PROTECTING ORIGIN AND CULTURE: GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATONS IN MALAYSIA, INDONESIA AND THAILAND

Authors

  • Al Hanisham Mohd Khalid School of Law, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010, Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4783-4892
  • Yuhanif Yusof School of Law, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010, Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia
  • Ahmad Masum Faculty of Law, Universiti Isla.m Sultan Sharif Ali, Spg 347, Jalan Pasar Gadong, Universiti Islam Sultan Sharif Ali, Spg 347, BE 1310 Negara Brunei Darussalam
  • Mohd Zakhiri Md. Nor Islamic Business School, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010, Sintok, Kedah Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15282/ijhtc.v10i2.12987

Keywords:

Geographical Indications, Traditional Cultural Expressions, Intellectual Property, Comparative IP Law, Cultural Legal Governance

Abstract

This article interrogates how Geographical Indications (GIs) can function as juridical devices for protecting origin-linked products and sustaining cultural practices in Malaysia, Indonesia, and Thailand. Anchored in a doctrinal-comparative approach, it addresses three research problems: (i) whether existing GI statutes and subsidiary instruments adequately secure the interests of indigenous and local communities; (ii) what structural and institutional asymmetries persist in registration, governance, and enforcement; and (iii) how far ASEAN-level coordination of GI standards can be pursued without eroding plural legal and cultural orders. Drawing on positivist legal analysis, complemented by critical postcolonial insights, the study examines legislative texts, administrative practice, and reported disputes to trace the evolution of GI regimes and their socio-legal effects in rural and agrarian economies. The inclusion of Thailand alongside Malaysia and Indonesia renders a more differentiated understanding of regional trajectories and the strategic uses of GIs by state and non-state actors. The analysis suggests that GIs retain significant potential to facilitate economic redress and cultural endurance but that their implementation remains uneven, with benefits often captured by powerful intermediaries rather than small-scale producers. Regulatory lacunae, fragile enforcement, and constrained community participation reinforce these imbalances. The article concludes by advancing proposals for calibrated reform, including plurilateral ASEAN policy alignment, community-driven certification architectures, and rights-based safeguards, to recalibrate GI law as a more equitable mechanism for the protection of origin and culture within the region.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Addor, F. & Grazioli, A. (2002). Geographical indications beyond wines and spirits: A roadmap for better protection for geographical indications in the WTO TRIPS agreement. Journal of World Intellectual Property, 5(6), 865.

Alavoine-Mornas, F. (1997). Fruit and vegetables of typical local areas: Consumers’ perception and valorization strategies through distributors and producers. In F. Arfini & C. Mora (Eds.), 52nd Seminar of the European Association of Agricultural Economists (EAAE), Parma, Italy, 317–329.

Albisu, L. M. (2002). Work Programme 2: Link between origin labelled products and local production systems, supply chain analysis (Final report, July 2002). DOLPHINS Concerted Action, European Commission. http://food.origin-for-sustainability.org/pdf/wp2/wp2-1.pdf

Andieni, R. A., & Allagan, T. M. P. (2024). Perlindungan indikasi geografis produk biji kopi luwak arabika Indonesia dari Jawa, Sumatera dan Sulawesi di Amerika Serikat. Bina Hukum Lingkungan, 8(2), 107-135.

Angkasith, P. (2002). Coffee production status and potential of organic Arabica coffee in Thailand. AU Journal of Technology, 5(3). https://www.thaiscience.info/journals/Article/AUJT/10290457.pdf

Ansari, M. D. W. (2024). Preserving the cultural heritage: The significance of protecting basmati rice as a GI product for Pakistan and India in international trade. Islamabad Law Review, 8(1), 106-141.

ASEAN (1995). ASEAN Framework Agreement on Intellectual Property Cooperation Bangkok, Thailand, 15 December 1995. Retrieve from [https://asean.org/asean-framework-agreement-on-intellectual-property-cooperation-bangkok-thailand-15-december-1995/] Last accessed on 10 May 2025.

Barjolle, D., & Sylvander, B. (2002). Some factors of success for “origin labelled products” in agro-food supply chains in Europe: Market, internal resources and institutions. Économies et Sociétés, 36(9–10), 1441–1462

Bérard, L., & Marchenay, P. (2006). Local products and geographical indications: Taking account of local knowledge and biodiversity. International Social Science Journal, 58(187), 109-116.

Berenguer, J. (2004). Consumer valuation of European quality labelled beef: An application to the Spanish market. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 31(3), 355-375.

Boisvert, V. (2006). From the conservation of genetic diversity to the promotion of quality foodstuff: Can the French model of AOC be exported? CAPRi working paper no. 49. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). http://archive.abs-biotrade.info/uploads/media/From_Conservation_to_Quality_Products_-_Valerie_Boisvert.pdf

Bowen, S. (2010). Development from within? The potential for geographical indications in the global south. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 13(2), 231-252.

