Impact of Throat Diameter, Length, and Divergent Angle on Bubble Formation and Flow Characteristics in Venturi Microbubble Generators

Authors

  • Niellambare Nadumaran Faculty of Manufacturing and Mechatronic Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah, 26600 Pahang, Malaysia
  • Erny Afiza Alias Centre for Research in Advanced Fluid and Processes, Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah, 26600 Pahang, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15282/ijame.22.4.2025.7.0984

Keywords:

Bubble formation, Throat diameter, Throat length, Divergent angle, Venturi, Microbubble

Abstract

The design of a Venturi microbubble generator (VMBG) is crucial in influencing the size and distribution of produced microbubbles, which are essential in several industrial, medicinal, and environmental applications. This study examines the impact of three critical geometric parameters: throat diameter, throat length, and divergent angle, on the formation of bubbles and the characteristics of flow. A combination of experimental visualization using Particle Image Velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics simulations using the Euler–Lagrange approach with the realizable k-epsilon turbulence model was employed. Nine VMBG configurations were tested, with throat diameters of 8.5 mm, 12 mm, and 20 mm, throat lengths of 10 mm, 15 mm, and 30 mm, and divergent angles of 30°, 45°, and 60°. The findings showed that decreasing the throat diameter from 12 mm to 8.5 mm produced smaller and denser bubbles, resulting in an increase in flow velocity by 68% and vorticity by 30%. Results showed that smaller throat diameters (8.5 mm) increased flow velocities, turbulence, and vorticity, while longer throat lengths (30 mm) provided smoother fluid transitions. Larger divergent angles caused a significant drop in velocity, increased turbulence, and produced smaller bubble sizes. However, they also promoted bubble expansion and denser formation in the divergent section. Both throat diameter and throat length also played a crucial role in undergoing complete bubble formation stages. Experimental results, which were very similar to the computer results, verified the four stages of bubble formation: nucleation, expansion, coalescence, and breakdown. The study provides valuable insights for enhancing VMBG designs, enabling the creation of microbubbles with features suitable for specific applications.

References

[1] K. Sakamatapan, M. Mesgarpour, O. Mahian, H. S. Ahn, S. Wongwises, “Experimental investigation of the microbubble generation using a venturi-type bubble generator,” Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, vol. 27, pp. 101238, 2021.

[2] N. Nadumaran, E. A. Alias, M. H. Hamidi, N. H. Johari, “Effect of divergent angle and water flowrate on mean bubble size in venturi-type generator: An experimental and computational approach,” Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 10667-10675, 2025.

[3] Y. He, T. Zhang, L. Lv, W. Tang, Y. Wang, J. Zhou, et al., “Application of microbubbles in chemistry, wastewater treatment, medicine, cosmetics, and agriculture: a review,” Environmental Chemistry Letters, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 3245-3271, 2023.

[4] I. Taukhid, A. Dirpan, Misbah, M. I. Mukhsen, Ariyanto, B. R. Tampangallo, “Microbubble generator to support aeration for aquaculture: A bibliometric analysis,” Thalassas: An International Journal of Marine Sciences, vol. 41, no. 3, p. 130, 2025.

[5] R. Fitriadi, M. Palupi, “Application of microbubble technology to increase oxygen content in the aquaculture of tambaqui (Colossoma macropomum),” Journal of Aquaculture and Fish Health, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 328-339, 2024.

[6] V. S. Ganesh, K. V. Venkatesh, D. Sihivahanan, P. K. Yadalam, D. Shrivastava, K.C. Srivastava, “Effect of microbubble as local drug delivery system in endodontic management – An in-vitro study,” Saudi Dental Journal, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 863-867, 2024.

[7] T. Saliev, M. Akishev, “Ultrasound binary microbubble drug delivery and drug synthesis for cancer treatment,” Journal of Analytical Science & Technology, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 11, 2025.

[8] Z. Chang, S. Niu, Z. Shen, L. Zou, H. Wang, “Latest advances and progress in the microbubble flotation of fine minerals: Microbubble preparation, equipment, and applications,” International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 1244-1260, 2023.

[9] E.A. Alias, H. Okanaga, “Effect of skin friction reduction by microbubbles in pipe flow,” Proceedings of the School of Engineering of Tokai University, vol. 37, pp. 23-27, 2021.

[10] A. Erny, D. Fatimah, I. Muhammad, “Fundamental characteristics of microbubbles in water and diesel fuel,” in MATEC Web of Conferences, EDP Sciences, vol. 225, p. 05015, 2018.

[11] N.A. Mohd Pouzi, E.A. Alias, M. Pira, D. Mani, S.H. Norazman, “An experimental study on the efficiency of microbubbles in enhance oil recovery method (EOR) in different types of oils,” Journal of Advanced Research in Experimental Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 30-40, 2025.

[12] A. García-Magariño, S. Sor, R. Bardera, P. López-Gavilán, “Theoretical model for microbubble drag reduction technique applied to marine propellers,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 329, pp. 120797, 2025.

[13] Y. Song, R. Xu, K. Cai, J. Yin, D. Wang, “Numerical studies on bubble dynamics in an unsteady turbulence of the venturi bubble generator applied to TMSR,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, vol. 160, p. 108322, 2021.

[14] D.A. Wilson, K. Pun, P.B. Ganesan, F. Hamad, “Geometrical optimization of a venturi-type microbubble generator using CFD simulation and experimental measurements,” Designs, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 4, 2021.

[15] J. Huang, L. Sun, Z. Mo, Y. Feng, J. Bao, J. Tang, “Experimental investigation on the effect of throat size on bubble transportation and breakup in small Venturi channels,” International Journal of Multiphase Flow, vol. 142, p. 103737, 2021.

