Experimental investigation of traction forces in Touyoura sand using a C-shaped grouser

Authors

  • Mochamad Edoward Ramadhan Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, University of Jember, Jember 68121, Indonesia , Universitas Jember image/svg+xml
  • Ahmad Najmuddin Ibrahim Faculty of Manufacturing and Mechatronic Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al Sultan Abdullah, Pekan Campus 26600, Pahang, Malaysia , Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah image/svg+xml
  • Yasuhiro Fukuoka Department of Mechanical System Engineering, Ibaraki University College of Engineering, Ibaraki University Hitachi 316-8511, Japan , Ibaraki University image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9289-0132

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15282/mekatronika.v8i1.13853

Keywords:

Planetary rover, Traction force, C-shaped grouser, Wheel-terrain interaction, Toyoura sand

Abstract

Exploration rovers on Mars and the Moon frequently encounter wheel entrapment in loose terrain due to insufficient traction, which compromises mobility and mission success. Enhancing wheel traction is critical, and the integration of grousers has been empirically demonstrated to improve performance through complex wheel–terrain and grouser–terrain interactions. Traditional measurement methods, such as the bevameter, are designed for heavy vehicles and are less suitable for lightweight planetary rovers. This study introduces a simplified traction measurement prototype utilizing a static shaft connected to a 5-kg load cell and a C-shaped grouser with a width of 90 mm and a physical height of 150 mm with an effective immersion length of 100 mm. During experimental trials, the prototype penetrated Toyoura sand as the wheel advanced, enabling direct traction measurement over a distance of 170 mm. Results indicate that clockwise rotation with the lateral side facing forward generates a traction force of 20.3 N, while a backward orientation yields 22.7 N. The average traction force per grouser cycle ranges from 20.11 to 22.90 N, with a mean of 21.5 N and a standard deviation of 1.3, confirming high reproducibility. The effective attack angle was determined to be 140.16°, facilitating gradual soil shear mobilization without inducing excessive sinkage. These findings suggest that while grouser orientation influences peak forces, the differences remain relatively minor, with the lateral sides primarily serving as structural reinforcement for the C-shaped geometry.

References

[1] Kubota T, Iizuka K, Nakane Y. Experimental study of wheel traction performance for planetary rovers with grousers. Journal of Terramechanics. 2003;40:123–135.

[2] Ishigami G, Miwa A, Nagatani K, Yoshida K. Terramechanics-based model for steering maneuver of planetary exploration rovers on loose soil. Journal of Field Robotics. 2007;24(3):233–250. https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.20187

[3] Nakashima Y, Fujii H, Oida A, Momozu M, Kanamori H, Aoki S, et al. Discrete element method analysis of single wheel performance for a small lunar rover on sloped terrain. Journal of Terramechanics. 2010;47(5):307–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2010.04.001

[4] Irani F, Bauer RJ, Waller JP. A dynamic terramechanics model for rigid wheels with grousers on sandy soil. Journal of Terramechanics. 2011;48:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2011.05.001

[5] Sutoh M, Nagaoka K, Nagatani K, Yoshida K. Influence of wheel parameters on mobility of planetary rovers on loose soil. Journal of Terramechanics. 2012;49:345–353. https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.21405

[6] Sutoh M, Nagaoka K, Nagatani K, Yoshida K. Design of wheels with grousers for planetary rovers traveling over loose soil. Journal of Terramechanics. 2013;50(5–6):345–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2013.05.002

[7] Zhou F, Arvidson RE, Bennett K, Trease B, Lindemann R, Bellutta P, et al. Simulations of Mars rover traverses. Journal of Field Robotics. 2014;31(1):141–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.21483

[8] Higa K, Moreland S, Skonieczny K, Wettergreen D. Measurement of two-dimensional normal stress distribution on a rigid wheel. Journal of Terramechanics. 2015;62:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2015.04.001

[9] Du J, Hou J, Dun Y, et al. Influence of wheel width on drawbar pull under different slip ratios. Journal of Terramechanics. 2018;76:45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2018.04.005

[10] Jiang H, Gao X, Liu Y, et al. Validation of a physical wheel model using discrete element method simulations and lunar soil simulant. Advances in Space Research. 2018;62:1801–1812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2017.12.001

[11] Higa K, Skonieczny K, Wettergreen D. Grousers dominate traction generation for rigid wheels on sand. Journal of Terramechanics. 2019;85:39–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2019.07.001

[12] Inotsume H, Moreland S, Skonieczny K, Wettergreen D. Effects of grouser parameters under longitudinal and lateral slip conditions. Journal of Terramechanics. 2019;85:59–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2019.06.002

[13] Ibrahim AN, Aoshima S, Shiroma N, Fukuoka Y. The effect of assistive anchor-like grousers on wheeled rover performance over unconsolidated sandy dune inclines. Sensors. 2016;16(9):1507. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16091507

[14] Ibrahim AN, Fukuoka Y. Effect of assistive grouser mechanism on lightweight rover power consumption pattern on steep soft sand inclines. In: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Singapore: Springer; 2018. p. 331–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8788-2_30

[15] Sabarudin SS, Ibrahim AN, Fukuoka Y. Effect of grouser angle of attack on performance of adjustable robot wheel assistive grouser. In: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Singapore: Springer; 2020. p. 1111–1117. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0950-6_92

[16] Aziz INAC, Ibrahim AN, Basri I, Fukuoka Y. Rover wheel assistive grouser angle of attack effects on traction force in soft terrain. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Colloquium on Signal Processing and Its Applications (CSPA); 2023, Malaysia. Piscataway (NJ): IEEE; 2023. p. 236–241. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSPA57446.2023.10087721

[17] Aziz INAC, Ibrahim AN, Basri I, Fukuoka Y. Rover wheel assistive grouser shape effects on traction force in flat soft terrain. In: Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Conference on Automatic Control and Intelligent Systems (I2CACIS); 2023, Malaysia. Piscataway (NJ): IEEE; 2023. p. 281–286. https://doi.org/10.1109/I2CACIS57635.2023.10193664

[18] Basri I, Aziz INAC, Ibrahim AN, Fukuoka Y. Investigation of wheel robot grouser width parameter effect on robot mobility in soft sand terrain using sand test bed. In: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Singapore: Springer; 2024. p. 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8819-8_16

[19] Takehana K, Kizaki S, Tanaka T, Uno K, Yoshida K. Comparison of lunar rover wheel performance in soils with different cohesive properties. Journal of Terramechanics. 2025;117:101011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2024.101011

[20] Dong X, Jin J, Jia Z, Qi Y, Chen T, He L, et al. Soil-plowing wheel with C-shaped grousers for enhanced drawbar pull on sandy terrain. Journal of Terramechanics. 2025;118:101045. https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jterra.2024.101002

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

Issue

Section

Research Article

How to Cite

[1]
M. E. Ramadhan, A. N. Ibrahim, and Y. Fukuoka, “Experimental investigation of traction forces in Touyoura sand using a C-shaped grouser”, Mekatronika : J. Intell. Manuf. Mechatron., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 43–49, Jun. 2026, doi: 10.15282/mekatronika.v8i1.13853.

Share