homaee, and J. J. Arsanjani, “A spatial decision support approach for flood vulnerability analysis in urban areas: A case study of Tehran,” ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, vol. 11, no. 7, p. 380, 2022.

[59] R. Bunmi Mudashiru, N. Sabtu, R. Abdullah, A. Saleh, and I. Abustan, “Optimality of flood influencing factors for flood hazard mapping: An evaluation of two multi-criteria decision-making methods,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 612, p. 128055, 2022.

[60] K. Reiter, N. Knittel, G. Bachner, and S. Hochrainer-Stigler, “Barriers and ways forward to climate risk management against indirect effects of natural disasters: A case study on flood risk in Austria,” Climate Risk Management, vol. 36, p. 100431, 2022.

[61] J. Kryspin-Wattson, “Land use planning for urban flood risk management,” Urban Floods Community of Practice Knowledge Notes, p. 28. 2017, [Online]. Available: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/-10986/26654%0Ahttps://www.gfdrr.org/sites/default/files/publication/UFCOPKnowledgeNoteMay.pdf

[62] V. Ahmed, A. Opoku, and Z. Aziz (Eds.), Research methodology in the built environment: A selection of case studies, Routledge, 2016.

[63] P. Bubeck, L. Berghäuser, P. Hudson, and A. H. Thieken, “Using panel data to understand the dynamics of human behavior in response to flooding,” Risk Analysis, vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 2340–2359, 2020.

[64] P. Robinson, “Designing and conducting mixed methods research,” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, vol. 31, no. 4, p. 388, 2007.

[65] M. Ishtiaq, “Book Review J. W. Creswell, (2014), Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage,” English Language Teaching, vol. 12, no. 5, p. 40, 2019.

[66] G. Monyane, Fidelis Emuze, B. Awuzie, and G. Crafford, “Evaluating a collaborative cost management framework with lean construction experts,” In The 10th International Conference on Engineering, Project, and Production Management pp. 311–320, 2020.

[67] T. O. Aduloju, “Participation of construction professionals in the environmental impact assessment of heavy engineering projects,” The Asian Review of Civil Engineering, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 8–15, 2023.

[68] C. Poleacovschi and A. Javernick-Will, “Who are the experts? Assessing expertise in construction and engineering organizations,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 143, no. 8, pp. 1–9, 2017.

[69] I. Etikan, “Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling,” American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 1, 2016.

[70] A. F. Mubarak, R. Amiruddin, and S. Gaus, “The effectiveness of disaster prevention and mitigation training for the students in disaster prone areas,” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 235, no. 1, pp. 4–10, 2019.

[71] F. Fofana, P. Bazeley, and A. Regnault, “Applying a mixed methods design to test saturation for qualitative data in health outcomes research,” PLoS One, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1–12, 2020.

[72] S. L. Faulkner and S. P. Trotter, “Theoretical saturation,” The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 137–152, 2017.

[73] C. O. Moura, Í. R. Silva, T. P. Silva, K. A. Santos, M. C. A. Crespo and M. M. Silva, “Methodological path to reach the degree of saturation in qualitative research: Grounded theory,” Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 2–9, 2022.

[74] V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77-101, 2006.

[75] N. Chasanah, I. Gunawan, and B. Baroudi, “International development project success: A literature review,” Journal of International Development, vol. 36, pp. 1–26, 2023.

[76] A. A. S. Muthuveeran, O. M. Tahir, M. A. Hassan, and I. Yin, “Investigating the current risk management process practice in Malaysian landscape planning projects,” Planning Malaysia, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 48–63, 2022.

[77] M. Vaismoradi and S. Snelgrove, “Theme in qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis,” Forum: Qualitative Social Research / Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, vol. 20, no. 3, 2019.

[78] P. J. Ward, M. C. de Ruiter, J. Mård, K. Schröter, A. Van Loon, T. Veldkamp, et al., “The need to integrate flood and drought disaster risk reduction strategies,” Water Security, vol. 11, p. 100070, 2020.

[79] Q. Lodder and J. Slinger, “The ‘Research for Policy’ cycle in Dutch coastal flood risk management: The Coastal Genesis 2 research programme,” Ocean & Coastal Management, vol. 219, p. 106066, 2022.

[80] F. Taromideh, R. Fazloula, B. Choubin, A. Emadi, and R. Berndtsson, “Urban flood-risk assessment: Integration of decision-making and machine learning,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 8, p. 4483, 2022.

[81] U.H. M. Sufiyan and M. R. Mahmud, “44% of the flash flood in Klang Valley occurred coincidentally during the typhoon period: A review on 2015,” In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 1135, no. 1, p. 012016, 2023.

[82] P. Hudson, P. Raška, J. Macháč, and L. Slavíková, “Balancing the interaction between urban regeneration and flood risk management – A cost benefit approach in Ústí nad Labem,” Land Use Policy, vol. 120, p. 106276, 2022.

[83] F. K. S. Chan, Z. Wang, J. Chen, X. Lu, T. Nafea, B. Montz, et al., “Selected global flood preparation and response lessons: implications for more resilient Chinese Cities,” Natural Hazards, vol. 118, no. 3, pp. 1767–1796, 2023.

[84] A. B. Hipeny, N. A. Ramli and N. B. I. Rasli, “Procedural effects on controlling natural disasters (landslides and flash floods) based on environmental degradation from development in Malaysia,” International Journal of Engineering and Management Research, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 189–196, 2022.

[85] I. U. Kaoje, M. Z. Abdul Rahman, N. H. Idris, K. A. Razak, W. N. M. Wan Mohd Rani, T. H. Tam, et al., “Physical flood vulnerability assessment using geospatial indicator‐based approach and participatory analytical hierarchy process: A case study in Kota Bharu, Malaysia,” Water (Switzerland), vol. 13, no. 13, pp. 1–22, 2021.

[86] U.H. M. Sufiyan and M. R. Mahmud, “44% of the flash flood in Klang Valley occurred coincidentally during the typhoon period: A review on 2015,” In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 1135, no. 1, p. 012016, 2023.

[87] S. N. A. Mohamad Zulkifli, A. A. Kadar Hamsa, N. M. Noor, and M. Ibrahim, “Evaluation of land use density, diversity and ridership of rail based public transportation system,” Transportation Research Procedia, vol. 25, pp. 5266–5281, 2017.

[88] N. A. Zakaria, A. A. Ghani, R. Abdullah, L. M. Sidek, A. H. Kassim and A. Ainan, “MSMA- A new urban stormwater management manual for Malaysia,” Advances in Hydroscience, vol. 6, pp. 1–10, 2014.

[89] N. A. Zulhisham and E. S. S. Sadek, “Employing the Flash Flood Potential Index (FFPI) with physical environmental factors in Baling, Kedah through GIS analysis,” International Journal of Geoinformatics, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 19–29, 2023.

[90] Construction Research Institute of Malaysia (CREAM), Manual for flood risk assessment and flood vulnerability index for critical infrastructure (Ci) in Malaysia, 2021.

[91] Construction Research Institute of Malaysia (CREAM), Development of flood risk vulnerability index (FVI) for critical infrastructure in Malaysia, 2022.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-02

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

[1]
M. S. H. Saad, M. I. Ali, P. Z. Razi, N. I. Ramli, and S. I. Doh, “Strategic Identification of Flash Flood Risks in Malaysian Construction: Integrating Stakeholder Perspectives for Enhanced Resilience in Pre-Construction and Construction Phases”, Constr., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 39–55, May 2025, doi: 10.15282/construction.v5i1.12147.

Similar Articles

11-15 of 15

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.