[16] N. Saffreena, A. Kaneko, “Effect of throat size on pressure and void fraction fluctuation in venturi tube microbubble generator,” in Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, Springer, pp. 325-329, 2024.

[17] P.K. Ullas, D. Chatterjee, S. Vengadesan, “Experimental study on the effect of throat length in the dynamics of internal unsteady cavitating flow,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 35, no. 2, p. 023332, 2023.

[18] S.D.P. Sidhi, A. Pujianto, A. Nurfauzi, D. Prasetyo, B. Basino, M.A. Ansori, et al., “Improving the performance of microbubble through the modification and optimization of venturi-type generator,” Jurnal Polimesin, vol. 22, no. 2, p. 211, 2024.

[19] L. Zhao, L. Sun, Z. Mo, J. Tang, L. Hu, J. Bao, “An investigation on bubble motion in liquid flowing through a rectangular venturi channel,” Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, vol. 97, pp. 48-58, 2018.

[20] L. Zhao, L. Sun, Z. Mo, M. Du, J. Huang, J. Bao, et al., “Effects of the divergent angle on bubble transportation in a rectangular venturi channel and its performance in producing fine bubbles,” International Journal of Multiphase Flow, vol. 114, pp. 192-206, 2019.

[21] W. Wang, X. Zhang, C. Li, Y. Zou, G. Li, Y. Chen, et al., “Bubble behavior, flow characteristics, and mass transfer enhancement in self-priming Venturi tubes,” Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 270, p. 118536, 2023.

[22] X. Vilaida, S. Kythavone, T. Iijima, “Effect of throat size on performance of microbubble generator and waste water treatment,” in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 639, no. 1, p. 012031, 2019.

[23] J. Chen, M. Lei, S. Lu, X. Xiao, M. Yao, Q. Li, “Numerical simulation of single bubble motion fragmentation mechanism in venturi-type bubble generator,” Mechanics and Industry, vol. 25, p. 21, 2024.

[24] Y. Song, Y. Shentu, Y. Qian, J. Yin, D. Wang, “Experiment and modeling of liquid-phase flow in a venturi tube using stereoscopic PIV,” Nuclear Engineering and Technology, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 79–92, 2021.

[25] L. Zhang, L. Tian, Q. Shen, F. Liu, H. Li, Z. Dong, et al., “Study on the influence and optimization of the venturi effect on the natural ventilation of buildings in the Xichang area,” Energies, vol. 14, no. 16, p. 5053, 2021.

[26] P. Pipp, M. Hočevar, M. Dular, “Challenges of numerical simulations of cavitation reactors for water treatment – An example of flow simulation inside a cavitating microchannel,” Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, vol. 77, p. 105663, 2021.

[27] Ş. Koçyiğit, M.E. Emiroğlu, “The effect of the throat length and the hole diameter in throat portion of the venturi nozzle on aeration efficiency,” International Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 125-135, 2024.

[28] J.X. Zhang, “Analysis on the effect of venturi tube structural parameters on fluid flow,” AIP Advances, vol. 7, no. 6, p. 065315, 2017.

[29] Y. Zhou, J. Cui, Z. Chen, J. Liu, L. He, W. Fan, et al., “Parametric analysis of venturi-type microbubble generator and the bubble fragmentation dynamics,” Desalination and Water Treatment, vol. 322, p. 101116, 2025.

[30] Q. Li, X. Guo, D. Z. Ming, M. Lei, J. L. Liu, L. Fang, et al., “Mechanism of microbubbles and cavitation effect on bubble breakage in a venturi bubble generator,” Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 778-793, 2023.

[31] X. Wang, Y. Shuai, H. Zhang, J. Sun, Y. Yang, Z. Huang, et al., “Bubble breakup in a swirl-venturi microbubble generator,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 403, p. 126397, 2020.

[32] Y. Liu, B. Li, “Numerical investigation of the cavitation characteristics in venturi tubes: The role of converging and diverging sections,” Applied Sciences, vol. vol. 13, no. 13, p. 7476, 2023.

[33] L. Zhao, Z. Mo, L. Sun, G. Xie, H. Liu, M. Du, et al., “A visualized study of the motion of individual bubbles in a venturi-type bubble generator,” Progress in Nuclear Energy, vol. 97, p. 74-89, 2017.

[34] H.S. Alam, M.I. Arif, T.A.F. Soelaiman, P. Sutikno, A.T. Sugiarto, A. Yusuf, “Experimental and numerical study of bubbly flow and bubble size distribution produced by swirling flow bubble generator,” Results in Engineering, vol. 27, p. 106099 2025.

[35] J. RuanJ. Ruan, H. Zhou, Z. Ding, Y. Zhang, L. Zhao, J. Zhang, et al., “Machine learning-aided characterization of microbubbles for venturi bubble generator,” Chemical Engineering Journal vol. 465, p. 142763, 2023.

[36] A. Fujiwara, K. Okamoto, K. Hashiguchi, J. Peixinho, S. Takagi, Y. Matsumoto, “Bubble breakup phenomena in a venturi tube,” in Proceedings of FEDSM2007, vol. 42886, pp. 553-560, 2007.

[37] N. Niellambare, H.H. Mohamad, A.A. Erny, H.J. Nasrul, “Investigation on the effect of venturi geometry variation on microbubble generation,” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 2610, no. 1, p. 050009, 2022.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-16

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

[1]
N. Nadumaran and E. A. Alias, “Impact of Throat Diameter, Length, and Divergent Angle on Bubble Formation and Flow Characteristics in Venturi Microbubble Generators”, Int. J. Automot. Mech. Eng., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 12933–12942, Nov. 2025, doi: 10.15282/ijame.22.4.2025.7.0984.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 197

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.