Bramley, C. (2011). Geographical Indications in the ASEAN Region: A Legal Framework for Enhancing Trade and Investment in Local Produce. The John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law, 10, 236.

Canavari, M., Galanti, G., Haas, R., & Wongprawmas, R. (2010). Geographical indications: Outlook on the European and Thai systems and overview of EU gatekeepers perceptions towards GI fruit and coffee products proceeding from Thailand.

CIRAD (2009). The Challenges Relating to Geographical Indications (Gis) For ACP Countries. A Joint CTA, AFD and CIRAD workshop report, Montpellier, 24-27 March 2009.

Coombe, R. J., Ives, S., & Huizenga, D. (2014). Geographical indications: The promise, perils and politics of protecting place-based products. Sage handbook on intellectual property, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications, 207-223.

Cooray, M., Chern, L. J., & Azmana, J. J. B. (2023). A Discourse on the Malaysian Geographical Indications Act. Sriwijaya Law Review,7(2), 368-383.

Cottier, T. (2005). The agreement on trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights. In The World Trade Organization: Legal, Economic and Political Analysis (pp. 1041-1120). Boston, MA: Springer US.

Dagne, T. W. (2010). Harnessing the development potential of geographical indications for traditional knowledge-based agricultural products. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 5(6), 441-458.

Dewi, N. L. M. I. M., Putra, I. P. I. P., & Astama, I. K. (2022). The study of added value analysis of coffee processing in Indonesia. Agribusiness Journal, 5(2), 71-78.

Doi Chaang Coffee (2003), Legend of Doi Chaang Coffee. Retrieve from [https://doichaangcoffee.co.th/en/about-us/the-legend/] last accessed on 10 Aug 2025.

E.U. (2015) Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1135 of 9 July 2015 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (กาแฟดอยตช้าง (Kafae Doi Chaang) (PGI)) retrieve from [https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32015R1135&qid=-1754886585401] last accessed on 10 Aug 2025.

E.U. International IP Cooperation (n.d.). Law of The Republic of Indonesia Number 20 Of 2016. Retrieve from [https://internationalipcooperation.eu/sites/default/files/arise-docs/2019/Indonesia_Law-on-Marks-and-Geographical-Indications-20-2016.pdf] . Last accessed on 10 Aug 2025.

Entebang, H., Wong, S. K., & Mercer, Z. J. A. (2020). Development and performance of the pepper industry in Malaysia: A critical review. International Journal of Business & Society, 21(3), 1402-1423.

European Commission. (2025). EU Geographical Indications. Retrieved from [https://europa.eu/youreurope/-business/running-business/intellectual-property/geographical-indications/index_en.htm] Last accessed on 10 August 2025.

Gangjee, D. (2012). Relocating the law of geographical indications (Vol. 15). Cambridge University Press.

Malaysia. (2022). Geographical Indications Act 2022 (Act 836). https://www.myipo.gov.my/wp-content/uploads/-2025/02/Geographical-Indications-2022-Act-836.pdf

Gervais, D. J. (1998). The TRIPS Agreement: Drafting history and analysis. Sweet & Maxwell.

Gopalakrishnan NS, Nair PS and Babu AK (2007). Exploring the relationship between geographical indications and traditional knowledge: An analysis of the legal tools for the protection of geographical indications in Asia. ICTSD Working Paper, August.

Hajdukiewicz, A. (2014). European union agri-food quality schemes for the protection and promotion of geographical indications and traditional specialities: An economic perspective. Folia Horticulturae, 26(1), 3-17.

Harding, D., Lukman, K. M., Palar, M. R. A., & Kohsaka, R. (2025). Geographical indication in Indonesia: A review on the spatial distribution and classification of geographical indication‐registered products and‐related publications. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 28(1), 263-285.

Hayes, D., Reardon, T., & Hazell, P. (2003). Developing Country Super Market Development: Implications for Agrifood Systems and Rural Economies. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 54(2), 421-451.

Jena PR and Grote U (2010). Changing institutions to protect regional heritage: A case for geographical indications in the indian agrifood sector. Development Policy Review, 28(2).

Kaplinsky R and Fitter R (2001). Who gains from product rents as the coffee market becomes more differentiated? A value chain analysis. Institute of Development Studies (IDS) Working paper, 32(3).

Kelly, M., Yutthaphonphinit, P., Seubsman, S. A., & Sleigh, A. (2012). Development policy in Thailand: From top-down to grass roots. Asian Social Science, 8(13), 29.

King, J. H., Omar, L., Daud, A., Khadijah, B., Leong, S. S., & Ong, K. H. (2022). Challenges Threatening the Profitability of Pepper (Piper nigrum) Farmers: A Case Study at Lebu Kulit, Sungai Asap, Belaga, Sarawak. In Conference on Food and Industrial Crops (p. 58).

Law No. 20/2016 on Marks and Geographical Indications, Indonesia.

