Development of laser cleaning state classification model through the acquired acoustic signal using the empirical mode decomposition and one dimensional convolutional neural network
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15282/jmes.19.3.2025.9.0847Keywords:
Laser Cleaning, Acoustic Signal, Empirical Mode Decomposition, 1D-CNN, ClassificationAbstract
Laser cleaning is an efficient, non-invasive method that utilizes high-energy laser beams to eliminate contaminants. However, variations in laser process parameters can lead to challenges such as inconsistent cleaning depth, thermal damage, and uneven surface treatment, ultimately compromising the quality of the cleaned surface. To address these issues, developing a predictive model for cleaning states is crucial to enhance online monitoring systems, enabling earlier detection of potential problems. This manuscript outlined the development of a classification model intended for predicting the states of laser cleaning by employing the EMD-1DCNN methodology. The primary objective of integrating Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) is to enhance the precision and reliability of the model generated from a one-dimensional Convolutional Neural Network (1D-CNN). The laser cleaning experiments were executed at velocities of 100 mm/s and 300 mm/s on corroded boron steel substrates. Acoustic signals within the frequency spectrum of 20 Hz to 10,000 Hz were systematically recorded during the entirety of the cleaning procedure.These signals were categorized into three phases, which were corrosion removal stage, low roughness formation, and engraving stage, which indicates the surface damage. The results show that the time-domain signal recorded a random non-linear pattern during the corrosion removal stage. The frequency was active at 6300 Hz for all laser cleaning conditions, but the peak amplitude decreased as the grooves started to form on the cleaned area. Instead, the peak at 1800 Hz was increased. However, the implementation of EMD revealed a significant trend that could separate corrosion removal and groove formation stage at another bandwidth, which was 20 Hz to 500 Hz. Moreover, the EMD-1D-CNN classification model achieved an average accuracy of 95.75% with a deviation of 1.99%, demonstrating enhanced performance compared to a model developed without EMD. This research highlights the importance of the classification model in predicting cleaning process stages, facilitating real-time monitoring and ensuring cleaning quality. The preprocessing methods employed not only enhanced model accuracy but also improved consistency, potentially reducing computational demands while fostering a stable model.
References
[1] Z. Zhou, W. Sun, J. Wu, H. Chen, F. Zhang, et al., “The fundamental mechanisms of laser cleaning technology and its typical applications in industry,” Processes, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 1445-1462, 2023.
[2] G. Zhu, Z. Xu, Y. Jin, X. Chen, L. Yang, et al., “Mechanism and application of laser cleaning: A review,” Optics and Lasers in Engineering, vol. 157, p. 107130, 2022.
[3] G. Zhang, X. Hua, Y. Huang, Y. Zhang, F. Li, et al., “Investigation on mechanism of oxide removal and plasma behavior during laser cleaning on aluminum alloy,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 506, p. 144666, 2020.
[4] T. Shi, C. Wang, G. Mi, F. Yan, “A study of microstructure and mechanical properties of aluminum alloy using laser cleaning,” Journal of Manufacturing Processes, vol. 42, pp. 60-66, 2019.
[5] L. Zhichao, D. Zhang, X. Su, S. Yang, J. Xu, et al., "Removal mechanism of surface cleaning on TA15 titanium alloy using nanosecond pulsed laser," Optics & Laser Technology, vol. 139, p. 106998, 2021.
[6] Z. Tian, Z. Lei, X. Chen, Y. Chen, Y, “Evaluation of laser cleaning for defouling of marine biofilm contamination on aluminum alloys,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 499, p. 144060, 2020.
[7] H. J. Yoo, S. Baek, J. H. Kim, J. Choi, Y. J. Kim, et al., “Effect of laser surface cleaning of corroded 304L stainless steel on microstructure and mechanical properties,” Journal of Materials Research and Technology, vol. 16, pp. 373-385, 2022.
[8] Z. Li, S. Wang, W. Zheng, Y. Wang, Y. Pan, “A review of dynamic monitoring technology and application research of laser cleaning interface,” Measurement, vol. 238, p. 115311, 2024.
[9] Y. Chen, G. Deng, Q. Zhou, & G. Feng, “Acoustic signal monitoring in laser paint cleaning,” Laser Physics, vol. 30, no. 6, p. 066001, 2020.
[10] G. J. Tserevelakis, J. S. Pozo-Antonio, P. Siozos, T. Rivas, P. Pouli, et al., “On-line photoacoustic monitoring of laser cleaning on stone: Evaluation of cleaning effectiveness and detection of potential damage to the substrate,” Journal of Cultural Heritage, vol. 35, pp. 108-115, 2019.
[11] G. J. Tserevelakis, P. Pouli, G. Zacharakis, “Listening to laser light interactions with objects of art: A novel photoacoustic approach for diagnosis and monitoring of laser cleaning interventions,” Heritage Science, vol. 8, pp. 1-13, 2020.
[12] X. Xie, Q. Huang, J. Long, Q. Ren, W. Hu, et al., “A new monitoring method for metal rust removal states in pulsed laser derusting via acoustic emission techniques,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 275, p. 116321, 2020.
[13] Z. W. Lim, M. F. M. Yusof, M. Quazi, M. A. Halil, M. Ishak, “Monitoring laser cleaning process using acoustic signal,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 2998, no. 1, p. 070001, 2024.
[14] A. Stallone, A. Cicone, M. Materassi, “New insights and best practices for the successful use of Empirical Mode Decomposition, Iterative Filtering and derived algorithms,” Scientific reports, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 15161, 2020.
[15] M. Barbosh, P. Singh, A. Sadhu, “Empirical mode decomposition and its variants: A review with applications in structural health monitoring,” Smart Materials and Structures, vol. 29, no. 9, p. 093001, 2020.
[16] N. E. Huang, Z. Shen, S. R. Long, M. C. Wu, H. H. Shih, et al., “The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis,” in Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: mathematical, physical and engineering sciences, vol. 454, no. 1971, pp. 903-995, 1998.
[17] J. Xu, Z. Sun, W. Zhou, “Research on the real-time monitoring technology of the laser rust removal process,” Journal Photon, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 1090–1092, 2002.
[18] J. Zheng, M. Su, W. Ying, J. Tong, Z. Pan, “Improved uniform phase empirical mode decomposition and its application in machinery fault diagnosis,” Measurement, no. 179, p. 109425, 2021.
[19] J. Gu, F. Meng, H. Li, H. Li, C. Deng, “Seaplane motion prediction based on EMD-CNN-GRU coupled modeling,” in International Conference on Algorithms, High Performance Computing, and Artificial Intelligence (AHPCAI 2024), vol. 13403, pp. 240-248, 2024.
[20] J. Lu, D. Liu, X. C. Cheng, L. Wei, A. Hu, et al., “An efficient unstructured sparse convolutional neural network accelerator for wearable ECG classification device,” in IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I-Regular Papers, vol. 69, pp. 4572–4582, 2022.
[21] X. B. Jin, N. X. Yang, X. Y. Wang, Y. T. Bai, T. L. Su, et al., “Deep hybrid model based on EMD with classification by frequency characteristics for long-term air quality prediction,” Mathematics, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 214, 2020.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 The Author(s)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