Lilavanichakul, A. (2019). PGI Doi Chaang Coffee in Thailand. In Sustainability of European Food Quality Schemes: Multi-Performance, Structure, and Governance of PDO, PGI, and Organic Agri-Food Systems (pp. 287-302). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Lisbon Agreement for the Protection of Appellations of Origin and Their International Registration of 31 October 1958, as revised at Stockholm on 14 July 1967. (1958). World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO).

Mansuy, J. (2021).Geographical indications and the EU legal and policy discourse: A pursuit of legitimacy? (Doctoral dissertation, University of Warwick).

Marie‐Vivien, D. (2020). Protection of Geographical Indications in ASEAN countries: Convergences and challenges to awakening sleeping Geographical Indications. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 23(3-4), 328-349.

Mas Rahmah. (2015). Geographical Indication: Its Potential for the Agricultural Sector in Malaysia. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 23, 527.

Moschini, G., Menapace, L., & Pick, D. (2008). Geographical Indications and The Competitive Provision of Quality in Agricultural Markets. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 90(3), 794-812.

Noppakoonwong, U., Khomarwut, C., Hanthewee, M., Jarintorn, S., Hassarungsee, S., Meesook, S., ... & Várzea, V. M. P. (2014, September). Research and development of Arabica coffee in Thailand. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Coffee Science (ASIC), Armenia, Colombia (pp. 8-13).

Pacciani, A., Belletti, G., Marescotti, A., & Scaramuzzi, S. (2001, June). The role of typical products in fostering rural development and the effects of regulation (EEC) 2081/92. In Policy Experiences with Rural Development in a Diversified Europe. 73rd EAAE Seminar, Ancona, Italy. (pp. 28-30).

Rahmah, M. (2018). The protection of geographical indication for agricultural development: Challenges For ASEAN.

Rangnekar, D. (2004). The socio-economics of geographical indications. UNCTAD-ICTSD Project on IPRs and Sustainable Development, Issue Paper, 8, 13-15.

Rangnekar, D. (2004A). The socio‐economics of geographical indications, A review of empirical evidence from Europe. UNCTAD/ICTSD Capacity Building Project on Intellectual Property Rights and Sustainable Development, UNTAD, 52, 46.

Reviron, S., Sylvander, B., & Barjolle, D. (2009). Geographical indications, public goods, and sustainable development: The roles of actors' strategies and public policies. In The Socio-Economics Of Origin-Labelled Products in Agri-Food Supply Chains: Spatial, Institutional and Co-Ordination Aspects. FAO. (pp. 321-339).

Thailand (2003). Geographical Indications Protection Act B.E. 2546. Retrieve from [https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/legislation/details/6811] last accessed on 10 Aug 2025.

Török, Á., Jantyik, L., Maró, Z. M., & Moir, H. V. J. (2020). Understanding the real-world impact of geographical indications: A critical review of the empirical economic literature. Sustainability, 12(22), 9434.

Tran, N. (2005). Brand building and The Vietnamese agricultural product. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 8(3), 47-58.

Tripathi, V. (2024). Analyzing the role of legal protection for trademarks and geographical indications in preserving cultural heritage and enhancing global trade. Journal of Law and Intellectual Property Rights, 1(1), 50-63.

TRIPS (1994). Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, Apr. 15, 1994, Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex 1C, 1869 U.N.T.S. 299, 33 I.L.M. 1197 (1994).

Vandergeest, P., & Peluso, N. L. (1995). Territorialization and state power in Thailand. Theory and Society, 385-426.

Vitória, A. C., Bressan Smith, A. E., Lourenzani, M. M., Caldas, C. H., Corrêa, B., & Bernardo, R. (2022). The benefits and barriers of geographical indications to producers: A review. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 37(6), 707–719.

Vivas Eugui, D. (2001). Negotiations on geographical indications in the TRIPS Council and their effect on the WTO agricultural negotiations: Implications for developing countries and the case of Venezuela. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 4(5), 703–728.

WIPO. (2003). Geographical Indications Protection Act B.E. 2546 (2003), Thailand. https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/-en/legislation/details/6811

WIPO. (2025a). Article 22.1 of TRIPS: Uruguay Round Agreement — TRIPS, Part II: Standards concerning the availability, scope and use of intellectual property rights. https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/27-trips_04b_e.htm

World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). (2025). Geographical indications. https://www.wipo.int/en/web/-geographical-indications

Downloads

Published

2025-12-29

Issue

Section

Social Science

How to Cite

Mohd Khalid, A. H., Yusof, Y., Masum, A., & Md. Nor, M. Z. (2025). PROTECTING ORIGIN AND CULTURE: GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATONS IN MALAYSIA, INDONESIA AND THAILAND. International Journal of Humanities Technology and Civilization, 10(2), 227-235. https://doi.org/10.15282/ijhtc.v10i2.12987

Similar Articles

1-10 of 64

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.